Exploring the relationship between doctoral students’ experiences and research community positioning

ABSTRACT Despite the growing number of studies exploring PhD students’ experiences and their social relationships with other researchers, there is a lack of research on the interaction between the type of experiences and the social agents involved, especially in relation to not only problems and challenges, but also to positive emotions and experiences. In this study, we addressed this gap exploring the relationship between four ecology doctoral students’ most significant experiences and their perceived position in the research community. Additionally, we aimed at exploring the utility of a methodological device with two instruments, Journey Plot and Community Plot. Results showed, in one hand, that both positive and negative experiences were significant in students’ trajectories, but the proportion varied greatly across participants. Supervisors were related to negative experiences, whereas the broader community was mostly source of positive experiences. Research writing and communication experiences were significant in relation to all the social agents, while other contents of experience were restricted to the smallest social layers (e.g. research motives were confined to the individual layer, and research organization to the individual and supervisor layers). Relationships between the type of experiences and participants’ position in the community were found and implications for doctoral education discussed.

[1]  Paul A Prior,et al.  Tracing Authoritative and Internally Persuasive Discourses: A Case Study of Response, Revision, and Disciplinary Enculturation. , 1995 .

[2]  Claire Aitchison,et al.  ‘Tough love and tears’: learning doctoral writing in the sciences , 2012 .

[3]  M. Hasrati,et al.  Legitimate peripheral participation and supervising Ph.D. students , 2005 .

[4]  Richard Winter,et al.  Contextualizing the Patchwork Text: addressing problems of coursework assessment in higher education , 2003 .

[5]  Y. R. Venturini,et al.  Phd , 2009, AINA.

[6]  J. Rodwell,et al.  The ‘invisible’ part‐time research students: a case study of satisfaction and completion , 2009 .

[7]  Barbara E. Lovitts,et al.  Being a good course‐taker is not enough: a theoretical perspective on the transition to independent research , 2005 .

[8]  Lorraine Brown,et al.  Coping with loneliness: A netnographic study of doctoral students , 2014 .

[9]  Robert E. Stake,et al.  Multiple Case Study Analysis , 2005 .

[10]  Paul A Prior,et al.  Voices in text, mind, and society , 2001 .

[11]  M. Martinsuo,et al.  Personal commitment, support and progress in doctoral studies , 2011 .

[12]  L. McAlpine,et al.  ‘Untold’ doctoral stories: can we move beyond cultural narratives of neglect? , 2012 .

[13]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[14]  Susan K. Gardner,et al.  On becoming a scholar : socialization and development in doctoral education , 2010 .

[15]  D. Boud,et al.  Changing Practices of Doctoral Education , 2008 .

[16]  Lynn McAlpine,et al.  Identity-Trajectory: Reframing Early Career Academic Experience. , 2014 .

[17]  G. Turner.  Learning to supervise: four journeys , 2015 .

[18]  Chris M. Golde.  Beginning Graduate School: Explaining First‐Year Doctoral Attrition , 1998 .

[19]  Susan K. Gardner,et al.  Conceptualizing Success in Doctoral Education: Perspectives of Faculty in Seven Disciplines , 2009 .

[20]  K. Lonka,et al.  Challenges of Becoming a Scholar: A Study of Doctoral Students' Problems and Well-Being , 2012 .

[21]  M. Castelló,et al.  Chapter 10: Texts as Artifacts-in-Activity: Developing Authorial Identity and Academic Voice in Writing Academic Research Papers , 2012 .

[22]  M. Castelló,et al.  Learning to Write a Research Article: Ph.D. Students' Transitions toward Disciplinary Writing Regulation. , 2013 .

[23]  E. Saalman,et al.  PhD. Supervision as an Emotional Process - Critical Situations and Emotional Boundary Work , 2014 .

[24]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[25]  Darla J. Twale,et al.  Socialization of Graduate and Professional Students in Higher Education, a Perilous Passage? , 2001 .

[26]  Ann E. Austin.  Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career , 2002 .

[27]  Paul Prior.  A Sociocultural Theory of Writing. , 2005 .

[28]  C. Beard,et al.  Positive emotions: passionate scholarship and student transformation , 2014 .

[29]  Susan K. Gardner,et al.  “What's too much and what's too little?”: The Process of Becoming an Independent Researcher in Doctoral Education , 2008 .

[30]  The response of pre-service teachers to a compulsory research project , 2008 .

[31]  L. McAlpine.  Doctoral supervision: Not an individual but a collective institutional responsibility , 2013 .

[32]  B. Golden.  The past is the past--or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. , 1992, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[33]  Rosemary Deem,et al.  Doctoral Students' Access to Research Cultures-are some more unequal than others? , 2000 .

[34]  Susan K. Gardner,et al.  Contrasting the Socialization Experiences of Doctoral Students in High- and Low-Completing Departments: A Qualitative Analysis of Disciplinary Contexts at One Institution , 2010 .

[35]  K. Ryan,et al.  Educational Accountability: A Qualitatively Driven Mixed-Methods Approach , 2011 .

[36]  L. McAlpine,et al.  Early career researcher challenges: substantive and methods-based insights , 2015 .

[37]  K. Pyhältö,et al.  Doctoral Students' Sense of Relational Agency in Their Scholarly Communities. , 2012 .

[38]  Bruce G. Barnett,et al.  Teaching Doctoral Students to Become Scholarly Writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques , 2000 .