Comparison of patient-reported visual outcome methods to quantify the perceptual effects of defocus.

[1]  M. Freyd,et al.  The Graphic Rating Scale. , 1923 .

[2]  P. Miles.  Depth of focus and amplitude of accommodation through trifocal glasses. , 1953, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  Campbell Fw.  A method for measuring the depth of field of the human eye. , 1954 .

[4]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[5]  J. Duthie.  Rheumatology and rehabilitation. , 1972, British medical journal.

[6]  E. Ohnhaus,et al.  Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: A comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale , 1975, PAIN.

[7]  E C Huskisson,et al.  Application of visual-analogue scales to the measurement of functional capacity. , 1976, Rheumatology and rehabilitation.

[8]  D. Harville.  Maximum Likelihood Approaches to Variance Component Estimation and to Related Problems , 1977 .

[9]  E C Huskisson,et al.  Vertical or horizontal visual analogue scales. , 1979, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[10]  Laurence A. Bradley,et al.  8 – Assessment of Chronic Pain , 1981 .

[11]  A. Carlsson.  Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale , 1983, Pain.

[12]  D. Price,et al.  The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain , 1983, Pain.

[13]  R. Seymour,et al.  An evaluation of length and end-phrase of visual analogue scales in dental pain , 1985, Pain.

[14]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[15]  G. Guyatt,et al.  A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[16]  S. Sheather,et al.  Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review , 1988, Psychological Medicine.

[17]  D. Bates,et al.  Newton-Raphson and EM Algorithms for Linear Mixed-Effects Models for Repeated-Measures Data , 1988 .

[18]  G Smith,et al.  Effect of Defocus on Blur Thresholds and on Thresholds of Perceived Change in Blur: Comparison of Source and Observer Methods , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[19]  G Smith,et al.  Effect of Defocus on Visual Acuity As Measured by Source and Observer Methods , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[20]  M. Guillon,et al.  Soft Contact Lens Visual Performance: A Multicenter Study , 1991, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[21]  Ian P. Davies,et al.  Correlation between visual acuity and visual quality in contact lens practice , 1992 .

[22]  K. Pesudovs,et al.  Decreased Uncorrected Vision After a Period of Distance Fixation with Spectacle Wear , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[23]  D. Whitaker,et al.  Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  M. Rosenfield,et al.  Repeatability of Subjective and Objective Refraction , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[25]  L. Malott,et al.  Ocular dominance testing , 1996 .

[26]  A Bradley,et al.  Effects of refractive error on detection acuity and resolution acuity in peripheral vision. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[27]  E. Papas,et al.  Repeatability and comparison of visual analogue and numerical rating scales in the assessment of visual quality , 1997, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[28]  S. Gandolfi,et al.  Self-assessment of the quality of vision: association of questionnaire score with objective clinical tests. , 1998, Current eye research.

[29]  R E Fusaro,et al.  The Repeatability of Automated and Clinician Refraction , 1998, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[30]  B. Ek,et al.  Comparison of present pain intensity assessments on horizontally and vertically oriented visual analogue scales. , 1998 .

[31]  James R Tresilian,et al.  Improving vision: neural compensation for optical defocus , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  J. McMurray,et al.  A comparison of the reproducibility and the sensitivity to change of visual analogue scales, Borg scales, and Likert scales in normal subjects during submaximal exercise. , 1999, Chest.

[33]  D A Atchison,et al.  The effect of under and over refractive correction on visual performance and spectacle lens acceptance , 2001, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[34]  Michael A. Webster,et al.  Neural adjustments to image blur , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  A. Bradley,et al.  Statistical variation of aberration structure and image quality in a normal population of healthy eyes. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[36]  S. Groshen,et al.  Comparison of conditional quality of life terminology and visual analogue scale measurements , 1996, Quality of Life Research.

[37]  M. Bullimore,et al.  Evaluation of an Automated Subjective Refractor , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[38]  Mark Rosenfield,et al.  Blur Adaptation in Myopes , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[39]  Comparaison des aberrations optiques oculaires d’ordre élevé induites par différentes géométries de lentilles multifocales , 2005 .

[40]  Andrea M. Wessell,et al.  Effect of terminal digit preference on blood pressure measurement and treatment in primary care. , 2006, American journal of hypertension.

[41]  S. Hayes.  Does terminal digit preference occur in pathology? , 2008, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[42]  Jason E Stahl,et al.  Association between ocular dominance and refraction. , 2008, Journal of refractive surgery.

[43]  Ping Situ,et al.  Utility of Short-Term Evaluation of Presbyopic Contact Lens Performance , 2009, Eye & contact lens.

[44]  Whitney L Scott,et al.  Subjective comparison of 2 daily disposable contact lenses: Focus Dailies with AquaRelease and Proclear 1-Day. , 2010, Optometry.

[45]  Dan Schonfeld,et al.  Virtual Focus and Depth Estimation From Defocused Video Sequences , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[46]  L. Jones,et al.  Comfort and Vision with Silicone Hydrogel Lenses: Effect of Compliance , 2010, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[47]  B. Holden,et al.  Interactions of Lens Care with Silicone Hydrogel Lenses and Effect on Comfort , 2010, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[48]  Cathy Frey,et al.  Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science , 2010 .