Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern

A social-psychological model is developed to examine the proposition that environmentalism represents a new way of thinking. It presumes that action in support of environmental quality may derive from any of three value orientations: egoistic, social-altruistic, or biospheric, and that gender may be implicated in the relation between these orientations and behavior. Behavioral intentions are modeled as the sum across values of the strength of a value times the strength of beliefs about the consequences of environmental conditions for valued objects. Evidence from a survey of 349 college students shows that beliefs about consequences for each type of valued object independently predict willingness to take political action, but only beliefs about consequences for self reliably predict willingness to pay through taxes. This result is consistent with other recent findings from contingent valuation surveys. Women have stronger beliefs than men about consequences for self, others, and the biosphere, but there is no gender difference in the strength of value orientations.

[1]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Valuing environmental resources: A constructive approach , 1993 .

[2]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Preference reversals and the measurement of environmental values , 1993 .

[3]  T. Burns,et al.  Human Agency and the Evolutionary Dynamics of Culture , 1992 .

[4]  R. Eckersley,et al.  Environmentalism And Political Theory: Toward An Ecocentric Approach , 1992 .

[5]  Paul Mohai,et al.  Men, women, and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism , 1992 .

[6]  H. Longino,et al.  What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge , 1992 .

[7]  D. Nelkin,et al.  The Animal Rights Crusade: The Growth of a Moral Protest , 1991 .

[8]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Public Opinion in the 1980s Clear Consensus, Ambiguous Commitment , 1991 .

[9]  Stuart Oskamp,et al.  Factors Influencing Household Recycling Behavior , 1991 .

[10]  Joseph R. Hopper,et al.  Recycling as Altruistic Behavior , 1991 .

[11]  Janet Biehl.  Rethinking ecofeminist politics , 1991 .

[12]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior , 1991 .

[13]  H. Simon,et al.  A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism. , 1990, Science.

[14]  Joachim Schahn,et al.  Studies of Individual Environmental Concern , 1990 .

[15]  G. Orenstein,et al.  Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Ecofeminism , 1990 .

[16]  A. Brennan,et al.  Thinking About Nature: An Investigation of Nature, Value and Ecology. , 1990 .

[17]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Evolutionary theory in sociology: An examination of current thinking , 1990 .

[18]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. , 1990 .

[19]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  Insights in decision making : a tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn , 1990 .

[20]  R. Inglehart.  Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society , 1991 .

[21]  Charles C. Harris,et al.  Improving the contingent valuation method: A psychological perspective , 1989 .

[22]  J. Grusec,et al.  Sex differences in reasoning and emotion about altruism , 1989 .

[23]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[24]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Definitions of conflict and the legitimation of resources: The case of environmental risk , 1989 .

[25]  Arne Naess,et al.  Ecology, community, and lifestyle , 1989 .

[26]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[27]  D. Eckberg,et al.  Environmental issues as women’s issues: General concerns and local hazards , 1989 .

[28]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  The economics of empathic helping: Support for a mood management motive , 1988 .

[29]  Bill Devall.  Simple in Means, Rich in Ends: Practicing Deep Ecology , 1988 .

[30]  J. Tronto,et al.  Beyond Gender Difference to a Theory of Care , 1987, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[31]  K. Deaux,et al.  Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. , 1987 .

[32]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Estimation with Cross-National Data: Robust and Nonparametric Methods , 1987 .

[33]  Thomas A. Arcury,et al.  Sex differences in environmental concern and knowledge: The case of acid rain , 1987 .

[34]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  Empathy-based helping: is it selflessly or selfishly motivated? , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  J. M. Hines,et al.  Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. , 1987 .

[36]  F. Buttel.  NEW DIRECTIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIOLOGY , 1987 .

[37]  I. Altman,et al.  Handbook of environmental psychology , 1987 .

[38]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  P. Richerson,et al.  Culture and the Evolutionary Process , 1988 .

[40]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Support for environmental protection: The role of moral norms , 1985 .

[41]  L. Hamilton.  Who Cares about Water Pollution? Opinions in a Small‐Town Crisis* , 1985 .

[42]  P. Stern,et al.  Personal and contextual influences on househould energy adaptations. , 1985 .

[43]  Bill Devall,et al.  Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered , 1985 .

[44]  L. Milbrath,et al.  Environmentalists: Vanguard for a New Society , 1985 .

[45]  Charles J. Brody,et al.  Differences by Sex in Support for Nuclear Power , 1984 .

[46]  Edward J. Walsh,et al.  Social Movement Involvement in the Wake of a Nuclear Accident: Activists and Free Riders in the TMI Area , 1983 .

[47]  Frances Borzello,et al.  The image of women's studies , 1983 .

[48]  C. Gilligan.  In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1982. , 1982 .

[49]  Carolyn Merchant,et al.  The death of nature : women, ecology, and the scientific revolution , 1982 .

[50]  S. Cotgrove.  Catastrophe or cornucopia: The environment, politics, and the future , 1982 .

[51]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  New Social Movements , 1981, Telos.

[52]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations and Empirical Evidence , 1980 .

[53]  Ulf Olsson,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient , 1979 .

[54]  W. Austin.  Sex differences in bystander intervention in a theft. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  D. Dillman.  Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[56]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The “New Environmental Paradigm” , 1978 .

[57]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Moral Norms and Environmental Behavior: An Application of Schwartz's Norm-Activation Model to Yard Burning1 , 1978 .

[58]  R. Borden,et al.  Who cares about ecology? Personality and sex differences in environmental concern. , 1978, Journal of personality.

[59]  R. Dunlap,et al.  THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM: 5 PROPOSED MEASURING INSTRUMENT AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS , 1978 .

[60]  Riley E. Dunlap,et al.  Response to Heberlein's Rejoinder , 1977 .

[61]  T. Heberlein.  Norm Activation and Environmental Action: A Rejoinder to R. E. Dunlap and K. D. Van Liere , 1977 .

[62]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Land Ethic or Golden Rule:Comment on “Land Ethic Realized” by Thomas A. Heberlein, JSI, 28(4), 1972 , 1977 .

[63]  S. Schwartz.  Normative Influences on Altruism , 1977 .

[64]  Thomas A. Heberlein,et al.  Attitudinal specificity and the prediction of behavior in a field setting. , 1976 .

[65]  M. Rokeach.  The Nature Of Human Values , 1974 .

[66]  T. Heberlein.  The Land Ethic Realized: Some Social Psychological Explanations for Changing Environmental Attitudes1 , 1972 .

[67]  R. Trivers.  The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[68]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[69]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  Awareness of Consequences and the Influence of Moral Norms on Interpersonal Behavior , 1968 .

[70]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  WORDS, DEEDS, AND THE PERCEPTION OF CONSEQUENCES AND RESPONSIBILITY IN ACTION SITUATIONS ' , 1968 .

[71]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1965 .

[72]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[73]  J. M. Buchanan,et al.  Individual Choice in Voting and the Market , 1954, Journal of Political Economy.

[74]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[75]  T. L. Scheid-Cook,et al.  A Sand County Almanac , 1949 .