Extended latent class approach to the study of familial/sporadic forms of a disease: Its application to the study of the heterogeneity of schizophrenia

When no method exists for detecting genetic forms of a disorder, epidemiologists classify probands according to the presence or absence of an affected relative (familial or sporadic). Not only is this a surrogate measure but if the risk for the disorder is associated with characteristics such as age and gender, then probands with varied distributions of these characteristics among their relatives are subject to misclassification. A latent class approach is presented which explicitly models the relationship between the affected status of the relatives and the unobservable familial/sporadic status of the proband in order to adjust for these characteristics. Lastly, an approach is introduced to correct for attenuation in measures of association between familial/sporadic status and other variables that could result if probands are misclassified. This approach incorporates the latent class probabilities directly into the regression model without classifying probands. These methods are applied to a study of theheterogeneity of schizophrenia.

[1]  J. McGrath,et al.  Schizophrenia: gender and familial risk. , 1992, Journal of psychiatric research.

[2]  D. Rao,et al.  Availability of schizophrenic patients and their families for genetic linkage studies: Findings from the Maryland epidemiology sample , 1989, Genetic epidemiology.

[3]  W. Carpenter,et al.  Risk Factors in Schizophrenia , 1992, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[4]  I. Bross Misclassification in 2 X 2 Tables , 1954 .

[5]  S. Faraone,et al.  Familial and sporadic schizophrenia A simulation study of statistical power , 1989, Schizophrenia Research.

[6]  C Brownie,et al.  The effects of exposure misclassification on estimates of relative risk. , 1986, American journal of epidemiology.

[7]  R. Anderson,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECT OF MISCLASSIFICATION ON THE PROPERTIES OF CHI-2-TESTS IN THE ANALYSIS OF CATEGORICAL DATA. , 1965, Biometrika.

[8]  S. Faraone,et al.  Heterogeneity of Schizophrenia , 1990, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[9]  S. Faraone,et al.  Gender and schizophrenia: Implications for understanding the heterogeneity of the illness , 1989, Psychiatry Research.

[10]  R. Murray,et al.  The Familial/Sporadic Distinction as a Strategy in Schizophrenia Research , 1987, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[11]  P. McGuffin,et al.  Problems and pitfalls of the family history positive and negative dichotomy: response to Dalén. , 1990, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[12]  K. Kendler,et al.  Sporadic vs familial classification given etiologic heterogeneity: I. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value , 1987, Genetic epidemiology.

[13]  K. Weiss,et al.  A method to detect excess risk of disease in structured data: Cancer in relatives of retinoblastoma patients , 1984, Genetic epidemiology.

[14]  J. McGrath,et al.  Schizophrenia: age at onset, gender and familial risk , 1990, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[15]  K. Kendler The sporadic v. familial classification given aetiological heterogeneity: II. Power analyses , 1988, Psychological Medicine.

[16]  A. Pulver,et al.  An epidemiologic investigation of alcohol‐dependent schizophrenics , 1989, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[17]  K. Liang,et al.  Adjustment for non-differential misclassification error in the generalized linear model. , 1991, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  H Checkoway,et al.  Bias due to misclassification in the estimation of relative risk. , 1977, American journal of epidemiology.