Diagnostic Efficacy of Ultrasonography, Doppler Ultrasonography and Elastography in the Evaluation of Suspected Malignant Lymph Nodes

Abstract Aim In this prospective study, the efficiency of imaging findings was investigated by comparing the histopathological results of lymph nodes with Doppler and ultrasound features and elasticity scores. Material and method A total of 100 cervical or axillary lymph nodes with a suspected malignancy or whose size did not decrease after treatment were examined. In addition to the demographic data of the patients, B-mode ultrasound, Doppler ultrasound, and elastography features of the lymph nodes were evaluated prospectively. The irregular shape, increased size, pronounced hypoechogenicity, presence of micro/macro calcification, short axis/long axis ratio >2, increased size of the short axis, increased cortex thickness, obliterated hilus or increased cortex thickness >3.5 mm were evaluated on ultrasound. Resistivity index, pulsatility index, acceleration rate and time were evaluated for intranodal arterial structures on color. Doppler ultrasound, strain ratio value and elasticity score were recorded on ultrasound elastography. After sonographic examination, patients underwent ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology or tru-cutting needle biopsy. Histopathological examination results of the patients were compared with the B-mode ultrasound, Doppler ultrasound, and ultrasound elastography. Results When the individual and combined effects of the ultrasound, Doppler ultrasound, and ultrasound elastography were evaluated, the combination of all three imaging methods was found to have the highest sensitivity and the highest overall accuracy (90.4% and 73.9%). As an individual method Doppler ultrasound had the highest specificity (77.8%). B-mode ultrasound was found to have the lowest accuracy (56.7%) both in individual and combined evaluations. Conclusion Addition of ultrasound elastography to the combination of B-mode and Doppler ultrasound findings increases diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy in the differentiation of benign and malignant lymph nodes.

[1]  M. Golatta,et al.  Shear wave elastography as a supplemental tool in the assessment of unsuspicious axillary lymph nodes in patients undergoing breast ultrasound examination , 2022, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  M. Öncü,et al.  Investigation of the Effectiveness of Microvascular Doppler Ultrasound and Q-Pack in the Discrimination of Malign Thyroid Nodules From Benign , 2022, Ultrasound quarterly.

[3]  N. Aksoy,et al.  Importance of Superb Microvascular Imaging in Differentiation of Malignant Breast Lesions From Benign Lesions , 2021, European Journal of Breast Health.

[4]  Wei Lin Ng,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Shear Wave Elastography as an Adjunct Tool in Detecting Axillary Lymph Nodes Metastasis. , 2021, Academic radiology.

[5]  Hui-min Huang,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Quantitative and Qualitative Elastography for Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2020, Frontiers in Oncology.

[6]  Ji-hoon Kim,et al.  The Value of Microvascular Imaging for Triaging Indeterminate Cervical Lymph Nodes in Patients with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma , 2020, Cancers.

[7]  E. A. Abdelgawad,et al.  B-mode ultrasound, color Doppler, and sonoelastography in differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes with special emphasis on sonoelastography , 2020, Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Fengxia Yu,et al.  Ultrasound Surveillance of Abnormal Cervical Lymph Nodes in Patients With Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma After Surgery , 2020, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[9]  B. Luo,et al.  Diagnostic value of ultrasound elastography for differentiation of benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes: a meta-analysis. , 2020, Clinical radiology.

[10]  Qiaoling Zhao,et al.  Elastosonography and two-dimensional ultrasonography in diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer. , 2017, Clinical radiology.

[11]  S. Bhatt,et al.  Chapter 5 Ultrasound Characteristics of Benign vs Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes. , 2017, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[12]  S. Oktar,et al.  Value of Ultrasound Elastography in the Differential Diagnosis of Cervical Lymph Nodes , 2016, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[13]  Ying Huang,et al.  Prognostic Value of Cervical Nodal Necrosis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Analysis of 1800 Patients with Positive Cervical Nodal Metastasis at MR Imaging. , 2015, Radiology.

[14]  P. Slanetz,et al.  A practical approach to imaging the axilla , 2014, Insights into Imaging.

[15]  S. Bolboacă,et al.  The value of a new score for sonoelastographic differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes. , 2012, Medical ultrasonography.

[16]  Masaki Furukawa,et al.  Diagnosis of lymph node metastases of head and neck cancer and evaluation of effects of chemoradiotherapy using ultrasonography , 2010, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  Katsuhide Ito,et al.  Accuracy of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes: comparison with conventional B-mode sonography. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Tatsuya Higashi,et al.  Cervical lymph node metastases: diagnosis at sonoelastography--initial experience. , 2007, Radiology.

[19]  A. Ahuja,et al.  Power Doppler sonography of normal cervical lymph nodes. , 2000, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.