Bovine somatotropin: review of an emerging animal technology.

One of the first potential biotechnology products for animal production is bST. Research in the technology of bST has involved scientists and support from federal agencies, universities, and private industry. As a consequence of this extensive cooperation, more than 1000 bST studies have been conducted, which involved over 20,000 dairy cows, and results have been confirmed by scientists throughout the world. This quantity of published research is unprecedented for a new technology and greater than most dairy technologies in use. In contrast to steroids, bST is a protein hormone. Milk yield and persistency responses to bST have been observed for all dairy breeds examined. Quality of management is the major factor affecting magnitude of milk response to bST. The mechanism of action of bST involves a series of orchestrated changes in the metabolism of body tissues so that more nutrients can be used for milk synthesis. It is these coordinated changes that allow the animal to achieve an increased milk yield while remaining normal and healthy. Bioenergetic studies demonstrated that bST-supplemented animals are not stressed. Similarly, there are no adverse health effects from bST even under poor management conditions. Composition of milk (fat, protein, lactose, cholesterol, minerals, and vitamins) is not substantially altered when bST is used and does not differ in manufacturing characteristics. Public perception is of paramount importance if bST or any new technology is to be effectively implemented. New technology must be understood and perceived as safe and beneficial both by farmers, who would utilize it, and consumers, who would purchase the dairy products. With bST use, a unit of milk is produced with less feed and protein supplement and with a reduction in animal excreta (manure, urine, and methane). Nationally, the use of bST simply reinforces, but does not fundamentally change, dairy industry trends of increased milk yield per cow, reduced number of cows, and declining dairy farm numbers. For individual farms, bST technology is size-neutral. However, poorly managed farms where animals are stressed, underfed, or sick are at an economic disadvantage because they will achieve negligible milk response to bST.

[1]  J. Hocquette,et al.  The human liver growth hormone receptor. , 1989, Endocrinology.

[2]  D. Kronfeld,et al.  Major metabolic determinants of milk volume, mammary efficiency, and spontaneous ketosis in dairy cows. , 1982, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  G. J. Asimov,et al.  The lactogenic preparations from the anterior pituitary and the increase of milk yield in cows. , 1937 .

[4]  F. Young EXPERIEMENTAL STIMULATION (GALACTOPOIESIS) OF LACTATION , 1947 .

[5]  L. Fiems Designing foods: Animal product options in the marketplace , 1990 .

[6]  I. Johnsson 5 – MANIPULATION OF MILK YIELD WITH GROWTH HORMONE , 1988 .

[7]  J. Mcclelland,et al.  THE DEMAND FOR FOOD SAFETY: AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON RECOMBINANT DNA‐DERIVED ANIMAL GROWTH HORMONES , 1988 .

[8]  H. Erb,et al.  Effect of 188-day treatment with somatotropin on health and reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows. , 1987, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  D. Bauman,et al.  Effect of somatotropin on kinetics of nonesterified fatty acids and partition of energy, carbon, and nitrogen in lactating dairy cows. , 1989, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  Y. Chilliard Long-term effects of recombinant bovine somatotropin (rBST) on dairy cow performances , 1988 .

[11]  A. O. Refsdal,et al.  Urea Concentration in Bulk Milk as an Indicator of the Protein Supply at the Herd Level , 1985, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.

[12]  D. Bauman,et al.  Effect of bovine somatotropin on metabolism of lactating dairy cows: energy and nitrogen utilization as determined by respiration calorimetry. , 1988, The Journal of nutrition.

[13]  D. Bauman,et al.  Responses of high-producing dairy cows to long-term treatment with pituitary somatotropin and recombinant somatotropin. , 1985, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  H. Erb,et al.  Rates of diagnosis of six diseases of Holstein cows during 15-day and 21-day intervals. , 1984, American journal of veterinary research.

[15]  Kronfeld Ds Coping with a buildup of waste anesthetic gases. , 1989 .

[16]  D. Galligan,et al.  Nutritional implications of somatotropin for lactating cows. , 1989, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  R. Collier,et al.  Effect of acute challenge with an extreme dose of somatotropin in a prolonged-release formulation on milk production and health of dairy cattle. , 1990, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  W R Butler,et al.  Interrelationships between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function in dairy cattle. , 1989, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  J. Abrams Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition , 1982 .

[20]  D E Bauman,et al.  Partitioning of nutrients during pregnancy and lactation: a review of mechanisms involving homeostasis and homeorhesis. , 1980, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  D. Bauman,et al.  Biotechnology and the Dairy Industry: Production Costs and Commercial Potential of the Bovine Growth Hormone , 1984 .

[22]  J C Juskevich,et al.  Bovine growth hormone: human food safety evaluation. , 1990, Science.

[23]  T. Etherton Clinical review 21: The efficacy and safety of growth hormone for animal agriculture. , 1991, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[24]  R. Kalter,et al.  Bovine Somatotropin: Its Impact on the Spatial Distribution of the U.S. Dairy Industry , 1989 .

[25]  R. Fallert BST and the dairy industry : a national, regional, and farm-level analysis , 1987 .

[26]  R. Heap,et al.  Biotechnology in Growth Regulation , 1989 .

[27]  I. Hart,et al.  Metabolic limits to milk production, especially roles of growth hormone and insulin. , 1982, Journal of dairy science.

[28]  I. Johnsson 8 – MANIPULATION OF MILK YIELD WITH GROWTH HORMONE , 1986 .

[29]  C. Kotts,et al.  CHANGES IN INSULIN AND SOMATOMEDIN RECEPTORS AND UPTAKE OF INSULIN, IGF-I AND IGF-II DURING MAMMARY GROWTH, LACTOGENESIS AND LACTATION , 1989 .

[30]  S. Epstein Potential Public Health Hazards of Biosynthetic Milk Hormones , 1990, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[31]  K. Sejrsen,et al.  Use of somatotropin in livestock production , 1989 .

[32]  B. Vonderhaar,et al.  Crystallization and preliminary x-ray characterization of bovine growth hormone. Purification of bovine prolactin and growth hormone. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[33]  J. Wypych,et al.  Recombinant-DNA-derived bovine growth hormone from Escherichia coli. 2. Biochemical, biophysical, immunological and biological comparison with the pituitary hormone. , 1987, European journal of biochemistry.

[34]  L. D. Vleck 12 – Potential Genetic Impact of Artificial Insemination, Sex Selection, Embryo Transfer, Cloning, and Selfing in Dairy Cattle , 1981 .

[35]  D. Bauman,et al.  Somatotropin and lactation. , 1987, Journal of dairy science.

[36]  C. Shumway,et al.  Economic Value of Days Open for Holstein Cows of Alternative Milk Yields with Varying Calving Intervals , 1984 .

[37]  B. Poutrel Susceptibility to mastitis: a review of factors related to the cow. , 1982, Annales de recherches veterinaires. Annals of veterinary research.

[38]  D. Kronfeld GROWTH HORMONE-INDUCED KETOSIS IN THE COW. , 1965, Journal of dairy science.

[39]  D. Bauman,et al.  Sources of variation and prospects for improvement of productive efficiency in the dairy cow: a review. , 1985, Journal of animal science.

[40]  L. Machlin Effect of growth hormone on milk production and feed utilization in dairy cows. , 1973, Journal of dairy science.

[41]  T. Boone,et al.  Recombinant-DNA-derived bovine growth hormone from Escherichia coli. 1. Demonstration that the hormone is expressed in reduced form, and isolation of the hormone in oxidized, native form. , 1987, European journal of biochemistry.

[42]  G. W. Trimberger Conception Rates in Dairy Cattle from Services at Various Intervals after Parturition , 1954 .

[43]  Leveridge Ll Meeting the challenges of new technology. , 1981 .

[44]  M. Wallis,et al.  THE MOLECULAR EVOLUTION OF PITUITARY HORMONES , 1975, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[45]  Limits to Intensive Production in Animals , 1951, Nature.

[46]  T. Elsasser,et al.  Bioactivity of milk from bST-treated cows. , 1990, The Journal of nutrition.

[47]  D. Barbano,et al.  Bovine somatotropin supplementation of dairy cows. Is the milk safe? , 1990, JAMA.

[48]  J. Novakofski,et al.  Hormonal Regulation of the Age‐Associated Decline in Immune Function a , 1987, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[49]  D. C. Wood,et al.  Purification and characterization of pituitary bovine somatotropin. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.