Can sliding-window correlations reveal dynamic functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI?

During the last several years, the focus of research on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has shifted from the analysis of functional connectivity averaged over the duration of scanning sessions to the analysis of changes of functional connectivity within sessions. Although several studies have reported the presence of dynamic functional connectivity (dFC), statistical assessment of the results is not always carried out in a sound way and, in some studies, is even omitted. In this study, we explain why appropriate statistical tests are needed to detect dFC, we describe how they can be carried out and how to assess the performance of dFC measures, and we illustrate the methodology using spontaneous blood-oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI recordings of macaque monkeys under general anesthesia and in human subjects under resting-state conditions. We mainly focus on sliding-window correlations since these are most widely used in assessing dFC, but also consider a recently proposed non-linear measure. The simulations and methodology, however, are general and can be applied to any measure. The results are twofold. First, through simulations, we show that in typical resting-state sessions of 10 min, it is almost impossible to detect dFC using sliding-window correlations. This prediction is validated by both the macaque and the human data: in none of the individual recording sessions was evidence for dFC found. Second, detection power can be considerably increased by session- or subject-averaging of the measures. In doing so, we found that most of the functional connections are in fact dynamic. With this study, we hope to raise awareness of the statistical pitfalls in the assessment of dFC and how they can be avoided by using appropriate statistical methods.

[1]  Richard G. Wise,et al.  Combining fMRI with a Pharmacokinetic Model to Determine Which Brain Areas Activated by Painful Stimulation Are Specifically Modulated by Remifentanil , 2002, NeuroImage.

[2]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Resting-State Functional Connectivity Emerges from Structurally and Dynamically Shaped Slow Linear Fluctuations , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  EEG-correlated fMRI of human alpha activity , 2003, NeuroImage.

[4]  A. Oeltermann,et al.  Hippocampal–cortical interaction during periods of subcortical silence , 2012, Nature.

[5]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  Principal components of functional connectivity: A new approach to study dynamic brain connectivity during rest , 2013, NeuroImage.

[6]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  Modulatory Interactions of Resting-State Brain Functional Connectivity , 2013, PloS one.

[7]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiology of the BOLD fMRI Signal in Awake Monkeys , 2008, Current Biology.

[8]  J. Duyn,et al.  Time-varying functional network information extracted from brief instances of spontaneous brain activity , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[10]  Xiao Liu,et al.  EEG correlates of time-varying BOLD functional connectivity , 2013, NeuroImage.

[11]  G. Orban,et al.  Default Mode of Brain Function in Monkeys , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Yong He,et al.  Characterizing dynamic functional connectivity in the resting brain using variable parameter regression and Kalman filtering approaches , 2011, NeuroImage.

[13]  Shella D. Keilholz,et al.  Dynamic Properties of Functional Connectivity in the Rodent , 2013, Brain Connect..

[14]  Hellmuth Obrig,et al.  Correlates of alpha rhythm in functional magnetic resonance imaging and near infrared spectroscopy , 2003, NeuroImage.

[15]  Natasha M. Maurits,et al.  Correlating the alpha rhythm to BOLD using simultaneous EEG/fMRI: Inter-subject variability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[16]  M. Corbetta,et al.  How Local Excitation–Inhibition Ratio Impacts the Whole Brain Dynamics , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  Christoforos Anagnostopoulos,et al.  Estimating time-varying brain connectivity networks from functional MRI time series , 2013, NeuroImage.

[19]  Theiler,et al.  Generating surrogate data for time series with several simultaneously measured variables. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[20]  Rodrigo Quian Quiroga,et al.  Nonlinear multivariate analysis of neurophysiological signals , 2005, Progress in Neurobiology.

[21]  David T. Jones,et al.  Nonstationarity in the ‘resting brain's’ modular architecture , 2012, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[22]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Evolutionarily Novel Functional Networks in the Human Brain? , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  David T. Jones,et al.  Non-Stationarity in the “Resting Brain’s” Modular Architecture , 2012, PloS one.

[24]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  On spurious and real fluctuations of dynamic functional connectivity during rest , 2015, NeuroImage.

[25]  R. Malach,et al.  Intersubject Synchronization of Cortical Activity During Natural Vision , 2004, Science.

[26]  T. Schreiber,et al.  Surrogate time series , 1999, chao-dyn/9909037.

[27]  Waqas Majeed,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of low frequency BOLD fluctuations in rats and humans , 2011, NeuroImage.

[28]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[29]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[30]  A. Destexhe,et al.  The high-conductance state of neocortical neurons in vivo , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Functional imaging of the monkey brain , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  Stephen D. Mayhew,et al.  Pharmacological FMRI: Measuring Opioid Effects on the BOLD Response to Hypercapnia , 2007, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[33]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Resting‐state networks show dynamic functional connectivity in awake humans and anesthetized macaques , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[34]  Martin A. Lindquist,et al.  Evaluating dynamic bivariate correlations in resting-state fMRI: A comparison study and a new approach , 2014, NeuroImage.

[35]  Martin A. Lindquist,et al.  Dynamic connectivity regression: Determining state-related changes in brain connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[36]  Leonardo L. Gollo,et al.  Time-resolved resting-state brain networks , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Resting-State Temporal Synchronization Networks Emerge from Connectivity Topology and Heterogeneity , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[38]  Karl J. Friston Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review , 2011, Brain Connect..

[39]  B. Biswal,et al.  Dynamic brain functional connectivity modulated by resting-state networks , 2013, Brain Structure and Function.

[40]  Alain Destexhe,et al.  Neuronal Computations with Stochastic Network States , 2006, Science.

[41]  Kent A. Kiehl,et al.  A method for evaluating dynamic functional network connectivity and task-modulation: application to schizophrenia , 2010, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[42]  Catie Chang,et al.  Time–frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[43]  Hillary D. Schwarb,et al.  Short‐time windows of correlation between large‐scale functional brain networks predict vigilance intraindividually and interindividually , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[44]  Daniel A. Handwerker,et al.  Periodic changes in fMRI connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[45]  Enzo Tagliazucchi,et al.  Dynamic BOLD functional connectivity in humans and its electrophysiological correlates , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[46]  M. Sigman,et al.  Signature of consciousness in the dynamics of resting-state brain activity , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.