A Comparative Evaluation of Mobility Conditions in Selected Cities of the Five Brazilian Regions

This study evaluates and compares the mobility conditions of cities of the five Brazilian macroregions based on the outcomes of the Index of Sustainable Urban Mobility (I_SUM). The Index, applied in Belem, Curitiba, Goiânia, Juazeiro do Norte, Uberlândia and Itajuba, has a hierarchical structure formed by nine Domains, 37 Themes and 87 Indicators. The study involved two phases. In the first, the existence of data required for the application of the index in the cities was investigated, considering two criteria: data availability and data quality. Next, an extensive data collection procedure was conducted and the index values were calculated. The availability of the mobility information needed for the construction of the Index was used to explore which were the domains with missing information in each city or how the information was collected in the different cities. The mobility conditions in the selected cities were also compared so that the aspects that might drive some of them towards sustainable mobility could be identified. In general, the cities located in the wealthier part of the country performed better. The city sizes also seem to have affected their performance. The differences regarding the context are also among the highlighted aspects, given the marked regional dissimilarities among the cities that affect the availability and quality of the data.

[1]  Todd Litman Exploring the Paradigm Shifts Needed To Reconcile Transportation and Sustainability Objectives , 1999 .

[2]  Rui A. R. Ramos,et al.  Development and Application of I_SUM--An Index of Sustainable Urban Mobility , 2010 .

[3]  Henrik Gudmundsson,et al.  Benchmarking and Sustainable Transport Policy: Learning from the BEST Network , 2005 .

[4]  Todd Alexander Litman,et al.  Sustainable Transportation Indicators: A Recommended Research Program For Developing Sustainable Transportation Indicators and Data , 2009 .

[5]  Henrik Gudmundsson,et al.  Indicators and performance measures for Transportation, Environment and Sustainability in North America: Report from a German Marshall Fund Fellowship 2000 individual study tour October2000 , 2001 .

[6]  R. Cervero The Transit Metropolis: A Global Inquiry , 1998 .

[7]  A. Páez,et al.  Sustainable Urban transportation: Performance indicators and some analytical approaches , 2002 .

[8]  Tony May,et al.  Sustainability in Transport , 2007 .

[9]  T. Litman,et al.  Issues in sustainable transportation , 2006 .

[10]  Antônio Nélson Rodrigues da Silva,et al.  Multiple views of sustainable urban mobility: The case of Brazil , 2008 .

[11]  V. Maclaren Urban Sustainability Reporting , 1996 .

[12]  K M Gwilliam,et al.  SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT: PRIORITIES FOR POLICY REFORM , 1996 .

[13]  Barbara C. Richardson,et al.  SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT: ANALYSIS FRAMEWORKS , 2005 .

[14]  Robert A. Johnston,et al.  Indicators for Sustainable Transportation Planning , 2008 .

[15]  Associates,et al.  Guidance for estimating the indirect effects of proposed transportation projects , 1998 .

[16]  William R. Black,et al.  Sustainable Transportation: Problems and Solutions , 2010 .

[17]  Antônio Nélson Rodrigues da Silva,et al.  BENCHMARKING SUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY: THE CASE OF CURITIBA, BRAZIL , 2012 .

[18]  Pascal Pochet,et al.  Towards Sustainable Mobility Indicators: Application to the Lyons Conurbation , 2003 .

[19]  Henrick Gudmundsson,et al.  Sustainable Transport and Performance Indicators , 2004 .