Bronchodilator Responsiveness in Swine Veterinarians

Abstract Objective: Swine veterinarians are known to be at risk for respiratory symptoms and airflow obstruction. The present study reassessed the prevalence of respiratory complaints and pulmonary function abnormalities in swine veterinarians and sought to characterize their response to bronchodilators. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted during the American Association of Swine Veterinarians annual meeting. Subjects completed a respiratory symptom and workplace exposure history questionnaire and spirometry. Subjects with airflow obstruction were assessed for a post-bronchodilator response with beta 2 agonist administration. Results: Participants included 58 veterinarians (mean age, 45.5 years). Work-related symptoms assessed by questionnaire included rhinitis symptoms (60.3%), cough and chest tightness (55.2%), and wheezing (35.1%). Airflow obstruction was detected in 11/58 (19%) of subjects by spirometry. Only 2/9 (22.2%) met American Thoracic Society criteria for reversibility with bronchodilator administration. Conclusions: Respiratory symptoms and airway obstruction remain common findings in swine veterinarians. Airflow obstruction was not consistently reversible with beta agonists, suggesting that swine barn exposure may be a risk factor for irreversible airflow obstruction.

[1]  L. Palmberg,et al.  The effect of fluticasone on the airway inflammatory response to organic dust , 2004, European Respiratory Journal.

[2]  Kelley J Donham,et al.  Respiratory symptoms and airway obstruction in swine veterinarians: a persistent problem. , 2004, American journal of industrial medicine.

[3]  D. Judd Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma: update on selected topics 2002. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners.

[4]  B. Danuser,et al.  Prevalence and risk factors for airway diseases in farmers--summary of results of the European Farmers' Project. , 2002, Annals of agricultural and environmental medicine : AAEM.

[5]  R. Pauwels,et al.  Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop summary. , 2001, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[6]  Christine Jenkins,et al.  GOLD SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE. GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR THE DIAGNOSIS, MANAGEMENT, AND PREVENTION OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE. NHLBI/WHO GLOBAL INITIATIVE FOR CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE (COLD) WORKSHOP SUMMARY , 2001 .

[7]  R. Jolie,et al.  Health problems in veterinary students after visiting a commercial swine farm. , 1998, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[8]  S. V. Von Essen,et al.  Respiratory tract inflammation in swine confinement workers studied using induced sputum and exhaled nitric oxide. , 1998, Journal of toxicology. Clinical toxicology.

[9]  R. Jolie,et al.  Airborne contaminants and farmers health in swine farms with high and low prevalence of respiratory diseases in pigs. , 1998, Annals of agricultural and environmental medicine : AAEM.

[10]  M. Laviolette,et al.  Effects of repeated swine building exposures on normal naive subjects. , 1997, The European respiratory journal.

[11]  H. Folgering,et al.  Bronchial hyperresponsiveness and exposure in pig farmers , 1997, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[12]  L. Burmeister,et al.  Longitudinal evaluation of dose-response relationships for environmental exposures and pulmonary function in swine production workers. , 1996, American journal of industrial medicine.

[13]  R. Langley,et al.  Occupational hazards reported by swine veterinarians in the United States , 1996 .

[14]  John L. Hankinson,et al.  Standardization of Spirometry, 1994 Update. American Thoracic Society. , 1995, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[15]  L. Burmeister,et al.  Respiratory dysfunction in swine production facility workers: dose-response relationships of environmental exposures and pulmonary function. , 1995, American journal of industrial medicine.

[16]  D. Schwartz,et al.  Determinants of longitudinal changes in spirometric function among swine confinement operators and farmers. , 1995, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[17]  L. Boulet,et al.  Respiratory health of workers exposed to swine confinement buildings only or to both swine confinement buildings and dairy barns. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[18]  L. Burmeister,et al.  Preventing respiratory disease in swine confinement workers: intervention through applied epidemiology, education, and consultation. , 1990, American journal of industrial medicine.

[19]  S. Samuels,et al.  Prevalence of hazardous exposures in veterinary practice. , 1989, American journal of industrial medicine.

[20]  K. Donham,et al.  Respiratory symptoms and lung function among workers in swine confinement buildings: a cross-sectional epidemiological study. , 1984, Archives of environmental health.

[21]  K J Donham,et al.  Potential health hazards to agricultural workers in swine confinement buildings. , 1977, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[22]  M. Lebowitz,et al.  The maximal expiratory flow-volume curve. Normal standards, variability, and effects of age. , 1976, The American review of respiratory disease.