Trump’s and Clinton’s Style and Rhetoric during the 2016 Presidential Election

Abstract The present paper examines the style and rhetoric of the two main candidates (Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump) during the 2016 presidential election. Based on interviews and TV debates, the most frequent lemmas indicate an emphasis on the pronoun I for both candidates while in speeches, the pronoun we appears more frequently. According to overall stylistic indicators, Trump adopts a simple and direct communication style, preferring short sentences, avoiding complex formulations and employing a reduced vocabulary. In the oral form, Trump frequently uses verb phrases (verbs and adverbs) and pronouns while Clinton is more descriptive (more nouns and prepositions). As expected, the speeches present differences from the oral form. For Trump, the difference is clearly larger, distinctively depicting two communication styles (oral and written). The specific terms or sentences associated with each candidate reveal their characteristic topics and style, such as the repetition of expressions and negativity for Trump. Based on predefined word lists, this study indicates that Clinton’s rhetoric employs more cognitive words, while negative emotions and exclusive terms occur more frequently in Trump’s verbiage.

[1]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Register, Genre, and Style , 2019 .

[2]  Mary E. Stuckey.  Political Tone: How Leaders Talk and Why , 2015 .

[3]  Matthew Purver,et al.  Twitter Language Use Reflects Psychological Differences between Democrats and Republicans , 2015, PloS one.

[4]  Dominique Labbé,et al.  Vote for me. Don’t vote for the other one , 2015 .

[5]  David Mitchell,et al.  Type-token models: a comparative study , 2015, J. Quant. Linguistics.

[6]  Bei Yu,et al.  Language and gender in Congressional speech , 2014, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[7]  John Nerbonne,et al.  The Secret Life of Pronouns. What Our Words Say About Us , 2014, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[8]  Justin Grimmer,et al.  Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts , 2013, Political Analysis.

[9]  D. Labbé,et al.  La campagne présidentielle de 2012. Votez pour moi , 2013 .

[10]  G. Lakoff,et al.  The Little Blue Book: The Essential Guide to Thinking and Talking Democratic , 2012 .

[11]  Stuart Soroka,et al.  Affective News: The Automated Coding of Sentiment in Political Texts , 2012 .

[12]  Michelle C. Bligh,et al.  Finding Her Voice: Hillary Clinton's Rhetoric in the 2008 Presidential Campaign , 2010 .

[13]  Brendan T. O'Connor,et al.  From Tweets to Polls: Linking Text Sentiment to Public Opinion Time Series , 2010, ICWSM.

[14]  Michael A. Covington,et al.  Cutting the Gordian Knot: The Moving-Average Type–Token Ratio (MATTR) , 2010, J. Quant. Linguistics.

[15]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods , 2010 .

[16]  Ioan-Iovitz Popescu,et al.  Word Frequency Studies , 2009 .

[17]  Stefan Kaufmann,et al.  Classifying Party Affiliation from Political Speech , 2008 .

[18]  Denis Monière,et al.  Je est-il un autre ? , 2008 .

[19]  Barbara R. Holland,et al.  Analysis of Phylogenetics and Evolution with R , 2007 .

[20]  Dominique Labbé,et al.  Experiments on authorship attribution by intertextual distance in english* , 2007, J. Quant. Linguistics.

[21]  Cindy K. Chung,et al.  Winning words: Individual differences in linguistic style among U.S. presidential and vice presidential candidates , 2007 .

[22]  Claire Cardie,et al.  OpinionFinder: A System for Subjectivity Analysis , 2005, HLT.

[23]  Dan Klein,et al.  Feature-Rich Part-of-Speech Tagging with a Cyclic Dependency Network , 2003, NAACL.

[24]  M. Laver,et al.  Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[25]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The Secret Life of Pronouns , 2003, Psychological science.

[26]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English , 2002 .

[27]  P. Stone,et al.  Verbal Style and the Presidency: A Computer-Based Analysis. , 1985 .

[28]  R. Burchfield.  Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[29]  Miroslav Kubát,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of US Presidential Inaugural Addresses , 2016, Glottometrics.

[30]  J. Tulis,et al.  THE RISE OF THE RHETORICAL PRESIDENCY , 2016 .

[31]  Jacques Savoy,et al.  Clustering : An Application with the State of the Union Addresses , 2015 .

[32]  Pierre Martin.  La campagne présidentielle de 2012 , 2014 .

[33]  B. Harward,et al.  Presidential Campaigns , 2013 .

[34]  D. Labbé,et al.  Les mots qui nous gouvernent: le discours des premiers ministres québécois : 1960-2005 , 2011 .

[35]  Austin F. Frank,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2010 .

[36]  Arjuna Tuzzi,et al.  The End of Year Addresses of the Presidents of the Italian Republic (1948-2006): discoursal similarities and differences , 2009, Glottometrics.

[37]  R. Baayen.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R, 1st Edition , 2008 .

[38]  D. Labbé,et al.  Le discours gouvernemental. Canada, Québec, France (1945-2000) , 2003 .

[39]  C. Muller.  Principes et méthodes de statistique lexicale , 1992 .

[40]  Paul F. Boller.  Presidential Campaigns: From George Washington to George W. Bush , 1984 .