Objectivity in Experimental Inquiry: Breaking Data-Technique Circles

I respond to H. M. Collins's claim (1985, 1990, 1993) that experimental inquiry cannot be objective because the only criterium experimentalists have for determining whether a technique is "working" is the production of "correct" (i.e., the expected) data. Collins claims that the "experimenters' regress," the name he gives to this data-technique circle, cannot be broken using the resources of experiment alone. I argue that the data-technique circle, can be broken even though any interpretation of the raw data produced by techniques is theory-dependent. However, it is possible to break this circle by eliminating dependence on even those theoretical presuppositions that are shared by an entire scientific community through the use of multiple independently theory-dependent techniques to produce robust bodies of data. Moreover, I argue, that it is the production of robust bodies of data that convinces experimentalists of the objectivity of their data interpretations.

[1]  K. Murray,et al.  Recognition sequence of restriction endonuclease III from Hemophilus influenzae. , 1975, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  J. Woodward,et al.  Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World , 1988 .

[3]  Peter Slezak,et al.  Artificial Experts , 1992, Science.

[4]  W. Gilbert,et al.  The nucleotide sequence of the lac operator. , 1973, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  O. Penrose.  The Direction of Time , 1962 .

[6]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[7]  F. Sanger,et al.  Nucleotide sequence of bacteriophage φX174 DNA , 1977, Nature.

[8]  P. Kosso,et al.  Observability and observation in physical science , 1989 .

[9]  I. Hacking,et al.  Representing and Intervening. , 1986 .

[10]  Allan Franklin,et al.  Experiment, right or wrong , 1990 .

[11]  Robert John Ackermann,et al.  Data, instruments, and theory , 1985 .

[12]  J. Sutcliffe,et al.  Nucleotide sequence of the ampicillin resistance gene of Escherichia coli plasmid pBR322. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  J. Costerton.  The role of electron microscopy in the elucidation of bacterial structure and function. , 1979, Annual review of microbiology.

[14]  L. Daston,et al.  The Image of Objectivity , 1992 .

[15]  P. Owen,et al.  Bacterial membrane structure. , 1976, Annual review of microbiology.

[16]  Nicolas Rasmussen,et al.  Facts, artifacts, and mesosomes: Practicing epistemology with the electron microscope , 1993 .

[17]  E. D. Hyman.  A new method of sequencing DNA. , 1988, Analytical biochemistry.

[18]  Sylvia Culp,et al.  Defending Robustness: The Bacterial Mesosome as a Test Case , 1994, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[19]  G. K. Scott,et al.  Partial amino acid sequence of penicillinase coded by Escherichia coli plasmid R6K. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Donald T. Campbell,et al.  Scientific inquiry and the social sciences , 1981 .

[21]  William C. Wimsatt,et al.  Complexity and Organization , 1972 .

[22]  William C. Wimsatt,et al.  Taming the Dimensions-Visualizations in Science , 1990, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[23]  L. Taylor,et al.  The Neglect of Experiment , 1986 .

[24]  F. Sanger,et al.  DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.