Eco-efficiency in Portuguese companies of marble sector

The activities developed within an eco-efficiency project in mineral industries located in the largest area for marble extraction in Portugal, in Alentejo region, in the Estremoz – Borba and Vila Viçosa anticline are presented in this paper. The project was designed to apply the sustainability concept in seven companies of marble extraction and transformation. The adopted strategy used new cleaner production models together with sustainable value (SV) improvement, leading to the rationalization of the industrial process, the involvement of economic agents and the orientation of the management of production processes towards eco-efficiency. The challenge was to have the mineral industry managing efficiently the resources on which the business depends, according to sustainability principles. Different opportunities for improvement, related to the minimization of materials, water and energy use, were identified in the companies. Some proposals mainly related to social improvement and small and medium-sized enterprise competitiveness benefits were also selected and discussed. This approach allows the integration of sustainability at company's and region's levels by combining in the entrepreneurial activity the creation of wealth together with the environment protection and the achieving of social benefits. Highlights: The involvement of different stakeholders in the project (Eco-efficiency in Portuguese companies of marble sector) was positive in the discussion and search of solutions for companies. It is possible to involve marble extraction and processing companies in eco-efficiency improvement towards sustainability. Companies from the marble sector improved environmental and social performance and reduced the costs of their production processes by applying SV methodology.

[1]  Reporting A manual for the preparers and users of eco-efficiency indicators , 2004 .

[2]  T. Hahn,et al.  Sustainable Value Added - Measuring Corporate Contributions to Sustainability Beyond Eco-Efficiency , 2004 .

[3]  José João M. Silva Henriques,et al.  How to measure the value from a sustainable point of view , 2006 .

[4]  Helen Briassoulis,et al.  Sustainable Development and its Indicators: Through a (Planner's) Glass Darkly , 2001 .

[5]  Byung-Wook Lee,et al.  Environmental Accounting Guidelines and Corporate Cases in Korea , 2005 .

[6]  Matthias Finkbeiner,et al.  Environmental performance of building materials: life cycle assessment of a typical Sicilian marble , 2009 .

[7]  Chris Laszlo,et al.  Sustainable Value: How the World's Leading Companies Are Doing Well by Doing Good , 2008 .

[8]  Frank Figge,et al.  Sustainable Value creation among companies in the manufacturing sector , 2007 .

[9]  Anna Gazi,et al.  Energy efficiency and environmental assessment of a typical marble quarry and processing plant , 2012 .

[10]  Frank Figge,et al.  The Cost of Sustainability Capital and the Creation of Sustainable Value by Companies , 2005 .

[11]  José João M. Silva Henriques,et al.  Sustainable Value and Cleaner Production – research and application in 19 Portuguese SME , 2015 .

[12]  Rebeka Lukman,et al.  Review of sustainability terms and their definitions , 2007 .

[13]  Rene van Berkel,et al.  Assessment of cleaner production uptake: method development and trial with small businesses in Western Australia , 2007 .

[14]  Jorge M. F. Carvalho,et al.  Decision criteria for the exploration of ornamental-stone deposits: Application to the marbles of the Portuguese Estremoz Anticline , 2008 .

[15]  Rene van Berkel,et al.  Eco-efficiency in the Australian minerals processing sector , 2007 .

[16]  José João M. Silva Henriques,et al.  From cleaner production and value management to sustainable value , 2011 .

[17]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  How not to measure sustainable value (and how one might) , 2009 .

[18]  David Chambers,et al.  Framework for Responsible Mining: A Guide to Evolving Standards , 2005 .