Subliminal Smells can Guide Social Preferences

It is widely accepted that unconscious processes can modulate judgments and behavior, but do such influences affect one's daily interactions with other people? Given that olfactory information has relatively direct access to cortical and subcortical emotional circuits, we tested whether the affective content of subliminal odors alters social preferences. Participants rated the likeability of neutral faces after smelling pleasant, neutral, or unpleasant odors delivered below detection thresholds. Odor affect significantly shifted likeability ratings only for those participants lacking conscious awareness of the smells, as verified by chance-level trial-by-trial performance on an odor-detection task. Across participants, the magnitude of this priming effect decreased as sensitivity for odor detection increased. In contrast, heart rate responses tracked odor valence independently of odor awareness. These results indicate that social preferences are subject to influences from odors that escape awareness, whereas the availability of conscious odor information may disrupt such effects.

[1]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  An illusion of memory: false recognition influenced by unconscious perception , 1989 .

[2]  A. Yonelinas,et al.  Separating sensitivity from response bias: implications of comparisons of yes-no and forced-choice tests for models and measures of recognition memory. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  H. Kelley.  The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .

[4]  M. Bensafi,et al.  Modulation of visual event-related potentials by emotional olfactory stimuli , 2002, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  J. Lundström,et al.  Subthreshold amounts of social odorant affect mood, but not behavior, in heterosexual women when tested by a male, but not a female, experimenter , 2005, Biological Psychology.

[6]  P Walla,et al.  Early cortical activation indicates preparation for retrieval of memory for faces: an event-related potential study , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  E. Köster,et al.  Proactive and retroactive interference in implicit odor memory. , 2002, Chemical senses.

[8]  E P Köster,et al.  Odors: implicit memory and performance effects. , 1999, Chemical senses.

[9]  R. Fazio.  On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview , 2001 .

[10]  Deborah E. Hannula,et al.  Imaging implicit perception: promise and pitfalls , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  C. Wysocki,et al.  Ability to perceive androstenone can be acquired by ostensibly anosmic people. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Carole Ober,et al.  Paternally inherited HLA alleles are associated with women's choice of male odor , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[13]  R. Zajonc.  On the primacy of affect. , 1984 .

[14]  J. Price,et al.  Central olfactory connections in the macaque monkey , 1994, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  T. Parrish,et al.  Learning to Smell the Roses: Experience-Dependent Neural Plasticity in Human Piriform and Orbitofrontal Cortices , 2006, Neuron.

[16]  J. Gottfried,et al.  Smell: central nervous processing. , 2006, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[17]  J. Schooler,et al.  A naturalistic study of autobiographical memories evoked by olfactory and visual cues: testing the Proustian hypothesis. , 2002, The American journal of psychology.

[18]  S. Schiffman.  Physicochemical correlates of olfactory quality. , 1974, Science.

[19]  M. Ferguson,et al.  Beyond behaviorism: on the automaticity of higher mental processes. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  Wen Li,et al.  Neural and Behavioral Evidence for Affective Priming from Unconsciously Perceived Emotional Facial Expressions and the Influence of Trait Anxiety , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Gerald Leonard,et al.  Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in the connecticut chemosensory clinical research center , 1988, The Laryngoscope.

[22]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled & automatic processing: behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  A. Dittmar,et al.  Odor hedonics: connection with emotional response estimated by autonomic parameters. , 1997, Chemical senses.

[24]  V. Lamme,et al.  Repression of unconscious information by conscious processing: evidence from affective blindsight induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  James M Kilner,et al.  Integrated Neural Representations of Odor Intensity and Affective Valence in Human Amygdala , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  J. Bargh.  Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. , 1989 .

[27]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Can One Suppress Subliminal Words? , 2006, Neuron.

[29]  G. Shepherd.  The Human Sense of Smell: Are We Better Than We Think? , 2004, PLoS biology.

[30]  G. Clore,et al.  Feelings and phenomenal experiences , 1996 .