On the design of large systems subject to uncertainty

ABSTRACT Top-down development following the V-model of systems engineering can help to deal effectively with uncertainty in systems design without a particular uncertainty model. Often in industrial practice, however, concrete design steps are difficult to identify using the general theory – and the V-model remains a theoretical construct. This paper presents a simple but effective framework for systems engineers to connect the V-model theory with quantitative design methods, thus enabling a structured process for the systematic distributed design of large multi-disciplinary systems subject to uncertainty. The framework proposed includes three distinct steps: first, the system structure is modelled by specifying all relevant dependencies between system variables (i.e. design variables and objective quantities) in a hierarchical dependency graph. This simple formalism provides a concrete structure for the design process. Second, quantitative bottom-up mappings between system variables are established by physical or mathematical models. Third, quantitative top-down mappings are used to provide regions of permissible designs, so-called solution spaces. They encompass variability related to epistemic uncertainty and are maximised for the integration of requirements from different disciplines. They are computed by existing numerical algorithms or a projection technique. Several vehicle design problems demonstrate the general applicability and the effectiveness of the approach.

[1]  Markus Zimmermann,et al.  Direct computation of solution spaces , 2017 .

[2]  Markus Zimmermann,et al.  On the calibration of simplified vehicle crash models , 2014 .

[3]  R. Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution , 2004 .

[4]  D G Krige,et al.  A statistical approach to some mine valuation and allied problems on the Witwatersrand , 2015 .

[5]  Tim Weilkiens,et al.  Systems engineering with SysML / UML - modeling, analysis, design , 2007 .

[6]  Victor R. Basili,et al.  Iterative and incremental developments. a brief history , 2003, Computer.

[7]  Tao Jiang,et al.  Target Cascading in Optimal System Design , 2003, DAC 2000.

[8]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? , 2009 .

[9]  Markus Zimmermann,et al.  Product Family Design With Solution Spaces , 2015 .

[10]  J. Dixon,et al.  Engineering Design , 2019, Springer Handbook of Mechanical Engineering.

[11]  ChangHwan Kim,et al.  Development of simplified models for design and optimization of automotive structures for crashworthiness , 2001 .

[12]  Simon Frederick Königs Konzeption und Realisierung einer Methode zur templategestützten Systementwicklung , 2013 .

[13]  Markus Zimmermann,et al.  Robust Design using classical optimization , 2015 .

[14]  Brigitte Moench,et al.  Engineering Design A Systematic Approach , 2016 .

[15]  Roshanak Nilchiani,et al.  A contribution to the scientific foundations of systems engineering: Solution spaces and requirements , 2017 .

[16]  D. Krige A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand, by D.G. Krige, published in the Journal, December 1951 : introduction by the author , 1951 .

[17]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Convergence properties of analytical target cascading , 2002 .

[18]  H. Harbrecht,et al.  On the computation of solution spaces in high dimensions , 2016 .

[19]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[20]  J. Mackie,et al.  The cement of the universe : a study of causation , 1977 .

[21]  Markus Zimmermann,et al.  An inexpensive estimate of failure probability for high-dimensional systems with uncertainty , 2012 .

[22]  Bernhard E. Boser,et al.  A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers , 1992, COLT '92.

[23]  Peter Eberhard,et al.  Identification of validated multibody vehicle models for crash analysis using a hybrid optimization procedure , 2011 .

[24]  Magnus Karlberg,et al.  State of the art in simulation-driven design , 2013 .

[25]  Markus Zimmermann,et al.  Computing solution spaces for robust design , 2013 .

[26]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  An Interval-Based Focalization Method for Decision-Making in Decentralized, Multi-Functional Design , 2005, DAC 2005.

[27]  N. Suh Complexity in Engineering , 2005 .

[28]  Martin Eigner,et al.  Modellbasierte virtuelle Produktentwicklung , 2014 .

[29]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Toyota's Principles of Set-Based Concurrent Engineering , 1999 .

[30]  Bernhard Sendhoff,et al.  Robust Optimization - A Comprehensive Survey , 2007 .

[31]  Kailash Nath Gupta,et al.  TORQUE ROLL AXIS AND ITS INFLUENCE ON AUTOMOTIVE ENGINE MOUNTlNGS , 1962 .

[32]  Wei Chen,et al.  An innovative orders-of-magnitude AHP approach of leading industries selection: Case study of Jiangbei Industrial Clusters in China , 2014 .

[33]  Rajendra Singh,et al.  ANALYTICAL METHODS OF DECOUPLING THE AUTOMOTIVE ENGINE TORQUE ROLL AXIS , 2000 .

[34]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[35]  W. Greene,et al.  计量经济分析 = Econometric analysis , 2009 .

[36]  Lavinia Hall Negotiation: Strategies for Mutual Gain , 1992 .

[37]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Comparison of ilities for protection against uncertainty in system design , 2013 .

[38]  Omar M. Knio,et al.  Spectral Methods for Uncertainty Quantification , 2010 .

[39]  Markus Zimmermann,et al.  Identifying Key Parameters for Design Improvement in High-Dimensional Systems With Uncertainty , 2014 .

[40]  William W. Finch,et al.  A SET-BASED SYSTEM FOR ELIMINATING INFEASIBLE DESIGNS IN ENGINEERING PROBLEMS DOMINATED BY UNCERTAINTY , 1997 .

[41]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[42]  Fabian Duddeck,et al.  A Semi-Analytical Approach to Identify Solution Spaces for Crashworthiness in Vehicle Architectures , 2015 .

[43]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[44]  Rüdiger Rackwitz,et al.  Optimal design under time-variant reliability constraints , 2000 .

[45]  Massimiliano Gobbi,et al.  Optimal Design of Complex Mechanical Systems: With Applications to Vehicle Engineering , 2006 .

[46]  Roger Jianxin Jiao,et al.  Product family design and platform-based product development: a state-of-the-art review , 2007, J. Intell. Manuf..