The design of a five-degree-of-freedom powered orthosis for the upper limb

Abstract In response to the need for a sophisticated powered upper-limb orthosis for use by people with disabilities and/or limb weakness or injury, the MULOS (motorized upper-limb orthotic system) has been developed. This is a five-degree-of-freedom electrically powered device having three degrees of freedom at the shoulder, one at the elbow and one to provide pronation/supination. The shoulder mechanism consists of a serial linkage having an equivalent centre of rotation close to that of the anatomical shoulder; this is a self-contained module in which power transmission is provided by tensioned cables. The elbow and pronation/supination modules are also self-contained. The system has been designed to operate under three modes of control: 1. As an assistive robot attached directly to the arm to provide controlled movements for people with severe disability. In this case, it can be operated by a variety of control interfaces, including a specially designed five-degree-of-freedom joystick. 2. Continuous passive motion for the therapy of joints after injury. The trajectory of the joints is selected by ‘walk-through’ programming and can be replayed for a given number of cycles at a chosen speed. 3. As an exercise device to provide strengthening exercises for elderly people or those recovering from injury or surgery. This mode has not been fully implemented at this stage. In assistive mode, prototype testing has demonstrated that the system can provide the movements required for a range of simple tasks and, in continuous passive motion (CPM) mode, the programming system has been successfully implemented. Great attention has been paid to all aspects of safety. Future work is required to identify problems of operation, and to develop new control interfaces.

[1]  G R Johnson,et al.  The measurement of three dimensional scapulohumeral kinematics--a study of reliability. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  J. Cozens Robotic assistance of an active upper limb exercise in neurologically impaired patients. , 1999, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  W. Rymer,et al.  Guidance-based quantification of arm impairment following brain injury: a pilot study. , 1999, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  C. Burgar,et al.  Quantification of force abnormalities during passive and active-assisted upper-limb reaching movements in post-stroke hemiparesis , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  G R Johnson,et al.  Dynamics of the Upper Limb during Performance of the Tasks of Everyday Living—A Review of the Current Knowledge Base , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[7]  G. M. Logan,et al.  A linkage design for the 'machine-to-patient' interface of a servo-controlled motorised hand therapy machine , 1995 .

[8]  G R Johnson,et al.  Computer simulation of the dynamics of a human arm and orthosis linkage mechanism , 1997, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[9]  H Rodgers,et al.  Active and passive scapulohumeral movement in healthy persons: a comparison. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  Richard T. Johnson,et al.  Development of the Utah Artificial Arm , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Raymond G. Gosine,et al.  A functional task analysis and motion simulation for the development of a powered upper-limb orthosis , 1994 .