Performance and availability trade-offs in fault-tolerant middleware

Distributing functionality of an application is in common use. Systems that are built with this feature in mind also have to provide high levels of dependability. One way of assuring availability of services is to tolerate faults in the system, thereby avoiding failures. Building distributed applications is not an easy task. To provide fault tolerance is even harder. Using middlewares as mediators between hardware and operating systems on one hand and high-level applications on the other hand is a solution to the above difficult problems. It can help application writers by providing automatic generation of code supporting e.g. fault tolerance mechanisms, and by offering interoperability and language independence. For over twenty years, the research community is producing results in the area of . However, experimental studies of different platforms are performed mostly by using made-up simple applications. Also, especially in case of CORBA, there is no fault-tolerant middleware totally conforming to the standard, and well studied in terms of trade-offs. This thesis presents a fault-tolerant CORBA middleware built and evaluated using a realistic application running on top of it. Also, it contains results obtained after experiments with an alternative infrastructure implementing a robust fault-tolerant algorithm using basic CORBA. In the first infrastructure a problem is the existence of single points of failure. On the other hand, overheads and recovery times fall in acceptable ranges. When using the robust algorithm, the problem of single points of failure disappears. The problem here is the memory usage, and overhead values as well as recovery times that can become quite long.