Product Development Strategy, Product Innovation Performance, and the Mediating Role of Knowledge Utilization: Evidence from Subsidiaries in China

This study examines the interplay of product development strategy, knowledge utilization, and product innovation performance in the context of Chinese subsidiaries of multinational companies. When firms strive to develop highly innovative products (breakthrough focus), the amount of resources allocated has a U-shaped relationship to subsequent product innovation performance (i.e., market rewards of new products). When the aim of product development activity is to reinforce and maintain moderately innovative products (platform focus), increased resource allocation shows a positive relationship to product innovation performance. The amount of resources allocated to minor revisions (incremental focus) shows no significant relationship to product innovation performance. Knowledge utilization is an important predictor of the benefits of developing highly and moderately innovative products. Moreover, it helps to mitigate the drawbacks of a breakthrough focus and strengthens the positive impact of a platform focus.

[1]  R. Vernon.  International investment and international trade in the product cycle , 1966 .

[2]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[3]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[4]  S. Hymer,et al.  The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment , 1976 .

[5]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[6]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Identifying industrial new product success: Project NewProd , 1979 .

[7]  R. Caves,et al.  Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis: Preface , 2007 .

[8]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[9]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[10]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  R. Cooper,et al.  New Products: What Separates Winners from Losers? , 1987 .

[12]  William R. Dillon,et al.  Constrained Discrimination via MDI Estimation: The use of Additional Information in Segmentation Analysis , 1987 .

[13]  Roger Calantone,et al.  An Integrative Model of the New Product Development Process: An Empirical Validation , 1988 .

[14]  Wheelwright Sc,et al.  The new product development map. , 1989 .

[15]  W. Sasser,et al.  The new product development map. , 1989, Harvard business review.

[16]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control Within Multinational Corporations , 1991 .

[17]  R. Cooper,et al.  The Impact of Product Innovativeness on Performance , 1991 .

[18]  Vincent di Norcia.  Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution , 1991 .

[19]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[20]  K. Clark,et al.  Creating project plans to focus product development. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[21]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[22]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[23]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  BOARD OF DIRECTOR INVOLVEMENT IN RESTRUCTURING: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD VERSUS MANAGERIAL CONTROLS , 1993 .

[24]  G. Tellis,et al.  Pioneer Advantage: Marketing Logic or Marketing Legend? , 1993 .

[25]  W. Mitchell,et al.  The effect of introducing important incremental innovations on market share and business survival , 1995 .

[26]  K. Hatten,et al.  Further evidence on the validity of the self typing paragraph approach: Miles and snow strategic , 1995 .

[27]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[28]  R. Cooper,et al.  Benchmarking the Firm's Critical Success Factors in New Product Development , 1995 .

[29]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. , 1995 .

[30]  J. Birkinshaw.  How Multinational Subsidiary Mandates are Gained and Lost , 1996 .

[31]  Sanjay Mishra,et al.  Factors affecting new product success: Cross-country comparisons☆ , 1996 .

[32]  A. Griffin.  PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices , 1997 .

[33]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[34]  R. Burt.  The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[35]  Torben Pedersen,et al.  Centres of excellence in Multinational Companies: The Case of Denmark , 1998 .

[36]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Managing knowledge in global service firms: Centers of excellence , 1998 .

[37]  David M. Brock,et al.  Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development , 1998 .

[38]  G. Hult,et al.  Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination , 1998 .

[39]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[40]  M. Montoya-Weiss,et al.  Critical development activities for really new versus incremental products , 1998 .

[41]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Learning to Compete in a Transition Economy: Experience, Environment, and Performance , 1999 .

[42]  Ivo Zander,et al.  How do you mean `global'? An empirical investigation of innovation networks in the multinational corporation , 1999 .

[43]  R. Pearce.  The evolution of technology in multinational enterprises: the role of creative subsidiaries , 1999 .

[44]  W. Kuemmerle.  The Drivers of Foreign Direct Investment into Research and Development: An Empirical Investigation , 1999 .

[45]  B. Byrne.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[46]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Product Sequencing: Co-Evolution of Knowledge, Capabilities and Products. , 2000 .

[47]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  Why Some New Products are More Successful than Others , 2001 .

[48]  E. Autio,et al.  SOCIAL CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION, AND KNOWLEDGE EXPLOITATION IN YOUNG TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS , 2001 .

[49]  Erwin Danneels,et al.  Product innovativeness from the firm's perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance , 2001 .

[50]  M. Schulz.  THE UNCERTAIN RELEVANCE OF NEWNESS: ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE FLOWS , 2001 .

[51]  Wallace E. Carroll,et al.  Determinants of transnational new product development capability: testing the influence of transferring and deploying tacit overseas knowledge , 2001 .

[52]  Haiyang Li,et al.  Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China , 2001 .

[53]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Strategic alignment and performance of market‐seeking MNCs in China , 2001 .

[54]  T. Pedersen,et al.  Transferring knowledge in MNCs: The role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context , 2002 .

[55]  B. Chakravarthy,et al.  The persistence of knowledge‐based advantage: an empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge , 2002 .

[56]  H. Ernst.  Success Factors of New Product Development: A Review of the Empirical Literature , 2002 .

[57]  Walter Kuemmerle,et al.  Home base and knowledge management in international ventures , 2002 .

[58]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation , 2002 .

[59]  R. Mudambi.  Knowledge management in multinational firms , 2002 .

[60]  G. O'Connor,et al.  Managing radical innovation: an overview of emergent strategy issues , 2002 .

[61]  Young-Won Ha,et al.  Determinants of Korean and Japanese New Product Performance: An Interrelational and Process View , 2003 .

[62]  Robert M. Morgan,et al.  The Role of Existing Knowledge in New Product Innovativeness and Performance , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[63]  Mark B. Houston,et al.  Barriers to Matching New Technologies and Market Opportunities in Established Firms , 2003 .

[64]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[65]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[66]  M. Guillén,et al.  Experience, imitation, and the sequence of foreign entry: wholly owned and joint-venture manufacturing by South Korean firms and business groups in China, 1987–1995 , 2003 .

[67]  I. Nonaka,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge , 2003 .

[68]  R. Chandy,et al.  Sources and Financial Consequences of Radical Innovation: Insights from Pharmaceuticals , 2003 .

[69]  P. Almeida,et al.  Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: the influence of the MNC and host country on innovation , 2004 .

[70]  J. Cantwell,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and Competence-Creating Knowledge Flows: A Theoretical Analysis , 2004 .

[71]  K. Zhou,et al.  The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology- and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations , 2005 .

[72]  Mcdp Mathieu Weggeman,et al.  Determinants of the Level of Knowledge Application: A Knowledge‐Based and Information‐Processing Perspective* , 2005 .

[73]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  KNOWLEDGE SHARING IN ORGANIZATIONS: MULTIPLE NETWORKS, MULTIPLE PHASES , 2005 .

[74]  Masaaki Kotabe,et al.  Strategic alliance-based sourcing and market performance: evidence from foreign firms operating in China , 2005 .

[75]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer , 2005 .

[76]  Jiatao Li,et al.  Managing global research and development in China: Patterns of R&D configuration and evolution , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[77]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Decomposing Product Innovativeness and Its Effects on New Product Success , 2006 .

[78]  Nadine Roijakkers,et al.  Inter-firm R&D partnering in pharmaceutical biotechnology since 1975: Trends, patterns, and networks , 2006 .

[79]  G. Tellis,et al.  Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science , 2006 .

[80]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[81]  R. Parente,et al.  Determinants of cross-national knowledge transfer and its effect on firm innovation , 2007 .

[82]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[83]  Lisa C . Troy,et al.  Innovativeness and new product success: insights from the cumulative evidence , 2007 .

[84]  David A. Griffith,et al.  An Examination of Exploration and Exploitation Capabilities: Implications for Product Innovation and Market Performance , 2007 .

[85]  Haiyang Li,et al.  R&D intensity and international joint venture performance in an emerging market: moderating effects of market focus and ownership structure , 2007 .

[86]  J. Rossiter,et al.  The Predictive Validity of Multiple-Item versus Single-Item Measures of the Same Constructs , 2007 .

[87]  Anupama Phene,et al.  Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities , 2008 .

[88]  Eric Winsberg,et al.  A tale of two methods , 2009, Synthese.

[89]  L. F. Lages,et al.  Relationship Capabilities, Quality, and Innovation as Determinants of Export Performance , 2009 .

[90]  Doris Gomezelj Omerzel,et al.  Knowledge Management in SMEs , 2009 .

[91]  Ruby P. Lee,et al.  Extending the Environment–Strategy–Performance Framework: The Roles of Multinational Corporation Network Strength, Market Responsiveness, and Product Innovation , 2010 .

[92]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  New Product Strategy in Small Technology-Based Firms: A Pilot Study , 2011 .

[93]  K. Sauvant.  Overcoming Liability for Foreignness , 2011 .