Destruction of Contrast Microbubbles by Ultrasound: Effects on Myocardial Function, Coronary Perfusion Pressure, and Microvascular Integrity

Background— Recent experimental data indicate that ultrasound-induced destruction of ultrasound contrast microbubbles can cause immediate rupture of the microvessels in which these microbubbles are located. Methods and Results— To examine the functional and morphological significance of these findings in the heart, isolated rabbit hearts were perfused retrogradely with buffer containing ultrasound contrast agents and were insonated at increasing levels of acoustic energy with a broadband transducer emitting at 1.8 MHz and receiving at 3.6 MHz and operated in the triggered mode (1 Hz). At the end of each experiment, the hearts were fixed in glutaraldehyde and examined with light microscopy. Neither exposure to ultrasound alone or to contrast alone affected left ventricular developed pressure. By contrast, simultaneous exposure to contrast and ultrasound resulted in a reversible, transient mechanical index (MI)-dependent decrease in left ventricular developed pressure (to 83±5% of baseline at an MI of 1.6) and a transient MI-dependent increase in coronary perfusion pressure (to 120±6% of baseline at an MI of 1.6). Myocardial lactate release also showed significant increases with increasing MIs. Macroscopically, areas of intramural hemorrhage were identified over the beam elevation in hearts exposed to both contrast and high-MI ultrasound. Light microscopy revealed the presence of capillary ruptures, erythrocyte extravasation, and endothelial cell damage. The mean percentage of capillaries ruptured at an MI of 1.6 was 3.6±1.4%. Conclusions— Simultaneous exposure of isolated rabbit hearts to ultrasound and contrast agents results in an MI-dependent, transient depression of left ventricular contractile function, a rise in coronary perfusion pressure, an increase in lactate production, and limited capillary ruptures.

[1]  D. Brutsaert,et al.  Alteration of Left Ventricular Endocardial Function by Intracavitary High‐Power Ultrasound Interacts With Volume, Inotropic State, and &agr;1‐Adrenergic Stimulation , 1993, Circulation.

[2]  V. Mornstein Cavitation-induced risks associated with contrast agents used in ultrasonography , 1997 .

[3]  R E Apfel,et al.  Direct evidence of cavitation in vivo from diagnostic ultrasound. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  P A van Der Wouw,et al.  Premature ventricular contractions during triggered imaging with ultrasound contrast. , 2000, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[5]  R E Apfel,et al.  Thresholds for transient cavitation produced by pulsed ultrasound in a controlled nuclei environment. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  P. Grayburn,et al.  Safety and efficacy of QW7437, a new fluorocarbon-based echocardiographic contrast agent. , 1997, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[7]  T C Skalak,et al.  Delivery of colloidal particles and red blood cells to tissue through microvessel ruptures created by targeted microbubble destruction with ultrasound. , 1998, Circulation.

[8]  S. Kaul,et al.  Interactions between microbubbles and ultrasound: in vitro and in vivo observations. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  R. M. Thomas,et al.  Frequency dependence of cavitation activity in a rotating tube exposure system compared to the mechanical index. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  E. Carstensen,et al.  Lysis of erythrocytes by exposure to CW ultrasound. , 1993, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  J. Rouleau,et al.  Effect of dysfunctional vascular endothelium on myocardial performance in isolated papillary muscles. , 1993, Circulation research.

[12]  O. Kamp,et al.  NC100100, a new echo contrast agent for the assessment of myocardial perfusion—safety and comparison with technetium‐99m sestamibi single‐photon emission computed tomography in a randomized multicenter study , 1999, Clinical cardiology.

[13]  T C Skalak,et al.  Direct In Vivo Visualization of Intravascular Destruction of Microbubbles by Ultrasound and Its Local Effects on Tissue. , 1998, Circulation.

[14]  M. Janier,et al.  The relative importance of myocardial energy metabolism compared with ischemic contracture in the determination of ischemic injury in isolated perfused rabbit hearts. , 1994, Circulation research.

[15]  R V Shohet,et al.  Echocardiographic destruction of albumin microbubbles directs gene delivery to the myocardium. , 2000, Circulation.

[16]  P. Dayton,et al.  Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[17]  S. Barnett,et al.  Ultrasound. Nonthermal issues: cavitation--its nature, detection and measurement. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  A. Sharkey,et al.  Cardiac endothelial cells modulate contractility of rat heart in response to oxygen tension and coronary flow. , 1993, Circulation research.

[19]  E. Carstensen,et al.  Age dependence of ultrasonically induced lung hemorrhage in mice. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  O. Kamp,et al.  Accuracy and feasibility of contrast echocardiography for detection of perfusion defects in routine practice: comparison with wall motion and technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. The Nycomed NC100100 Investigators. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  S. Kaul,et al.  Albunex: a safe and effective commercially produced agent for myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 1989, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[22]  T. Porter,et al.  Visually discernible myocardial echocardiographic contrast after intravenous injection of sonicated dextrose albumin microbubbles containing high molecular weight, less soluble gases. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  D. Brutsaert,et al.  Intracavitary ultrasound impairs left ventricular performance: presumed role of endocardial endothelium. , 1992, The American journal of physiology.