A formal framework for connective stability of highly decentralized cooperative negotiations

Multiagent cooperative negotiation is a promising technique for modeling and controlling complex systems. Effective and flexible cooperative negotiations are especially useful for open complex systems characterized by high decentralization (which implies a low amount of exchanged information) and by dynamic connection and disconnection of agents. Applications include ad hoc network management, vehicle formation, and physiological model combination. To obtain an effective control action, the stability of the negotiation, namely the guarantee that an agreement will be eventually reached, is of paramount importance. However, the techniques usually employed for assessing the stability of a negotiation can be hardly applied in open scenarios. In this paper, whose nature is mainly theoretical, we make a first attempt towards engineering stable cooperative negotiations proposing a framework for their analysis and design. Specifically, we present a formal protocol for cooperative negotiations between a number of agents and we propose a criterion for negotiation stability based on the concept of connective stability. This is a form of stability that accounts for the effects of structural changes on the composition of a system and that appears very suitable for multiagent cooperative negotiations. To show its possible uses, we apply our framework for connective stability to some negotiations taken from literature.

[1]  M. Shubik,et al.  Dynamics of money. , 1998, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[2]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[3]  Francesco Amigoni,et al.  Anthropic agency: a multiagent system for physiological processes , 2003, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[4]  Pirja Heiskanen,et al.  Decentralized method for computing Pareto solutions in multiparty negotiations , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Karl Johan Åström,et al.  Control of complex systems , 2001 .

[6]  Francesco Amigoni,et al.  An approximate Pareto optimal cooperative negotiation model for multiple continuous dependent issues , 2005, IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology.

[7]  John Bigham,et al.  Cooperative negotiation in a multi-agent system for real-time load balancing of a mobile cellular network , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[8]  NICHOLAS R. JENNINGS,et al.  An agent-based approach for building complex software systems , 2001, CACM.

[9]  Nicola Gatti,et al.  A Connective Stability Analysis of Complex System Simulation and Control via Multiagent Systems , 2004 .

[10]  C. Tomlin,et al.  Decentralized optimization, with application to multiple aircraft coordination , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2002..

[11]  Paul A. Fishwick,et al.  An integrated approach to system modeling using a synthesis of artificial intelligence, software engineering and simulation methodologies , 1992, TOMC.

[12]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Game Theory and Decision Theory in Multi-Agent Systems , 2002, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[13]  A. Rubinstein Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model , 1982 .

[14]  Holger Voos Market-based algorithms for optimal decentralized control of complex dynamic systems , 1999, Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.99CH36304).

[15]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  A multimodel methodology for qualitative model engineering , 1992, TOMC.

[16]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents , 1998, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[17]  Francesco Amigoni,et al.  A cooperative negotiation protocol for physiological model combination , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[18]  L. Grujic Large Scale Systems Stability under Structural and Singular Perturbations , 1987 .

[19]  Dragoslav D. Siljak,et al.  Stability of Large-Scale Systems under Structural Perturbations , 1972, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[20]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Strategic Negotiation in Multiagent Environments , 2001, Intelligent robots and autonomous agents.

[21]  David A. Meyer,et al.  Towards the global: complexity, topology and chaos in modelling, simulation and computation , 1997, chao-dyn/9710005.

[22]  R. Palm,et al.  Synchronization of decentralized multiple-model systems by market-based optimization , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[23]  A. Rubinstein,et al.  The Nash bargaining solution in economic modelling , 1985 .

[24]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  Cooperative negotiation for soft real-time distributed resource allocation , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[25]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Optimal negotiation of multiple issues in incomplete information settings , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[26]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Fuzzy multimodels , 1996, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[27]  Francesco Amigoni,et al.  A decentralized bargaining protocol on dependent continuous multi-issue for approximate pareto optimal outcomes , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[28]  S. Zionts,et al.  Generating Pareto Solutions in a Two-Party Setting: Constraint Proposal Methods , 1999 .

[29]  T. Ferguson Game Theory and Decision Theory , 1967 .

[30]  E. Kalai,et al.  OTHER SOLUTIONS TO NASH'S BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1975 .

[31]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  Adopt: asynchronous distributed constraint optimization with quality guarantees , 2005, Artif. Intell..

[32]  Francesco Amigoni,et al.  Combining rate-adaptive cardiac pacing algorithms via multiagent negotiation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[33]  Gerhard Weiss,et al.  Multiagent systems: a modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence , 1999 .

[34]  P. Antsaklis INTELLIGENT CONTROL , 1994 .

[35]  John A. Weymark,et al.  Welfarism on economic domains , 1998 .

[36]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  Multistage negotiation for distributed constraint satisfaction , 1991, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[37]  J. Nash THE BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1950, Classics in Game Theory.

[38]  Lothar Litz,et al.  Market-based optimal control: a general introduction , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.00CH36334).

[39]  S. Clearwater Market-based control: a paradigm for distributed resource allocation , 1996 .

[40]  Vikram Srinivasan,et al.  Cooperation in wireless ad hoc networks , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[41]  Harri Ehtamo,et al.  Searching for joint gains in multi-party negotiations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..