Changes in the Carriage of CampylobacterStrains by Poultry Carcasses during Processing in Abattoirs

ABSTRACT The recent development of simple, rapid genotyping techniques forCampylobacter species has enabled investigation of the determinative epidemiology of these organisms in a variety of situations. In this study we have used the technique of flatyping (PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of theflaA and flaB genes) to identify the sources of strains contaminating the carcasses of five campylobacter-positive and two campylobacter-negative broiler flocks during abattoir processing. The results confirmed that, in the United Kingdom, individual broiler flocks are colonized by a limited number of subtypes ofCampylobacter jejuni or C. coli. In some but not all cases, the same subtypes, isolated from the ceca, contaminated the end product as observed in carcass washes. However, the culture methodology, i.e, use of direct plating or enrichment, affected this subtype distribution. Moreover, the number of isolates analyzed per sample was limited. fla typing also indicated that some campylobacter subtypes survive poultry processing better than others. The extent of resistance to the environmental stresses during processing varied between strains. The more robust subtypes appeared to contaminate the abattoir environment, surviving through carcass chilling, and even carrying over onto subsequent flocks. From these studies it is confirmed that some campylobacter-negative flocks reach the abattoir but the carcasses from such flocks are rapidly contaminated by various campylobacter subtypes during processing. However, only some of these contaminating subtypes appeared to survive processing. The sources of this contamination are not clear, but in both negative flocks, campylobacters of the same subtypes as those recovered from the carcasses were isolated from the crates used to transport the birds. In one case, this crate contamination was shown to be present before the birds were loaded.

[1]  H R Smith,et al.  A study of infectious intestinal disease in England: microbiological findings in cases and controls. , 1999, Communicable disease and public health.

[2]  B. Duim,et al.  New Developments in the subtyping of campylobacter species , 2000 .

[3]  Robert V. Tauxe,et al.  Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni infections in the United States and other industrialized nations , 2000 .

[4]  S. Cawthraw,et al.  Increased colonization potential of Campylobacter jejuni strain 81116 after passage through chickens and its implication on the rate of transmission within flocks , 1996, Epidemiology and Infection.

[5]  D. Newell,et al.  Restriction fragment length polymorphism of polymerase chain reaction products applied to the differentiation of poultry campylobacters for epidemiological investigations. , 1996, Research in veterinary science.

[6]  M. Hinton,et al.  Effect of changes in processing to improve hygiene control on contamination of poultry carcasses with campylobacter , 1995, Epidemiology and Infection.

[7]  E. Lorenz,et al.  Lineages within Campylobacter jejuni defined by numerical analysis of pulsed-field gel electrophoretic DNA profiles. , 1997, Journal of medical microbiology.

[8]  R. Goodacre,et al.  Identification Methods in Applied and Environmental Microbiology , 1992 .

[9]  M. Blaser,et al.  Campylobacter Jejuni: Current Status and Future Trends , 1992 .

[10]  A. Engvall,et al.  Distribution and numbers of Campylobacter in newly slaughtered broiler chickens and hens. , 1992, International journal of food microbiology.

[11]  J. Wagenaar,et al.  Poultry infections and their control at the farm level , 2000 .

[12]  M. B. Skirrow,et al.  Campylobacter enteritis: a "new" disease. , 1977, British medical journal.

[13]  D. Tompkins,et al.  A study of intestinal infectious disease in England: microbiological findings in cases and controls. , 1999 .