Acceptance Test of a Commercially Available Software for Automatic Image Registration of Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) And 99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI) Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Brain Images

This note describes a method to characterize the performances of image fusion software (Syntegra) with respect to accuracy and robustness. Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) studies were acquired from two phantoms and 10 patients. Image registration was performed independently by two couples composed of one radiotherapist and one physicist by means of superposition of anatomic landmarks. Each couple performed jointly and saved the registration. The two solutions were averaged to obtain the gold standard registration. A new set of estimators was defined to identify translation and rotation errors in the coordinate axes, independently from point position in image field of view (FOV). Algorithms evaluated were local correlation (LC) for CT-MRI, normalized mutual information (MI) for CT-MRI, and CT-SPECT registrations. To evaluate accuracy, estimator values were compared to limiting values for the algorithms employed, both in phantoms and in patients. To evaluate robustness, different alignments between images taken from a sample patient were produced and registration errors determined. LC algorithm resulted accurate in CT-MRI registrations in phantoms, but exceeded limiting values in 3 of 10 patients. MI algorithm resulted accurate in CT-MRI and CT-SPECT registrations in phantoms; limiting values were exceeded in one case in CT-MRI and never reached in CT-SPECT registrations. Thus, the evaluation of robustness was restricted to the algorithm of MI both for CT-MRI and CT-SPECT registrations. The algorithm of MI proved to be robust: limiting values were not exceeded with translation perturbations up to 2.5 cm, rotation perturbations up to 10° and roto-translational perturbation up to 3 cm and 5°.

[1]  L Junck,et al.  Correlation methods for the centering, rotation, and alignment of functional brain images. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Valentino Bettinardi,et al.  Multimodality biomedical image integration: Use of a cross-correlation technique , 1991 .

[3]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Registration of 3-D images using weighted geometrical features , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[4]  C Vollmar,et al.  Quantitative comparison of automatic and interactive methods for MRI-SPECT image registration of the brain based on 3-dimensional calculation of error. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  Christopher J Moore,et al.  A feasibility study for image guided radiotherapy using low dose, high speed, cone beam X-ray volumetric imaging. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  M. Braun,et al.  Software for image registration: algorithms, accuracy, efficacy. , 2003, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[7]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Milan Sonka,et al.  "Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume 2. Medical Image Processing and Analysis " , 2000 .

[9]  Roberta Matheoud,et al.  Performance characteristics obtained for a new 3-dimensional lutetium oxyorthosilicate-based whole-body PET/CT scanner with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2001 standard. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  D. Hill,et al.  Medical image registration , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  B. Dawant,et al.  Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy. , 2004, Medical physics.

[12]  Andrew W. Beavis,et al.  Quality assurance of registration of CT and MRI data sets for treatment planning of radiotherapy for head and neck cancers , 2004, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[13]  Colin Studholme,et al.  Evaluation of the limits of visual detection of image misregistration in a brain fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET MRI study , 1997, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  U Pietrzyk,et al.  An interactive technique for three-dimensional image registration: validation for PET, SPECT, MRI and CT brain studies. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  Gerald Q. Maguire,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  J L Andersson,et al.  A method for coregistration of PET and MR brain images. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[18]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  S Mutic,et al.  Multimodality image registration quality assurance for conformal three-dimensional treatment planning. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.