Empowerment or Imposition? Dilemmas of Local Ownership in Post-Conflict Peacebuilding Processes

This article examines questions of local ownership in post-conflict peacebuilding and makes the case that the complex relationship between insiders and outsiders lies at the very heart of contemporary peacebuilding processes. While the discourse of local ownership has increasingly become part of the vocabulary of post-conflict peacebuilding, the discussion to date on both the meanings and the practices of local ownership in peacebuilding contexts remains underdeveloped. This article is therefore an effort to add substance to the local ownership debate, and outlines two forms of peacebuilding—liberal and communitarian—which contain markedly different assumptions concerning the role of local actors in peacebuilding processes. Ultimately, the article suggests that the search for ways to operationalize local ownership principles remains one of the key challenges of contemporary peacebuilding, and outlines a vision of peacebuilding as cultural exchange as a way forward.

[1]  D. Moore Levelling the playing fields & embedding illusions: ‘post‐conflict’ discourse & neo‐liberal ‘development’ in war‐torn Africa , 2000 .

[2]  Paul Jackson,et al.  Warlords as alternative forms of Governance , 2003 .

[3]  Mark Baskin Between Exit and Engagement: on the Division of Authority in Transitional Administrations , 2004 .

[4]  L. Nathan,et al.  No ownership, no commitment: a guide to local ownership of Security Sector reform , 2007 .

[5]  Anna Grzymala-Busse Beyond Clientelism , 2008 .

[6]  Timothy Donais Local ownership and security sector reform , 2008 .

[7]  Camilla Orjuela Building Peace in Sri Lanka: a Role for Civil Society? , 2003 .

[8]  Charles T. Call,et al.  On Democratization and Peacebuilding , 2003 .

[9]  Oliver P. Richmond Emancipatory Forms of Human Security and Liberal Peacebuilding , 2007 .

[10]  C. King,et al.  Ending Civil Wars , 1997 .

[11]  Anne S Achieng Lederach, John Paul Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies . Washington: The United States Institute of Peace, 1997. , 2011 .

[12]  Mats Berdal,et al.  Greed and Grievance: Economic Agendas in Civil Wars (Introduction) , 2000 .

[13]  K. Bush Beyond Bungee Cord Humanitarianism: Towards a Developmental Agenda for Peacebuilding , 1996 .

[14]  D. Keen A rational kind of madness , 1997 .

[15]  V. Pupavac,et al.  Framing Post-conflict Societies: international pathologisation of Cambodia and the post-Yugoslav states , 2005 .

[16]  T. Duffey Cultural issues in contemporary peacekeeping , 2000 .

[17]  Stephen R. Gill Globalisation, Market Civilisation, and Disciplinary Neoliberalism , 1995 .

[18]  K. Marten Warlordism in Comparative Perspective , 2007, International Security.

[19]  C. Kumar,et al.  Peacebuilding as politics : cultivating peace in fragile societies , 2001 .

[20]  J. Pearce The International Community and Peacebuilding , 2005 .

[21]  W. Mott Cousens, Elizabeth M., Chetan Kumar, with Karin Wermester, eds. Peacebuilding as Politics: Cultivating Peace In Fragile Societies. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2001. , 2002 .

[22]  Gerald Knaus,et al.  Lessons from Bosnia and Herzegovina: Travails of the European Raj , 2003 .

[23]  A. Talentino Perceptions of Peacebuilding: The Dynamic of Imposer and Imposed Upon , 2007 .

[24]  R. Paris International peacebuilding and the ‘mission civilisatrice’ , 2002, Review of International Studies.

[25]  R. Paris Peacebuilding and the Limits of Liberal Internationalism , 1997, International Security.

[26]  Reyko Huang,et al.  The Nuts and Bolts of Post-Conflict Capacity Building: Practicable Lessons from East Timor , 2006 .

[27]  Keith Krause,et al.  Peace, Security and Development in Post-Conflict Environments , 2005 .

[28]  S. Chesterman Ownership in Theory and in Practice: Transfer of Authority in UN Statebuilding Operations , 2007 .