How does the design community think about design?

Design is a term that brings many people together. Collectively, we distinguish ourselves from others by the fact that we are designers and members of a design community. But, design is also a term that pushes people apart. The design that some value in the new fashions in the boutiques in Milan is not seen by everyone as design. While some are impressed with the design of a new telephone, not everyone sees this as design. As a community, we believe design is important. But, as a community, we do not have a common definition of what it is. Many views of design have been proposed. Several classifications of design have been proposed. In this paper, we also seek to classify views on design. Unlike earlier efforts, however, we want to find the classification that the global community of designers uses. To this end, we examine the patterns of citations to key authors' works (Author Co-citation Analysis) to uncover this classification and identify seven key author clusters representing identifiable theory groups or schools of thought/practice in design.

[1]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Developments in design methodology , 1984 .

[2]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Core Journal Networks and Cocitation Maps: New Bibliometric Tools for Serials Research and Management , 1991, The Library Quarterly.

[3]  Christopher Alexander Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1964 .

[4]  Henry Small,et al.  Cited Documents as Concept Symbols , 1978 .

[5]  Clayton Lewis,et al.  Designing for usability—key principles and what designers think , 1983, CHI '83.

[6]  H. W. Rittel,et al.  Second-generation design methods , 1984 .

[7]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Literatures I: Identifying and Graphing Specialties , 1974 .

[8]  C. Benito Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) , 2003 .

[9]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  The case against user interface consistency , 1989, CACM.

[10]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[11]  J. Christopher Jones,et al.  Design methods: Seeds of human futures , 1970 .

[12]  W. H. Mayall,et al.  Principles in design , 1979 .

[13]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview , 1990, Journal of the American Society for Information Science.

[14]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[15]  Gordon Lindsay Glegg,et al.  The Design Of Design , 1969 .

[16]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2022 .

[17]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work , 1999 .

[18]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Work-oriented design of computer artifacts , 1989 .

[19]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[20]  Clive L. Dym,et al.  Engineering Design: A Synthesis of Views , 1994 .

[21]  H. Simon The Sciences of the Artificial, (Third edition) , 1997 .

[22]  D. Schoen Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[23]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[24]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial - 3rd Edition , 1981 .

[25]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Participatory design , 1993, CACM.

[26]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[27]  John Chris Jones,et al.  Design Methods: Seeds of Human Futures , 1981 .

[28]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[29]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Visualizing a Discipline: An Author Co-Citation Analysis of Information Science, 1972-1995 , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[30]  Keith Duncan,et al.  Cognitive Engineering , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[31]  Kuntz Werner,et al.  Issues as Elements of Information Systems , 1970 .

[32]  Jonathan Furner,et al.  Scholarly communication and bibliometrics , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  Linda Candy,et al.  Creative design of the Lotus bicycle: implications for knowledge support systems research , 1996 .

[34]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .