Literal Meaning: Introduction
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Timothy Williamson,et al. Quantifiers and context-dependence , 1995 .
[2] S. Soames. Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity , 2002 .
[3] A. White,et al. The Causal Theory of Perception , 1961 .
[4] F. Récanati. Rigidity and direct reference , 1988 .
[5] K. Bach. On Communicative Intentions: A Reply to Recanti , 1987 .
[6] Jason Stanley,et al. On Quantifier Domain Restriction , 2000 .
[7] Mira Ariel. Accessibility theory: An overview , 2001 .
[8] F. Récanati,et al. Domains of discourse , 1996 .
[9] S. Kuroda. INDEXED PREDICATE CALCULUS , 1982 .
[10] K. Bach. The Myth of Conventional Implicature , 1999 .
[11] F. Récanati,et al. La polysémie contre le fixisme , 1997 .
[12] Raymond W. Gibbs,et al. Pragmatics in understanding what is said , 1997, Cognition.
[13] I. Rumfitt. Content and Context: The Paratactic Theory Revisited and Revised , 1993 .
[14] Jason Stanley,et al. Making it Articulated , 2002 .
[15] Anne Bezuidenhout,et al. Pragmatics, semantic undetermination and the referential/attributive distinction , 1997 .
[16] Kent Bach,et al. You Don't Say? , 2001, Synthese.
[17] J. Searle. Intentionality: Name index , 1983 .
[18] Tomoko Matsui,et al. Experimental Pragmatics: Towards Testing Relevance-Based Predictions about Anaphoric Bridging Inferences , 2001, CONTEXT.
[19] Douglas L. Hintzman,et al. "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .
[20] T. Goschke,et al. Connectionist representation, semantic compositionality, and the instability of concept structure , 1990 .
[21] M. García‐Carpintero. Gricean Rational Reconstructions And The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction , 2001 .
[22] Ray Jackendoff,et al. The Architecture of the Language Faculty , 1996 .
[23] A. Tversky. Features of Similarity , 1977 .
[24] Marjolein Groefsema,et al. Understood arguments: a semantic/pragmatic approach , 1995 .
[25] H. Putnam. Mind, Language and Reality: The meaning of ‘meaning’ , 1975 .
[26] G. Nunberg. The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy , 1979 .
[27] Robert M. Harnish,et al. Meaning and speech acts: A review of: Jerold J. Katz, Propositional structure and illocutionary force☆ , 1979 .
[28] Patrick Blackburn,et al. Tense, Temporal Reference, and Tense Logic , 1994, J. Semant..
[29] Gilbert Harman,et al. Meaning and Semantics , 1999 .
[30] J. Hampton. Inheritance of attributes in natural concept conjunctions , 1987, Memory & cognition.
[31] F. Récanati. The Pragmatics of What is Said , 1989 .
[32] Scott Soames,et al. Incomplete definite descriptions , 1986, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..
[33] D. Rumelhart. Metaphor and Thought: Some problems with the notion of literal meanings , 1993 .
[34] Aaron Snyder. On what has truth value , 1972 .
[35] Sally Mcconnell-Ginet. ADVERBS AND LOGICAL FORM: A LINGUISTICALLY REALISTIC THEORY , 1982 .
[36] Charles J. Fillmore,et al. Pragmatically Controlled Zero Anaphora , 1986 .
[37] B. Partee. Some Structural Analogies between Tenses and Pronouns in English , 1973 .
[38] D. Sperber,et al. Précis of Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1987 .
[39] J. Fodor. The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .
[40] Nathan Salmon,et al. The pragmatic fallacy , 1991 .
[41] Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al. Systematicity and Semantic Ambiguity , 1989 .
[42] Paul Ziff,et al. What is Said , 1972 .
[43] Ran Lahav,et al. Against compositionality: The case of adjectives , 1989 .
[44] E. Martin. Truth and translation , 1972 .
[45] François Recanati,et al. On Defining Communicative Intentions , 1986 .
[46] François Recanati,et al. Does Linguistic Communication Rest on Inference , 2002 .
[47] J. Hintikka. Semantics for Propositional Attitudes , 1969 .
[48] Richard J. Gerrig,et al. Contextual influences on the comprehension of complex concepts , 1992 .
[49] R. Carston. Thoughts and Utterances , 2002 .
[50] J. Searle. The Background of Meaning , 1980 .
[51] Douglas L. Hintzman,et al. Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .
[52] François Récanati,et al. The Alleged Priority of Literal Interpretation , 1995, Cogn. Sci..
[53] D. Sperber,et al. Truthfulness and Relevance , 2002 .
[54] Bradley Franks,et al. Sense Generation: A "Quasi-Classical" Approach to Concepts and Concept Combination , 1995, Cogn. Sci..
[55] James F. Ross,et al. Portraying analogy: Subject index , 1982 .
[56] Gregory L. Murphy,et al. Comprehending Complex Concepts , 1988, Cogn. Sci..
[57] C. Fillmore. FRAME SEMANTICS AND THE NATURE OF LANGUAGE * , 1976 .
[58] Laurence R. Horn. The Said and the Unsaid , 1992 .
[59] D. Medin,et al. Context and structure in conceptual combination , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.
[60] G. Nunberg. Indexicality and deixis , 1993 .
[61] Thomas J. McKay,et al. Natural kind terms and standards of membership , 1979 .
[62] Kenneth A. Taylor,et al. Sex, Breakfast, And Descriptus Interruptus , 2001, Synthese.
[63] F. Récanati. Insinuation et sous-entendu , 1979 .
[64] Simon Garrod,et al. The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension. , 1998 .
[65] Richard E. Grandy. UNDERSTANDING AND THE PRINCIPLE OF COMPOSITIONALITY , 1990 .
[66] R. Carston. Linguistic Meaning, Communicated Meaning and Cognitive Pragmatics , 2002 .
[67] L. Barsalou,et al. Ad hoc categories , 1983, Memory & cognition.
[68] F. Récanati. Referential/attributive: A contextualist proposal , 1989 .
[69] J. Moravcsik. Is Snow White , 1994 .
[70] Deirdre Wilson,et al. IX—Loose Talk , 1986 .
[71] D Sperber,et al. The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon (Reprint of Sperber & Wilson 1998) , 1998 .
[72] Gregory L. Murphy,et al. Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination , 1990 .
[73] L. Cohen,et al. Some Remarks on Grice’s Views about the Logical Particles of Natural Language , 1975 .
[74] Geoffrey Nunberg,et al. Transfers of Meaning , 1995, J. Semant..
[75] J. Stanley. Context and Logical Form , 2000 .
[76] F. Récanati,et al. IV—Contextual Dependence and Definite Descriptions , 1987 .