MEG detects neural consequences of anomalous nasalization in vowel–consonant pairs

This study identifies a delay in the neuromagnetic activity evoked by passive auditory presentation of anomalous speech sound combinations. Vowel-consonant-vowel (VCV) stimuli were constructed to manipulate vowel nasalization in violation of the patterns of English, in which vowel nasalization ordinarily arises as a predictable coarticulatory effect of anticipatory velum lowering for production of a following nasal consonant. For anomalous stimuli with V1 and C mismatched in nasalization, the neural response to C was delayed relative to congruent control stimuli with V1 and C matched for nasalization. As both anomalous and control stimuli represent linguistically possible speech sound sequences, the temporal disparity in evoked neuromagnetic activity in English speakers reflects a role for language-specific phonological knowledge at the earliest stages of auditory processing.

[1]  P. Alku,et al.  Event-related potential indices of auditory vowel processing in 3-year-old children , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  R Näätänen,et al.  Pre-attentive detection of vowel contrasts utilizes both phonetic and auditory memory representations. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[3]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Language-specific phoneme representations revealed by electric and magnetic brain responses , 1997, Nature.

[4]  Holger Mitterer,et al.  Coping with phonological assimilation in speech perception: Evidence for early compensation , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Abstract phoneme representations in the left temporal cortex: magnetic mismatch negativity study , 2002, Neuroreport.

[6]  W. Roberts,et al.  Prominence of M50 auditory evoked response over M100 in childhood and autism , 2004, Neuroreport.

[7]  David Poeppel,et al.  Visual speech speeds up the neural processing of auditory speech. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  D. B. Fry.  The Physics of Speech: Acoustic features of English sounds , 1979 .

[9]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Phonological Processing: A Cross-linguistic Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Processing of vowels in supratemporal auditory cortex , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.

[11]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Auditory cortical activation in Finnish and Swedish speaking Finns: a magnetoencephalographic study , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[12]  Jonas Obleser,et al.  Magnetic Brain Response Mirrors Extraction of Phonological Features from Spoken Vowels , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Auditory Cortex Accesses Phonological Categories: An MEG Mismatch Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon , 1991, Cognition.

[15]  A. Lahiri,et al.  Neurobiological Evidence for Abstract Phonological Representations in the Mental Lexicon during Speech Recognition , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  C A Fowler,et al.  Perceptual parsing of acoustic consequences of velum lowering from information for vowels , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  P. Kuhl.  Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.