Functional neuromuscular stimulation controlled by surface electromyographic signals produced by volitional activation of the same muscle: adaptive removal of the muscle response from the recorded EMG-signal.

In order to use the volitional electromyography (EMG) as a control signal for the stimulation of the same muscle, it is necessary to eliminate the stimulation artifacts and the muscle responses caused by the stimulation. The stimulation artifacts, caused by the electric field in skin and tissue generated by the stimulation current, are relatively easy to eliminate by shutting down the EMG-amplifier at the onset of the stimulation pulses. The muscle response is a nonstationary signal, therefore, an adaptive linear prediction filter is proposed. The filter is implemented and for three filter lengths tested on both simulated and real data. The filter performance is compared with a conventional fixed comb filter. The simulations indicate that the adaptive filter is relatively insensitive to variations in amplitude of the muscle responses, and for all filter lengths produces a good filtering. For variations in shape of the muscle responses and for real data, an increased filter performance can be achieved by increasing the filter length. Using a filter length of up to seven stimulation periods, it is possible to reduce real muscle responses to a level comparable with the background noise. Using the shut-down circuit and the adaptive filter both the stimulation artifacts and the muscle responses can be effectively eliminated from the EMG signal from a stimulated muscle. It is therefore possible to extract the volitional EMG from a partly paralyzed muscle and use it for controlling the stimulation of the same muscle.

[1]  L. Vodovnik,et al.  Myo-electric control of paralyzed muscles. , 1965, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[2]  G. Hefftner,et al.  The electromyogram (EMG) as a control signal for functional neuromuscular stimulation. I. Autoregressive modeling as a means of EMG signature discrimination , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  R. D'ambrosia,et al.  The Myoelectric Signal of Electrically Stimulated Muscle During Recruitment: An Inherent Feedback Pareter for a Closed-Loop Control Scheme , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  K. Kilgore,et al.  Implantable functional neuromuscular stimulation in the tetraplegic hand. , 1989, The Journal of hand surgery.

[5]  G. Hefftner,et al.  The electromyogram (EMG) as a control signal for functional neuromuscular stimulation. II. Practical demonstration of the EMG signature discrimination system , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Robert W. Mann,et al.  Myoelectric Signal Processing: Optimal Estimation Applied to Electromyography - Part I: Derivation of the Optimal Myoprocessor , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  E. Marsolais,et al.  Restoration of key grip and release in the C6 tetraplegic patient through functional electrical stimulation. , 1980 .

[8]  C. D. De Luca Physiology and Mathematics of Myoelectric Signals , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  S. Haykin,et al.  Adaptive Filter Theory , 1986 .

[10]  S Saxena,et al.  An EMG-controlled grasping system for tetraplegics. , 1995, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  P. E. Crago,et al.  Instrumented assessment of FNS hand control during specific manipulation tasks , 1994 .

[12]  R. Merletti,et al.  Electrically evoked myoelectric signals. , 1992, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[13]  E. Marsolais,et al.  Restoration of key grip and release in the C6 tetraplegic patient through functional electrical stimulation. , 1980, The Journal of hand surgery.

[14]  N. Hoshimiya,et al.  A multichannel FES system for the restoration of motor functions in high spinal cord injury patients: a respiration-controlled system for multijoint upper extremity , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  Physiology and Mathematics of Myoelectric Signals , 1979 .

[16]  R R Betz,et al.  Challenges to clinical deployment of upper limb neuroprostheses. , 1996, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.