Who Chooses to Carpool and Why?

The debate over high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) and high-occupancy toll lane efficiency has raised questions about whether HOVs should be given preferential treatment on managed lanes and the potential impacts of different preferential treatments. This research questions why people choose their mode of travel by examining characteristics of carpoolers and single-occupancy vehicles, reasons for their travel mode choice, and carpool formation, on the basis of a survey of travelers in Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston in Texas. Carpool users rated the ability to use HOV lanes as the most important factor in their decision to form a carpool. Enjoying traveling with others ranked second, followed by reasons such as saving time, helping the environment and society, and sharing vehicle costs. Carpool partner matching programs, employer carpool incentives, and preferred parking at work were generally the least important factors in travelers' consideration of carpooling. The importance of various factors changed significantly if the respondent was on a work or commute trip versus other trip modes. Travelers on work or commute trips ranked travel time savings and cost sharing much higher, as expected, because of their frequent travel during peak hours. The data also support evidence of a significant amount of “fampooling,” with nearly 75% of carpools consisting of family members. The implications of these findings are discussed.

[1]  D A Hensher,et al.  The value of commuter travel time savings: empirical estimation using an alternative valuation model , 1976 .

[2]  Martin Williams,et al.  FACTORS AFFECTING MODAL CHOICE DECISIONS IN URBAN TRAVEL , 1978 .

[3]  Mary Lynn Tischer,et al.  An empirical analysis of behavioral intentions of single-occupant auto drivers to shift to high occupancy vehicles , 1979 .

[4]  R. Teal Carpooling: Who, how and why☆ , 1987 .

[5]  John Treherne,et al.  In the fast lane , 1989, Nature.

[6]  Sergio R. Jara-Díaz,et al.  Detection of income effect in mode choice: theory and application , 1989 .

[7]  Anindya Sinha,et al.  Some like it hot . . . , 1992, Nature.

[8]  Sandra Rosenbloom,et al.  Gender Differences in Commuter Travel in Tucson: Implications for Travel Demand Management Programs , 2004 .

[9]  E. Ferguson,et al.  Psychological benefits from vanpooling and group composition , 1994 .

[10]  G C Skipper THE LONELY ROAD , 1996 .

[11]  Joseph S. DeSalvo,et al.  Income, Residential Location, and Mode Choice☆ , 1996 .

[12]  R. Cervero MIXED LAND-USES AND COMMUTING: EVIDENCE FROM THE AMERICAN HOUSING SURVEY , 1996 .

[13]  A. Pisarski Commuting in America II: The Second National Report on Commuting Patterns and Trends , 1996 .

[14]  E. Ferguson The rise and fall of the American carpool: 1970–1990 , 1997 .

[15]  B. Verplanken,et al.  Habit and information use in travel mode choices , 1997 .

[16]  R. Kitamura,et al.  A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .

[17]  R. Crane,et al.  DOES NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN INFLUENCE TRAVEL?: A BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS OF TRAVEL DIARY AND GIS DATA , 1998 .

[18]  R. Poole,et al.  BUILDING A CASE FOR HOT LANES: A NEW APPROACH TO REDUCING URBAN HIGHWAY CONGESTION , 1999 .

[19]  Jianling Li,et al.  Explaining high-occupancy-toll lane use , 2001 .

[20]  M Jaskevich MIXED REVIEWS FOR HOV LANES , 2001 .

[21]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  The influence of land use on travel behavior: specification and estimation strategies , 2001 .

[22]  Joy Dahlgren,et al.  High-occupancy/toll lanes: where should they be implemented? , 2002 .

[23]  Paying the value price , 2003 .

[24]  J. Garvill,et al.  Effects of increased awareness on choice of travel mode , 2003 .

[25]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Choice of Travel Mode in the Theory of Planned Behavior: The Roles of Past Behavior, Habit, and Reasoned Action , 2003 .

[26]  G Groat THE BELT : A CLOSER LOOK AT HOW I-495 OFFICIALS SOLD THE HOT LANE CONCEPT , 2004 .

[27]  Pravin Varaiya What We've Learned About Highway Congestion , 2005 .

[28]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  How do individuals adapt their personal travel? Objective and subjective influences on the consideration of travel-related strategies for San Francisco Bay Area commuters , 2005 .

[29]  Xinyu Cao,et al.  How do individuals adapt their personal travel? A conceptual exploration of the consideration of travel-related strategies , 2005 .

[30]  Robert W Poole,et al.  Virtual Exclusive Busways: Improving Urban Transit while Relieving Congestion , 2005 .

[31]  Robert W Poole,et al.  Adding FAST Lanes to Milwaukee's Freeways: Congestion Relief, Improved Transit, and Help with Funding Reconstruction , 2006 .

[32]  Maria Johansson,et al.  The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice , 2006 .

[33]  C. Winston,et al.  Differentiated Road Pricing, Express Lanes and Carpools: Exploiting Heterogeneous Preferences in Policy Design , 2006 .

[34]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  The Impact of Stop-Making and Travel Time Reliability on Commute Mode Choice , 2006 .

[35]  Xin Ye,et al.  An Exploration of the Relationship Between Mode Choice and Complexity of Trip Chaining Patterns , 2007 .