Crowdsourcing Literature Reviews in New Domains

A standard approach to exploring a domain is to conduct a literature review. However, conducting a literature review in a new domain presents unique challenges. Whereas in an existing domain, researchers can use established classifications of knowledge to guide their search for and interpretation of the literature, this is not the case for a new domain that lacks such classifications. In a new domain, the literature is typically broad, fragmented, and, at the same time, growing quickly. The task of the researcher is to make sense of evidence when it does not fit existing models and classifications. Encountering such evidence forces them to extend existing knowledge.

[1]  Maria J Grant,et al.  A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. , 2009, Health information and libraries journal.

[2]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Ensemble: exploring complementary strengths of leaders and crowds in creative collaboration , 2014, CSCW.

[3]  Daniel M. Berry,et al.  The importance of ignorance in requirements engineering , 1995, J. Syst. Softw..

[4]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Crowdlines: Supporting Synthesis of Diverse Information Sources through Crowdsourced Outlines , 2015, HCOMP.

[5]  G. Lanckriet,et al.  Crowdsourcing the Unknown: The Satellite Search for Genghis Khan , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Beat the Machine: Challenging Workers to Find the Unknown Unknowns , 2011, Human Computation.

[7]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Crowd synthesis: extracting categories and clusters from complex data , 2014, CSCW.

[8]  D. Allison,et al.  Using Crowdsourcing to Evaluate Published Scientific Literature: Methods and Example , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  Trevor Owens,et al.  Digital Cultural Heritage and the Crowd , 2013 .

[10]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Writing Narrative Literature Reviews , 1997, Review of General Psychology.

[11]  J. Hayes,et al.  A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing , 1981, College Composition & Communication.

[12]  Ida Sim,et al.  #CochraneTech: technology and the future of systematic reviews. , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[13]  Guy Paré,et al.  Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[14]  D. M. Berry,et al.  Role of Domain Ignorance in Software Development : Software Development Tasks Benefiting from Domain Ignorance , 2012 .

[15]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction and Collective Intelligence , 2014 .

[16]  B. Green,et al.  Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. , 2006, Journal of chiropractic medicine.