How do those affected by a disaster organize to meet their needs for justice? Campaign strategies and partial victories following the Grenfell Tower fire

Previous research has shown that disasters often involve a sense of injustice among affected communities. But the process through which ‘disaster communities’ organise to confront such injustices have not been investigated by social psychology. This study addresses this gap by examining how community members impacted by the Grenfell Tower fire self-organized to demand justice in response to government neglect. Thematic analysis of interviews with fifteen campaigners helped us to understand the shared responses of those involved in support campaigns following the fire. Campaigners aimed to: overcome injustice against the government inactions in the aftermath of the fire; empower their community against government neglect; create a sense of community for people who experienced injustice. Community members created a petition calling on the government to build trust in the public inquiry; they achieved their goals with the participation of people from wider communities. We found that reaching out to allies and building shared social identity among supporters were two main ways to achieve campaign goals. The study suggests ways that ‘disaster communities’ can be sustained after the disaster to form the basis of effective collective action. Specifically, shared social identity is a key mechanism for communities who are affected by a disaster, enabling them to act as one when they seek justice as well as overcome the effects of disaster.

[1]  J. Drury,et al.  Silent Walk as a street mobilization: Campaigning following the Grenfell Tower fire , 2020, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology.

[2]  J. Drury,et al.  Crowds and Collective Behavior , 2020 .

[3]  J. Drury,et al.  Collectively coping with coronavirus: Local community identification predicts giving support and lockdown adherence during the COVID‐19 pandemic , 2020, The British journal of social psychology.

[4]  Clifford Stevenson,et al.  A social cure in the community: A mixed‐method exploration of the role of social identity in the experiences and well‐being of community volunteers , 2020 .

[5]  K. Kaniasty Social support, interpersonal, and community dynamics following disasters caused by natural hazards. , 2020, Current opinion in psychology.

[6]  S. Vardoulakis,et al.  Bushfire smoke: urgent need for a national health protection strategy , 2020, The Medical journal of Australia.

[7]  M. Charles ComeUnity and Community in the Face of Impunity , 2019, After Grenfell.

[8]  Jenny Edkins,et al.  After Grenfell: Violence, Resistance and Response , 2019 .

[9]  Emma F. Thomas,et al.  Emerging research on intergroup prosociality: Group members' charitable giving, positive contact, allyship, and solidarity with others , 2019, Social and Personality Psychology Compass.

[10]  Liora Sarfati Morality and Legitimacy in the Sewŏl Protest in South Korea , 2018, Legitimacy.

[11]  J. Drury The role of social identity processes in mass emergency behaviour: An integrative review , 2018 .

[12]  O. Muldoon,et al.  Community identity and collective efficacy: A social cure for traumatic stress in post‐earthquake Nepal , 2017 .

[13]  C. Wannous,et al.  United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR)—UNISDR’s Contribution to Science and Technology for Disaster Risk Reduction and the Role of the International Consortium on Landslides (ICL)Open image in new window , 2017 .

[14]  M. Cronin Loss, Protest, and Heritage: Liverpool FC and Hillsborough , 2017, Sport and Protest.

[15]  A. Omoto,et al.  The power of connections: Psychological sense of community as a predictor of volunteerism , 2016, The Journal of social psychology.

[16]  Roberto González,et al.  Emergent social identity and observing social support predict social support provided by survivors in a disaster: solidarity in the 2010 Chile earthquake , 2016 .

[17]  J. Drury,et al.  Managing to avert disaster: Explaining collective resilience at an outdoor music event , 2015 .

[18]  A. Hajek Learning from L'Aquila: grassroots mobilization in post-earthquake Emilia-Romagna , 2013 .

[19]  Daniel P. Aldrich,et al.  Rethinking Civil Society–State Relations in Japan after the Fukushima Accident , 2013, Polity.

[20]  Kay Kitazawa,et al.  Fukushima in review: A complex disaster, a disastrous response , 2012 .

[21]  Cristina Flesher Fominaya,et al.  The Madrid bombings and popular protest: misinformation, counter-information, mobilisation and elections after ‘11-M’ , 2011 .

[22]  Vincanne Adams,et al.  Aging Disaster: Mortality, Vulnerability, and Long-Term Recovery among Katrina Survivors , 2011, Medical anthropology.

[23]  Tim Hopthrow,et al.  Donating to disaster victims: Responses to natural and humanly caused events , 2011 .

[24]  Stephen Bernardini,et al.  A paradise built in hell: the extraordinary communities that arise in disaster , 2011 .

[25]  Rachel E. Luft Beyond Disaster Exceptionalism: Social Movement Developments in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina , 2009, American Quarterly.

[26]  John Drury,et al.  Everyone for themselves? A comparative study of crowd solidarity among emergency survivors. , 2009, The British journal of social psychology.

[27]  F. Berkes,et al.  Rethinking Social Contracts: Building Resilience in a Changing Climate , 2009 .

[28]  Christopher Cocking,et al.  The Nature of Collective Resilience: Survivor Reactions to the 2005 London Bombings , 2009, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[29]  T. Postmes,et al.  Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Institutional Discrimination, Individual Racism, and Hurricane Katrina , 2006 .

[31]  K. Tierney,et al.  Metaphors Matter: Disaster Myths, Media Frames, and Their Consequences in Hurricane Katrina , 2006 .

[32]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[33]  J. Drury,et al.  The Intergroup Dynamics of Collective Empowerment: Substantiating the Social Identity Model of Crowd Behavior , 1999 .

[34]  A Oliver-Smith,et al.  Successes and failures in post-disaster resettlement. , 1991, Disasters.

[35]  M. Zaman The Social and Political Context of Adjustment to Riverbank Erosion Hazard and Population Resettlement in Bangladesh , 1989 .

[36]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[37]  E. Quarantelli DISASTER CRISIS MANAGEMENT: A SUMMARY OF RESEARCH FINDINGS , 1988 .

[38]  Eduardo García España Terminology , 1973, Hybrid Nuclear Energy Systems.

[39]  Dan Bulley Everyday Life and Death in the Global City , 2019, After Grenfell.

[40]  G. Rubin,et al.  Emergent social identities in a flood: Implications for community psychosocial resilience , 2018 .

[41]  J. Drury,et al.  Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes , 2005 .

[42]  G. Guest,et al.  How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability , 2005 .

[43]  K. Mahtani,et al.  Volunteering during the COVID-19 pandemic: What are the potential benefits to people’s well-being? , 2022 .