PET-based estradiol challenge as a predictive biomarker of response to endocrine therapy in women with estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer

Purpose To determine if response to endocrine therapy of breast cancer can be predicted by either a metabolic “flare reaction” detected by positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG), induced by an estradiol challenge, or by estrogen-receptor (ER) status, determined by PET with the estrogen analog 16α-[18F]fluoroestradiol-17β (FES). Methods Fifty-one post-menopausal women with advanced estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer were studied. Patients underwent FES-PET and FDG-PET at baseline and repeat FDG-PET after 30 mg estradiol. Tracer uptakes was measured as the standardized uptake value (SUV). Patients were subsequently treated with either an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant. A prospectively defined cut-off SUV ≥ 2 for FES was considered positive for ER expression. A cutoff of ≥12% increase in SUV for FDG, determined by ROC analysis, represented metabolic flare. PET results were correlated with responsiveness to endocrine therapy. Results Seventeen patients responded and 34 patients did not respond to endocrine therapy. Four responders and one non-responder had a clinical flare reaction, while only the responders demonstrated metabolic flare. After estradiol challenge, a significantly higher mean (±SD) percent change in SUV for FDG was noted in responders (20.9 ± 24.2) compared with non-responders (−4.3 ± 11.0, P < 0.0001). On FES-PET, a higher tumor SUV was noted in responders (3.5 ± 2.5) compared with non-responders (2.1 ± 1.8, P = 0.0049). There was significantly longer overall survival in patients with metabolic flare than in those without flare regardless of type of endocrine therapy (P = 0.0062). Conclusion Baseline tumor FES uptake and metabolic flare after an estradiol challenge are both predictive of responsiveness to endocrine therapy in ER+ breast cancer.

[1]  A. Howell,et al.  Fulvestrant, formerly ICI 182,780, is as effective as anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing after prior endocrine treatment. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  C. Boni,et al.  Superior efficacy of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of a phase III study of the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  J E Mortimer,et al.  Positron tomographic assessment of estrogen receptors in breast cancer: comparison with FDG-PET and in vitro receptor assays. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  R. Schiff,et al.  Breast cancer endocrine resistance: how growth factor signaling and estrogen receptor coregulators modulate response. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[5]  D. Jewett,et al.  Routine production of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose by direct nucleophilic exchange on a quaternary 4-aminopyridinium resin. , 1990, International journal of radiation applications and instrumentation. Part B, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[6]  D. Hayes,et al.  Worsening bone scan in the evaluation of antitumor response during hormonal therapy of breast cancer. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  M. Welch,et al.  Application of robotics to radiopharmaceutical preparation: controlled synthesis of fluorine-18 16 alpha-fluoroestradiol-17 beta. , 1986, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  P. Goss,et al.  Aromatase inhibitors in the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  G. Kimmick,et al.  Current status of endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer. , 1995, Oncology.

[10]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Performance evaluation of the whole-body PET scanner ECAT EXACT HR + , 1997 .

[11]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Quantitative fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography imaging predicts response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  M. Mintun,et al.  Positron tomographic assessment of 16 alpha-[18F] fluoro-17 beta-estradiol uptake in metastatic breast carcinoma. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  D. W. Moss,et al.  Bone scan flare predicts successful systemic therapy for bone metastases. , 1988, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  H. Degani,et al.  13C NMR kinetic studies of the rapid stimulation of glucose metabolism by estrogen in immature rat uterus , 1994, NMR in biomedicine.

[16]  M. Mintun,et al.  Positron Tomographic Assessment of 16α-[18F] Fluoro-17β-Estradiol Uptake in Metastatic Breast Carcinoma , 1991 .

[17]  M. Welch,et al.  Metabolic flare: indicator of hormone responsiveness in advanced breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  K Wienhard,et al.  The ECAT EXACT HR: Performance of a New High Resolution Positron Scanner , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  P. Cutler,et al.  Local threshold for segmented attenuation correction of PET imaging of the thorax , 1993 .

[20]  P. Bendel,et al.  Tamoxifen induced changes in MCF7 human breast cancer: In vitro and in vivo studies using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and imaging , 1992, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[21]  M. Welch,et al.  Positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and 16alpha-[18F]fluoro-17beta-estradiol in breast cancer: correlation with estrogen receptor status and response to systemic therapy. , 1996, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[22]  S Yoshioka,et al.  Lung tumor imaging by positron emission tomography using C-11 L-methionine. , 1985, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  M. Mintun,et al.  Breast cancer: PET imaging of estrogen receptors. , 1988, Radiology.

[24]  A. G. Jessiman,et al.  Severe exacerbation of cancer of the breast after oöphorectomy and adrenalectomy: report of four cases. , 1958, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  A. Buzdar,et al.  Tamoxifen‐induced hypercalcemia in breast cancer , 1981, Cancer.

[26]  M Van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[27]  P. Rosen,et al.  Tamoxifen flare in advanced breast cancer. , 1978, JAMA.

[28]  V. Jordan,et al.  The apoptotic action of estrogen following exhaustive antihormonal therapy: a new clinical treatment strategy. , 2005, Breast.

[29]  S Grootoonk,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the Positron Scanner ECAT EXACT , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[30]  A. Nobel,et al.  Concordance among Gene-Expression – Based Predictors for Breast Cancer , 2011 .

[31]  L. Dirix,et al.  Exemestane is superior to megestrol acetate after tamoxifen failure in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of a phase III randomized double-blind trial. The Exemestane Study Group. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  Michael J. Welch,et al.  Positron emission tomographic assessment of ”metabolic flare” to predict response of metastatic breast cancer to antiestrogen therapy , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[33]  D. W. Moss,et al.  Biochemical prediction of response of bone metastases to treatment. , 1988, British Journal of Cancer.