Applicant–Employee Fit in Personality: Testing Predictions from Similarity‐Attraction Theory and Trait Activation Theory

We extend prior research by examining whether, and how, applicant–employee fit in the personality traits of conscientiousness, agreeableness, and extraversion affect organizational attractiveness. We test hypotheses based on similarity‐attraction theory and trait activation theory. Results from two studies indicate that applicants high in valued traits are more attracted to organizations when employees are more similar to them in those personality traits, whereas employees’ trait levels do not affect attraction for applicants low in valued traits. The effects of objective applicant–employee fit in personality on attractiveness were mediated by perceived applicant–employee fit. The pattern of the observed applicant–employee fit interactions was best predicted by trait activation theory and, thus, provide an important extension to similarity‐attraction theory.

[1]  Celia V. Harquail,et al.  Organizational images and member identification. , 1994 .

[2]  K. Jansen,et al.  Issues of person-organization fit. , 2007 .

[3]  Patrick J. Murphy,et al.  Personality and Situations in Co-worker Preference: Similarity and Complementarity in Worker Compatibility , 2002 .

[4]  Robert P. Tett,et al.  Personality tests at the crossroads: A response to Morgeson, Campion, Dipboye, Hollenbeck, Murphy, and Schmitt (2007). , 2007 .

[5]  John A. Johnson,et al.  The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures ☆ , 2006 .

[6]  M. Orne On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. , 1962 .

[7]  Kelly A. Piasentin,et al.  Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: a meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  Amy L. Kristof PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND IMPLICATIONS , 1996 .

[9]  J. M. Digman PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[10]  T. M. Amabile,et al.  The Work Preference Inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  J. Edwards,et al.  Complementary and supplementary fit: a theoretical and empirical integration. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  R. Caplan Person-environment fit theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms , 1987 .

[13]  D. Wentzel,et al.  The effect of applicant–employee fit and temporal construal on employer attraction and pursuit intentions , 2012 .

[14]  T. Judge,et al.  Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analysis. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[16]  D. Day,et al.  Personality Similarity and Work-Related Outcomes among African-American Nursing Personnel: A Test of the Supplementary Model of Person-Environment Congruence. , 1995 .

[17]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[18]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  Validity of Customer Service Measures in Personnel Selection: A Review of Criterion and Construct Evidence , 1998 .

[19]  Daniel M. Cable,et al.  APPLICANT PERSONALITY, ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE, AND ORGANIZATION ATTRACTION , 1997 .

[20]  R. Tett,et al.  A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  B. Schneider THE PEOPLE MAKE THE PLACE , 1987 .

[22]  Filip Lievens,et al.  Tapping the grapevine: a closer look at word-of-mouth as a recruitment source. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[24]  Daniel M. Cable,et al.  Person–Organization Fit, Job Choice Decisions, and Organizational Entry☆ , 1996 .

[25]  Filip Lievens,et al.  Investigating Web-Based Recruitment Sources: Employee Testimonials vs. Word-of-Mouse , 2007 .

[26]  A. Tellegen,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES An Alternative "Description of Personality": The Big-Five Factor Structure , 2022 .

[27]  Ning Li,et al.  Retaining the Productive Employee: The Role of Personality , 2014 .

[28]  D. Byrne The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[29]  Thomas L. Keon,et al.  Organizational attractiveness: an interactionist perspective , 1993 .

[30]  J. Breaugh Employee recruitment. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[31]  S. Carless Person-job fit versus person-organization fit as predictors of organizational attraction and job acceptance intentions : A longitudinal study , 2005 .

[32]  P. Hanges,et al.  A network model of organizational climate: Friendship clusters, subgroup agreement, and climate schemas , 2008 .

[33]  R. Tett,et al.  Situation Trait Relevance, Trait Expression, and Cross-Situational Consistency: Testing a Principle of Trait Activation , 2000 .

[34]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[35]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  Daniel M. Cable,et al.  Establishing the dimensions, sources and value of job seekers' employer knowledge during recruitment , 2001 .

[37]  Scott Highhouse,et al.  Applicant–employee similarity and attraction to an employer , 2008 .

[38]  J. Slaughter,et al.  Narrow personality traits and organizational attraction: Evidence for the complementary hypothesis , 2011 .

[39]  Jaap J. A. Denissen,et al.  In the eye of the beholder: perceived, actual, and peer-rated similarity in personality, communication, and friendship intensity during the acquaintanceship process. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Ning Li,et al.  The Theory of Purposeful Work Behavior: The Role of Personality, Higher-Order Goals, and Job Characteristics , 2012 .

[41]  R. Cialdini Influence: Science and Practice , 1984 .

[42]  P. Costa,et al.  Domains and facets: hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory. , 1995, Journal of personality assessment.

[43]  A. Kristof-brown,et al.  CONSEQUENCES OF INDIVIDUALS' FIT AT WORK: A META-ANALYSIS OF PERSON-JOB, PERSON-ORGANIZATION, PERSON-GROUP, AND PERSON-SUPERVISOR FIT , 2005 .

[44]  F. Lievens,et al.  Organizational Attractiveness for Prospective Applicants: A Person-Organisation Fit Perspective , 2001 .

[45]  K. Yu Person–organization fit effects on organizational attraction : a test of an expectations-based model , 2014 .

[46]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  When opposites attract: a multi-sample demonstration of complementary person-team fit on extraversion. , 2005, Journal of personality.

[47]  A. V. Vianen A review of person-environment fit research: Prospects for personnel selection , 2005 .

[48]  John W. Fleenor,et al.  Personality and organizations: A test of the homogeneity of personality hypothesis. , 1998 .

[49]  Fred E. Fiedler,et al.  Perceived Similarity, Personality, and Attraction to Large Organizations , 1973 .

[50]  Benjamin Schneider,et al.  The ASA framework: An update. , 1995 .

[51]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  An investigation of personality similarity effects (relational and perceived) on peer and supervisor ratings and the role of familiarity and liking , 2001 .

[52]  Filip Lievens,et al.  Large-scale investigation of the role of trait activation theory for understanding assessment center convergent and discriminant validity. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[53]  Daniel A. Newman,et al.  Recruitment efforts to reduce adverse impact: targeted recruiting for personality, cognitive ability, and diversity. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.