Extraction of Four Premolars in Black Patients with Bi-protrusion: Aesthetic Perceptions of Professionals and Lay People

Objective To assess the aesthetic perceptions and expectations regarding the results of orthodontic treatment for alterations in the profile of Black patients with bi-protrusion through the extraction of four premolars and maximal anchorage. Design Cross-sectional. Setting Offices of plastic surgeons and orthodontists in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Subjects and methods 152 individuals participated in the study and were divided into four groups: Group 1, 38 orthodontists; Group 2, 38 plastic surgeons; Group 3, 38 White laypersons; and Group 4, 38 Black laypersons. The patient sample was composed of six Black individuals (three males and three females) with varying degrees of bi-protrusion. Each participant was shown altered photographs of the profile of the final result of treatment, simulating three different bi-protrusion reduction options (2, 4 and 6 mm), which were united with the original initial and final photographs. Outcomes Aesthetic preferences and expectations regarding the true result of treatment. Data analysis The chi-square test for linear trend with Bonferroni correction (á = P<0·008). Results The aesthetic preference for the majority of participants was for a straighter profile than those provided by the orthodontic treatment. Moreover, the actual profile resulting from the orthodontic treatment was correctly identified by just 22% of the Black laypersons, 22% of the White laypersons, 21% of the orthodontists and 17% of the plastic surgeons. There were significant differences between groups. Conclusions This study supports the view that society perceives straight profiles as aesthetically more pleasing in comparison to protruding or slightly protruding profiles.

[1]  I. Pordeus,et al.  Factors associated with the desire for orthodontic treatment among Brazilian adolescents and their parents , 2009, BMC oral health.

[2]  M. Caplan,et al.  The effect of premolar extractions on the soft-tissue profile in adult African American females. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[3]  M. Woods,et al.  Incisal and soft tissue effects of maxillary premolar extraction in class II treatment. , 2007, The Angle orthodontist.

[4]  I. Pordeus,et al.  Malocclusion: esthetic impact and quality of life among Brazilian schoolchildren. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[5]  Kerianne Greene,et al.  Occlusal perceptions of children seeking orthodontic treatment: impact of ethnicity and socioeconomic status. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  R. Behrents,et al.  Ethnic differences in upper lip response to incisor retraction. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  H. Worthington,et al.  Perceived aesthetic impact of malocclusion and oral self-perceptions in 14-15-year-old Asian and Caucasian children in greater Manchester. , 2000, European journal of orthodontics.

[8]  V. Kalra,et al.  Changes in soft tissue profile of African-Americans following extraction treatment. , 1995, The Angle orthodontist.

[9]  K. Azizi,et al.  Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans--an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations. , 1993, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  S. Kreiborg,et al.  Effect of separate malocclusion traits on concern for dental appearance. , 1986, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology.

[11]  F. Kohout,et al.  Perceptions of occlusal conditions in Australia, the German Democratic Republic and the United States of America. , 1983, International dental journal.

[12]  W. C. Shaw,et al.  Nicknames, Teasing, Harassment and the Salience of Dental Features among School Children , 1980, British journal of orthodontics.

[13]  N I Sushner,et al.  A photographic study of the soft-tissue profile of the Negro population. , 1977, American journal of orthodontics.

[14]  L. D. Garner,et al.  Soft-tissue changes concurrent with orthodontic tooth movement. , 1974, American journal of orthodontics.

[15]  D. Turpin,et al.  A cephalometric study of profile changes in orthodontically treated cases ten years out of retention. , 1973, The Angle orthodontist.

[16]  C J Burstone,et al.  Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. , 1967, American journal of orthodontics.

[17]  R. Ricketts Cephalometric synthesis: An exercise in stating objectives and planning treatment with tracings of the head roentgenogram , 1960 .

[18]  M. Inglehart,et al.  Objective, subjective, and self-assessment of preadolescent orthodontic treatment need--a function of age, gender, and ethnic/racial background? , 2009, Journal of public health dentistry.

[19]  R. Heringer [Racial inequalities in Brazil: a synthesis of social indicators and challenges for public policies]. , 2002, Cadernos de saude publica.

[20]  Rosana Heringer Desigualdades raciais no Brasil: síntese de indicadores e desafios no campo das políticas públicas , 2002 .

[21]  H. G. Hershey Incisor tooth retraction and subsequent profile change in postadolescent female patients. , 1972, American journal of orthodontics.