A novel model validation methodology using synchrophasor measurements

Abstract The validation of simulation models is a crucial step in power system security analysis. In this paper, a new methodology is proposed to approach this problem, using events recorded by a synchrophasor measurement system. The method is based on the characteristics of a new discrepancy index, denoted here as Global Discrepancy Indicator (GDI), and trajectories correlation. The GDI gives a quantitative measure of the model discrepancy with respect to the real system. It allows for the integration of the three main parts of the validation process and permits the selection of the differences minimization interval in the calibration phase. In addition, a ranking of the GDI sensitivities is used to identify an initial subset of problematic model parameters. The correlations between trajectory differences and trajectory sensitivities aid in the selection of the final subset of candidates to problematic parameters for calibration. The extended Least Squares Estimation is then used to automatically tune the identified problematic parameters. The complete methodology was tested and has shown its capability to improve the models coherency.

[1]  Ali Keyhani,et al.  On-line synchronous machine parameter estimation from small disturbance operating data , 1995 .

[2]  R.-M. He,et al.  Wide area measurements-based model validation and its application , 2008 .

[3]  Quan Pan,et al.  On-line identification of synchronous generator parameter from large disturbance testing data , 1998, POWERCON '98. 1998 International Conference on Power System Technology. Proceedings (Cat. No.98EX151).

[4]  J. Chow,et al.  A trajectory sensitivity method for the identification of nonlinear excitation system models , 1993 .

[5]  John A. Jacquez,et al.  DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS , 1998 .

[6]  G. Verghese,et al.  Subset selection for improved parameter estimation in on-line identification of a synchronous generator , 1999 .

[7]  J. S. Edmonds,et al.  Trajectory sensitivity based identification of synchronous generator and excitation system parameters , 1988 .

[8]  G. T. Heydt,et al.  Nonlinear Estimation of Synchronous Machine Parameters Using Operating Data , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[9]  I. C. Decker,et al.  Hybrid simulations, a smart way to perform parameter validation in power systems , 2011, 2011 IEEE PES CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES LATIN AMERICA (ISGT LA).

[10]  Pengwei Du,et al.  Generator dynamic model validation and parameter calibration using phasor measurements at the point of connection , 2013, 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition.

[11]  D. Theilliol,et al.  Automation in mining, mineral, and metal processing 2004 (MMM '04) : a proceedings volume from the 11th IFAC Symposium, Nancy, France, 8-10 September 2004 , 2005 .

[12]  I.A. Hiskens,et al.  Estimating wind turbine parameters and quantifying their effects on dynamic behavior , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[13]  M. T. Mendoza,et al.  Using trajectory sensitivity for different models and operation conditions for synchronous generator parameter estimation , 2010, The XIX International Conference on Electrical Machines - ICEM 2010.

[14]  Zhenyu Huang,et al.  Benchmarking of planning models using recorded dynamics , 2009, 2009 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[15]  H. Chiang,et al.  Multiple Solutions and Plateau Phenomenon in Measurement-Based Load Model Development: Issues and Suggestions , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  Zhengming Zhao,et al.  A dynamic on-line parameter identification and full-scale system experimental verification for large synchronous machines , 1995 .

[17]  Thierry Bastogne,et al.  Calibration of Nonlinear and Continuous-Time Models. Application of Diffedge© to a Winding Process , 2004 .

[18]  I. C. Decker,et al.  System wide model validation of the Brazilian Interconnected Power System , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[19]  Zhenyu Huang,et al.  Model validation with hybrid dynamic simulation , 2006, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[20]  S. Kay Intuitive Probability and Random Processes using MATLAB , 2005 .

[21]  Janusz Bialek,et al.  Power System Dynamics: Stability and Control , 2008 .