Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation

Abstract This paper examines the impact of corporate governance innovations on top director compensation in a sample of 213 large UK companies between 1988 and 1993. An enabling factor in the analysis is access to survey data on recent corporate governance changes in UK companies. The paper finds that director compensation and current shareholder returns are positively correlated. However, in line with other recent UK research the paper finds little evidence of a link between directors' pay (salary and bonus) and pre-dated shareholder returns. There is also some evidence that governance variables play a role in shaping top director pay. Companies which adopt remuneration committees are seen, in some circumstances, to have lower growth rates in top director compensation. Separating the roles of CEO and chairman, however, appears to play no part in shaping directors' pay.

[1]  J. Tirole The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1988 .

[2]  Andrew Cosh The Remuneration of Chief Executives in the United Kingdom , 1975 .

[3]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems , 1993, A Theory of the Firm.

[4]  Brian G. M. Main,et al.  Remuneration Committees and Corporate Governance , 1993 .

[5]  Martin J. Conyon,et al.  TOP PAY, COMPANY PERFORMANCE AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE† , 2009 .

[6]  Jonathan S. Leonard Executive Pay and Firm Performance , 1990 .

[7]  Kevin J. Murphy,et al.  Corporate performance and managerial remuneration: An empirical analysis , 1985 .

[8]  Kevin J. Murphy,et al.  Performance Pay and Top Management Incentives , 1990 .

[9]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Moral Hazard in Teams , 1982 .

[10]  Brian K. Boyd,et al.  Board control and ceo compensation , 1994 .

[11]  Wilbur G. Lewellen,et al.  Managerial Pay and Corporate Performance , 1970 .

[12]  Robert Gibbons,et al.  Optimal Incentive Contracts in the Presence of Career Concerns: Theory and Evidence , 1992 .

[13]  Brian G. M. Main,et al.  Total board remuneration and company performance , 1996 .

[14]  Kevin J. Murphy,et al.  Relative Performance Evaluation for Chief Executive Officers , 1989 .

[15]  John M. Abowd,et al.  Does Performance-Based Managerial Compensation Affect Corporate Performance? , 1990 .

[16]  Andrea Shepard,et al.  Regulatory Constraints on CEO Compensation , 1993 .

[17]  Stephen Nickell,et al.  Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects , 1981 .

[18]  O. Williamson The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting , 1985 .

[19]  M. Arellano,et al.  Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations , 1991 .

[20]  P. Gregg,et al.  The Disappearing Relationship Between Directors' Pay and Corporate Performance , 1993 .

[21]  Sherwin Rosen,et al.  Contracts and the Market for Executives , 1990 .

[22]  M. Conyon,et al.  Pay at the Top: A Study of the Sensitivity of Top Director Remuneration to Company Specific Shocks , 1994, National Institute Economic Review.

[23]  M. Conyon,et al.  Taking care of business: executive compensation in the U , 1995 .

[24]  Edward P. Lazear,et al.  Salaries and Piece Rates , 1986 .

[25]  Brian G. M. Main,et al.  Top executive pay and performance , 1991 .