Modeling the temporal coordination of behavior and internal states

One of the key phenomena that distinguish couples and social groups from mere collections of individuals is the coordination of individual thoughts, feelings, and actions that occurs in social interaction. The importance of coordination for social relations is reflected in common wisdom, where individuals who are connected by a satisfying social relationship are often termed to "be on the same wavelength" or to "resonate with one another," whereas those in a problematic relationship are said to be "out of synch with each other." Coordination may take many different forms and involve different specific mechanisms. In organizations, for example, the coordination of individual actions is of the primary concern, since the productivity of the group depends to a high degree on the quality of coordination of individual actions. In close relationships, on the other hand, coordination of feelings and thoughts may be more important since it directly affects the degree of satisfaction with the relationship. The lack of synchrony and mutual understanding is a source of dissatisfaction in marriages and other close relationships. Despite the wide variety of phenomena associated with coordination, there is reason to believe that many aspects of coordination are invariant across phenomena.

[1]  B. Latané,et al.  From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. , 1990 .

[2]  D. Wegner,et al.  On being cool and collected: mood regulation in anticipation of social interaction. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  金子 邦彦 Theory and applications of coupled map lattices , 1993 .

[4]  T. Newcomb The acquaintance process , 1961 .

[5]  Gavan Lintern,et al.  Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior , 1997, Complex.

[6]  J. McGrath,et al.  Time and human interaction : toward a social psychology of time , 1986 .

[7]  B. Hopkins,et al.  Four requirements for a dynamical systems approach to the development of social coordination , 1992 .

[8]  Wander Jager,et al.  Applications of simulation to social sciences , 2000 .

[9]  F. Heider,et al.  Principles of topological psychology , 1936 .

[10]  Kunihiko Kaneko,et al.  Theory and Applications of Coupled Map Lattices , 1993 .

[11]  Ying-Cheng Lai,et al.  Controlling chaos , 1994 .

[12]  G. Clore,et al.  The attraction hypothesis: do similar attitudes affect anything? , 1986 .

[13]  Shinbrot Synchronization of coupled maps and stable windows. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[14]  D. Wegner,et al.  On being cool and collected: Mood regulation in anticipation of social interaction. , 1996 .

[15]  A. Opstal Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior , 1995 .

[16]  P J Beek,et al.  Dynamical substructure of coordinated rhythmic movements. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  E. Gardner The space of interactions in neural network models , 1988 .

[18]  SYNCHRONIZATION OF THE TRAJECTORY AS A WAY TO CONTROL THE DYNAMICS OF A COUPLED SYSTEM , 1997 .

[19]  Darren Newtson,et al.  The Structure of Action and Interaction , 1987 .

[20]  Kaneko Chaotic but regular posi-nega switch among coded attractors by cluster-size variation. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[21]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  Dynamical Social Psychology , 1998 .

[22]  B. Hillier,et al.  The Social Logic of Space , 1984 .

[23]  Edward Ott,et al.  Controlling chaos , 2006, Scholarpedia.

[24]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[25]  P. Lazarsfeld Principles of Topological Psychology , 1938 .

[26]  Linda Tickle-Degnen,et al.  Group rapport and nonverbal behavior. , 1987 .