Hysteresis in response of nonlinear bistable interface to continuously varying acoustic loading.

In many experimental situations it is an equation of the forced relaxator and not of the forced oscillator that describes a variation in the acoustic field of the interface width (i.e. of a characteristic distance between the surfaces composing the interface). The developed theory predicts that some types of the nonlinear relaxators (depending on the structure of the nonlinear interaction force between the surfaces) exhibit hysteresis in their response to continuous acoustic loading of first increasing and then decreasing amplitude. Nonlinear (unharmonic) variation of the interface width starts at threshold amplitude of the incident sinusoidal acoustic wave, which is higher than threshold amplitude for returning to sinusoidal motion. This dynamic hysteresis (and accompanying it bistability) are possible, in particular, if the dependence of the effective interaction force on the interface width admits two quasi-equilibrium positions of the interface (bistable interface) or if the force itself is hysteretic (hysteretic interface). These theoretical predictions are relevant to some recent experimental observations on the interaction of powerful ultrasonic fields with cracks.

[1]  I. Solodov,et al.  Instability, chaos, and "memory" in acoustic-wave-crack interaction. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[2]  B. Bhushan Handbook of micro/nano tribology , 1995 .

[3]  A. N. Sharkovskiĭ,et al.  Difference Equations and Their Applications , 1993 .

[4]  Vitalyi Gusev,et al.  Thermoelastic mechanism for logarithmic slow dynamics and memory in elastic wave interactions with individual cracks. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[5]  T. Shankland,et al.  Slow dynamics in the nonlinear elastic response of Berea sandstone , 1996 .

[6]  G. Busse,et al.  CAN: an example of nonclassical acoustic nonlinearity in solids. , 2002, Ultrasonics.

[7]  S. Hirsekorn Nonlinear transfer of ultrasound by adhesive joints : a theoretical description , 2001 .

[8]  Grebogi,et al.  Grazing bifurcations in impact oscillators. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[9]  V. Yu. Zaitsev,et al.  Nonlinear Interaction of Acoustical Waves Due to Cracks and Its Possible Usage for Cracks Detection , 1995 .

[10]  Andrew G. Glen,et al.  APPL , 2001 .

[11]  K. Kendall,et al.  Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[12]  Doo Young Yang,et al.  Interfacial reaction between chemically vapor-deposited HfO2 thin films and a HF-cleaned Si substrate during film growth and postannealing , 2002 .

[13]  Hubert M. Pollock,et al.  Interpretation of force curves in force microscopy , 1993 .

[14]  Molenaar,et al.  Generic behaviour of grazing impact oscillators , 1996 .

[15]  Jean-Raymond Abrial,et al.  On B , 1998, B.

[16]  D. Thompson,et al.  Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation , 1982 .

[17]  J. Richardson,et al.  Harmonic generation at an unbonded interface—I. Planar interface between semi-infinite elastic media , 1979 .

[18]  Celso Grebogi,et al.  Universal behavior of impact oscillators near grazing incidence , 1995 .

[19]  P. Holmes,et al.  A periodically forced piecewise linear oscillator , 1983 .

[20]  Otto Buck,et al.  Acoustic harmonic generation due to fatigue damage in high‐strength aluminum , 1979 .

[21]  Pll Siinksen,et al.  Control , 1999 .

[22]  O. Buck,et al.  Acoustic harmonic generation at diffusion bonds , 1997 .

[23]  Arne Nordmark,et al.  Non-periodic motion caused by grazing incidence in an impact oscillator , 1991 .

[24]  Steven R. Bishop,et al.  Bifurcations in impact oscillations , 1994 .

[25]  W. L. Morris,et al.  Acoustic harmonic generation at unbonded interfaces and fatigue cracks , 1978 .

[26]  Steven R. Bishop,et al.  Prediction of period-1 impacts in a driven beam , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[27]  Oleg Kolosov,et al.  Nonlinear Detection of Ultrasonic Vibrations in an Atomic Force Microscope , 1993 .

[28]  I. Solodov,et al.  DC effects, sub-harmonics, stochasticity and "memory" for contact acoustic non-linearity. , 2002, Ultrasonics.

[29]  Burnham,et al.  Nanosubharmonics: The dynamics of small nonlinear contacts. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[30]  V. Zaitsev,et al.  Nonlinear Scattering of Acoustic Waves by Discontinuity-like Defects in Application to Crack Detection , 1996 .

[31]  D. O. Thompson,et al.  Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation , 1985 .

[32]  J. Gilman,et al.  Nanotechnology , 2001 .

[33]  Igor Yu. Solodov,et al.  Ultrasonics of non-linear contacts: propagation, reflection and NDE-applications , 1998 .

[34]  J. Achenbach,et al.  Higher harmonics in the far field due to dynamic crack‐face contacting , 1993 .

[35]  Oleg Kolosov,et al.  Analysis of Subsurface Imaging and Effect of Contact Elasticity in the Ultrasonic Force Microscope , 1994 .

[36]  F. Peterka,et al.  Transition to chaotic motion in mechanical systems with impacts , 1992 .

[37]  U. Landman,et al.  Nanotribology: friction, wear and lubrication at the atomic scale , 1995, Nature.

[38]  J. Barbera,et al.  Contact mechanics , 1999 .

[39]  Bernard Castagnède,et al.  Self-induced hysteresis for nonlinear acoustic waves in cracked material. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[40]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.