Sensory and cognitive influences on the training-related improvement of reading speed in peripheral vision.

Reading speed in normal peripheral vision is slow but can be increased through training on a letter-recognition task. The aim of the present study is to investigate the sensory and cognitive factors responsible for this improvement. The visual span is hypothesized to be a sensory bottleneck limiting reading speed. Three sensory factors-letter acuity, crowding, and mislocations (errors in the spatial order of letters)-may limit the size of the visual span. Reading speed is also influenced by cognitive factors including the utilization of information from sentence context. We conducted a perceptual training experiment to investigate the roles of these factors. Training consisted of four daily sessions of trigram letter-recognition trials at 10° in the lower visual field. Subjects' visual-span profiles and reading speeds were measured in pre- and posttests. Effects of the three sensory factors were isolated through a decomposition analysis of the visual span profiles. The impact of sentence context was indexed by context gain, the ratio of reading speeds for ordered and unordered text. Following training, visual spans increased in size by 5.4 bits of information transmitted, and reading speeds increased by 45%. Training induced a substantial reduction in the magnitude of crowding (4.8 bits) and a smaller reduction for mislocations (0.7 bits), but no change in letter acuity or context gain. These results indicate that the basis of the training-related improvement in reading speed is a large reduction in the interfering effect of crowding and a small reduction of mislocation errors.

[1]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Dependence of Reading Speed on Letter Spacing in Central Vision Loss , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[2]  G. Legge,et al.  Reduced Crowding Accounts for Enlargement of the Visual Span After Training , 2012 .

[3]  Hye-Won Lee,et al.  Training improves reading speed in peripheral vision: is it due to attention? , 2010, Journal of vision.

[4]  E. Castet,et al.  Small effect of interline spacing on maximal reading speed in low-vision patients with central field loss irrespective of scotoma size. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Development of a training protocol to improve reading performance in peripheral vision , 2010, Vision Research.

[6]  J. Stephen Mansfield,et al.  Contrast polarity differences reduce crowding but do not benefit reading performance in peripheral vision , 2009, Vision Research.

[7]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Precision of position signals for letters , 2009, Vision Research.

[8]  Susana T L Chung,et al.  Reading Speed Does Not Benefit from Increased Line Spacing in AMD Patients , 2008, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[9]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Learning to identify crowded letters: Does it improve reading speed? , 2007, Vision Research.

[10]  D. Pelli,et al.  An escape from crowding. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[11]  Tracey D. Berger,et al.  Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[12]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Relationship between slow visual processing and reading speed in people with macular degeneration , 2007, Vision Research.

[13]  D. Pelli,et al.  Parts, Wholes, and Context in Reading: A Triple Dissociation , 2007, PloS one.

[14]  Sing-Hang Cheung,et al.  The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[15]  Sing-Hang Cheung,et al.  Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[16]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of Reading in Normal and Low Vision , 2006 .

[17]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Low-Vision Reading Speed: Influences of Linguistic Inference and Aging , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[18]  Bosco S. Tjan,et al.  Learning letter identification in peripheral vision , 2005, Vision Research.

[19]  D. Pelli,et al.  Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[20]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Reading Speed Benefits from Increased Vertical Word Spacing in Normal Peripheral Vision , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[21]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Letter-recognition and reading speed in peripheral vision benefit from perceptual learning , 2004, Vision Research.

[22]  Susana T. L. Chung.  The effect of letter spacing on reading speed in central and peripheral vision. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  Gordon E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[24]  K L Petre,et al.  Are the benefits of sentence context different in central and peripheral vision? , 1999, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[25]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. XVIII. The effect of print size on reading speed in normal peripheral vision , 1998, Vision Research.

[26]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[27]  E Peli,et al.  The Role of Context in Reading with Central Field Loss , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[28]  Gary S. Rubin,et al.  Reading without saccadic eye movements , 1992, Vision Research.

[29]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity , 1970 .

[30]  John Morton,et al.  The Effects of Context upon Speed of Reading, Eye Movements and Eye-voice Span , 1964 .

[31]  Robert A Jacobs,et al.  Comparing perceptual learning tasks: a review. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[32]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[33]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[34]  K. Stanovich.  TOWARD AN INTERACTIVE-COMPENSATORY MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF READING FLUENCY , 1980 .