Rapid training of image classifiers through adaptive, multi-frame sampling method

Computer vision methods, such as automatic target recognition (ATR) techniques, have the potential to improve the accuracy of military systems for weapon deployment and targeting, resulting in greater utility and reduced collateral damage. A major challenge, however, is training the ATR algorithm to the specific environment and mission. Because of the wide range of operating conditions encountered in practice, advanced training based on a pre-selected training set may not provide the robust performance needed. Training on a mission-specific image set is a promising approach, but requires rapid selection of a small, but highly representative training set to support time-critical operations. To remedy these problems and make short-notice seeker missions a reality, we developed learning and mining using bagged augmented decision trees (LAMBAST). LAMBAST examines large databases and extracts sparse, representative subsets of target and clutter samples of interest. For data mining, LAMBAST uses a variant of decision trees, called random decision trees (RDTs). This approach guards against overfitting and can incorporate novel, mission-specific data after initial training via perpetual learning. We augment these trees with a distribution modeling component that eliminates redundant information, ignores misrepresentative class distributions in the database, and stops training when decision boundaries are sufficiently sampled. These augmented random decision trees enable fast investigation of multiple images to train a reliable, mission-specific ATR. This paper presents the augmented random decision tree framework, develops the sampling procedure for efficient construction of the sample, and illustrates the procedure using relevant examples.

[1]  R. Suganya,et al.  Data Mining Concepts and Techniques , 2010 .

[2]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  The Design and Use of Steerable Filters , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Brenda K. Wiederhold,et al.  ECG to identify individuals , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[4]  Daren Yu,et al.  Constructing Rough Decision Forests , 2005, RSFDGrC.

[5]  Vili Podgorelec,et al.  Decision trees , 2018, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[6]  Andrew W. Moore,et al.  A multiple tree algorithm for the efficient association of asteroid observations , 2005, KDD '05.

[7]  Magnus Snorrason,et al.  Searching for a fast alternative to KNN for infrared ATR , 2007, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[8]  Bruce A. Draper,et al.  Goal-Directed Classification Using Linear Machine Decision Trees , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Jing Peng,et al.  Empirical comparison of robustness of classifiers on IR imagery , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[10]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Effective estimation of posterior probabilities: explaining the accuracy of randomized decision tree approaches , 2005, Fifth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'05).

[11]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Is random model better? On its accuracy and efficiency , 2003, Third IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[12]  Vincent Lepetit,et al.  Randomized trees for real-time keypoint recognition , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[13]  Min Chen,et al.  A decision tree-based multimodal data mining framework for soccer goal detection , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8763).

[14]  Rich Caruana,et al.  An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms , 2006, ICML.

[15]  W. Todd Scruggs,et al.  eigenPulse: Robust human identification from cardiovascular function , 2008, Pattern Recognit..

[16]  Min Chen,et al.  A multimodal data mining framework for soccer goal detection based on decision tree logic , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol..