Probing the potential of non-verbal group communication

Designing for non-verbal communication using e.g. gestures and other bodily expressions is difficult. Hardware and software need to be co-designed and harmonize in order to not throw users out of their embodied experience. We aim to design for kinaesthetic expressions of emotion in communication between friends - in this case, colleagues at work. A probe was built using sensor node technology designed to let users express themselves and their emotional state to a public and shared display where the expressions together formed a collective art piece expressing the individuals but also the group as a whole. Two groups of colleagues used the probe during two weeks. It came to serve as a channel in which some conflicts and expressions of social relations were acted out which were not openly discussed in the office. It exposed different roles and balances in relationships in the group. Finally, the probe taught us the importance of balancing the design for joint group expression and individual, personal expressions. The study also allowed the participants to experience the sensor node-'material' - enabling a participatory design process.

[1]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group , 1992, CHI.

[2]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Design: Cultural probes , 1999, INTR.

[3]  Konrad Tollmar,et al.  Virtually living together , 2000, DIS '00.

[4]  Konrad Tollmar,et al.  Virtually Living Together: A Design Framework for New Communication Media. , 2000 .

[5]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[6]  E. Vesterinen,et al.  Affective Computing , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[7]  Giulio Jacucci,et al.  Everyday Life as a Stage in Creating and Performing Scenarios for Wireless Devices , 2002, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[8]  Sofia Dahl,et al.  Ghost in the Cave - An Interactive Collaborative Game Using Non-verbal Communication , 2003, Gesture Workshop.

[9]  Allison Druin,et al.  Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families , 2003, CHI '03.

[10]  Kristina Höök,et al.  SenToy: an affective sympathetic interface , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  Wa Wijnand IJsselsteijn,et al.  Staying in touch : social presence and connectedness through synchronous and asynchonous communication media , 2003 .

[12]  D. Norman Emotional design : why we love (or hate) everyday things , 2004 .

[13]  Kirsten Boehner,et al.  Evaluating Affector: Co-Interpreting What “Works” , 2005 .

[14]  R.I.A. Mercuri,et al.  Technology as Experience , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[15]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  From awareness to connectedness: the design and deployment of presence displays , 2006, CHI.

[16]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  The whereabouts clock: early testing of a situated awareness device , 2006, CHI EA '06.

[17]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  HomeNote: supporting situated messaging in the home , 2006, CSCW '06.

[18]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Supple interfaces: designing and evaluating for richer human connections and experiences , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[19]  Kristina Höök,et al.  The sensual evaluation instrument: Developing a trans-cultural self-report measure of affect , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[20]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  The Three Paradigms of HCI , 2007 .

[21]  M. Sile O'Modhrain,et al.  BodySpace: inferring body pose for natural control of a music player , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[22]  Kristina Höök,et al.  In situ informants exploring an emotional mobile messaging system in their everyday practice , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[23]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Empathy and experience in HCI , 2008, CHI.

[24]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Experiencing the Affective Diary , 2009, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[25]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Interactional empowerment , 2008, CHI.

[26]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2008, 2008, Florence, Italy, April 5-10, 2008 , 2005, CHI 2008.