MACONT: Mixed Aggregation by Comprehensive Normalization Technique for Multi-Criteria Analysis

Normalization and aggregation are two most important issues in multi-criteria analysis. Although various multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods have been developed over the past several decades, few of them integrate multiple normalization techniques and mixed aggregation approaches at the same time to reduce the deviations of evaluation values and enhance the reliability of the final decision result. This study is dedicated to introducing a new MCDM method called Mixed Aggregation by COmprehensive Normalization Technique (MACONT) to tackle complicate MCDM problems. This method introduces a comprehensive normalization technique based on criterion types, and then uses two mixed aggregation operators to aggregate the distance values between each alternative and the reference alternative on different criteria from the perspectives of compensation and non-compensation. An illustrative example is given to show the applicability of the proposed method, and the advantages of the proposed method are highlighted through sensitivity analyses and comparative analyses.

[1]  Fabio Blanco-Mesa,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of aggregation operators , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[2]  G. Mavrotas,et al.  Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method , 1995, Comput. Oper. Res..

[3]  Huchang Liao,et al.  A consensus-based probabilistic linguistic gained and lost dominance score method , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Yi Peng,et al.  Evaluation of Classification Algorithms Using MCDM and Rank Correlation , 2012, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[5]  B. Roy THE OUTRANKING APPROACH AND THE FOUNDATIONS OF ELECTRE METHODS , 1991 .

[6]  Huchang Liao,et al.  DNMA: A double normalization-based multiple aggregation method for multi-expert multi-criteria decision making , 2020, Omega.

[7]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems , 2019, Management Decision.

[8]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[9]  Ali Jahan,et al.  A state-of-the-art survey on the influence of normalization techniques in ranking: Improving the materials selection process in engineering design , 2015 .

[10]  Huchang Liao,et al.  INTEGRATING BWM AND ARAS UNDER HESITANT LINGUISTIC ENVIRONMENT FOR DIGITAL SUPPLY CHAIN FINANCE SUPPLIER SECTION , 2019, Technological and Economic Development of Economy.

[11]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  On preference elicitation processes which mitigate the accumulation of biases in multi-criteria decision analysis , 2020, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment , 2012 .

[13]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  A novel hybrid multiple attribute decision-making approach for outsourcing sustainable reverse logistics , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[14]  Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al.  A career choice problem: An example of how to use MACBETH to build a quantitative value model based on qualitative value judgments , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Integrating and extending data and decision tools for sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider selection , 2019, Comput. Oper. Res..

[16]  Dragan Pamucar,et al.  The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Set and Its Application in Decision Making: A State-of-the-Art Survey , 2017, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.

[19]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  New KEMIRA Method for Determining Criteria Priority and Weights in Solving MCDM Problem , 2014, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[20]  Manish Aggarwal,et al.  Discriminative aggregation operators for multi criteria decision making , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[21]  Karel Skokan Technological and Economic Development of Economy , 2011 .

[22]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Project management by multimoora as an instrument for transition economies , 2010 .

[23]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach , 2007 .

[24]  Luís Alberto Duncan Rangel,et al.  An application of the TODIM method to the multicriteria rental evaluation of residential properties , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multimoora Optimization Used to Decide on a Bank Loan to Buy Property , 2011 .

[26]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods , 2014 .

[27]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  A survey of decision-making methods with probabilistic linguistic information: bibliometrics, preliminaries, methodologies, applications and future directions , 2020, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[28]  Alireza Alinezhad,et al.  New Methods and Applications in Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM) , 2019, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science.

[29]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Robustness of the multi‐objective MOORA method with a test for the facilities sector , 2009 .

[32]  Ikuobase Emovon,et al.  Methodology of Using an Integrated Averaging Technique and MAUT Method for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis , 2016 .

[33]  Hadi Ghaderi,et al.  Sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider evaluation and selection using fuzzy SWARA and developed fuzzy COPRAS in the presence of risk criteria , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[34]  Gang Kou,et al.  Evaluation of feature selection methods for text classification with small datasets using multiple criteria decision-making methods , 2020, Appl. Soft Comput..

[35]  S. Zolfani,et al.  Investment prioritizing in high tech industries based on SWARA-COPRAS approach , 2014 .

[36]  Huchang Liao,et al.  Probabilistic linguistic information fusion: A survey on aggregation operators in terms of principles, definitions, classifications, applications, and challenges , 2020, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[37]  Pengyu Chen,et al.  Effects of normalization on the entropy-based TOPSIS method , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..

[38]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) , 2015, Informatica.

[39]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[40]  Yi Peng,et al.  Soft consensus cost models for group decision making and economic interpretations , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[41]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making , 2010 .

[42]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Selection of a sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider based on the robustness analysis of an outranking graph kernel conducted with ELECTRE I and SMAA , 2019, Omega.