Clinical Outcomes of Conical Hip Prosthesis Used In Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION Congenital dysplasia of the hip, presence of intramedullary bony pedestals, and related pathologies present unique challenges to the orthopaedic surgeon when considering total hip arthroplasty (THA). In these circumstances, a conical prosthesis has proven to be effective. The purpose of this study is to report the short-term radiological and clinical outcomes of the Wagner Cone Prosthesis® (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana) utilized for a range of etiologies at a major North American healthcare system. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study was performed at a single healthcare system between 2007 and 2018. Demographic variables, including age, sex, and laterality, as well as surgical variables, including femoral head size, neck-shaft angle, stem diameter, surgical approach, and indication for THA, were collected for each hip. Radiographs were also examined for subsidence, limb length discrepancy (LLD), and Crowe classification if the hip was dysplastic. RESULTS Thirty-one THAs were performed using a Wagner Cone Prosthesis®. No intraoperative or postoperative implant-related complications were reported. Fourteen hips were dysplastic, and of these, 10 were classified as Crowe I, one as Crowe II, two as Crowe III, and one as Crowe IV. No implant was observed to have subsidence greater than 1cm. The average LLD following arthroplasty was 1.38mm ± 9.4mm shorter than the contralateral side. CONCLUSION The Wagner Cone Prosthesis® serves as a useful implant for THA. In our sample, it had excellent survivorship, impressive postoperative radiographic measurements obtained from most recent follow up, minimal mean subsidence, and minimal complication rates.

[1]  P. Zhen,et al.  Developmental hip dysplasia treated by total hip arthroplasty using a cementless Wagner cone stem in young adult patients with a small physique , 2017, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[2]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Heterotopic Ossification in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Direct Anterior vs Direct Lateral Approach. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  W. Hamilton,et al.  Is the Anterior Approach Safe? Early Complication Rate Associated With 5090 Consecutive Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Procedures Performed Using the Anterior Approach. , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  B. Masri,et al.  The Wagner Cone Stem for the Management of the Challenging Femur in Primary Hip Arthroplasty. , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  R. Maheshwari,et al.  Total Hip Replacement in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Using Wagner Cone Prosthesis with Small Diameter Metal-On-Metal Articulation , 2013 .

[6]  R. West,et al.  Risk Factors for Heterotopic Ossification in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2012, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[7]  S. Giannini,et al.  Congenital hip dysplasia treated by total hip arthroplasty using cementless tapered stem in patients younger than 50 years old: results after 12-years follow-up , 2011, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[8]  Raúl Torres Claramunt,et al.  Total hip replacement with an uncemented Wagner cone stem for patients with congenital hip dysplasia , 2011, International Orthopaedics.

[9]  A. Schuh,et al.  Long-term results of the Wagner cone prosthesis , 2009, International Orthopaedics.

[10]  T. Matsushita,et al.  A simple method to minimize limb-length discrepancy after hip arthroplasty , 2006, Acta orthopaedica.

[11]  H. Sintonen,et al.  Quality of life and functional ability in hip and knee replacements: A prospective study , 1996, Quality of Life Research.

[12]  C. Ranawat,et al.  Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.