Parallel construction of orthologous sequence-ready clone contig maps in multiple species.

Comparison is a fundamental tool for analyzing DNA sequence. Interspecies sequence comparison is particularly powerful for inferring genome function and is based on the simple premise that conserved sequences are likely to be important. Thus, the comparison of a genomic sequence with its orthologous counterpart from another species is increasingly becoming an integral component of genome analysis. In ideal situations, such comparisons are performed with orthologous sequences from multiple species. To facilitate multispecies comparative sequence analysis, a robust and scalable strategy for simultaneously constructing sequence-ready bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) contig maps from targeted genomic regions has been developed. Central to this approach is the generation and utilization of "universal" oligonucleotide-based hybridization probes ("overgo" probes), which are designed from sequences that are highly conserved between distantly related species. Large collections of these probes are used en masse to screen BAC libraries from multiple species in parallel, with the isolated clones assembled into physical contig maps. To validate the effectiveness of this strategy, efforts were focused on the construction of BAC-based physical maps from multiple mammalian species (chimpanzee, baboon, cat, dog, cow, and pig). Using available human and mouse genomic sequence and a newly developed computer program to design the requisite probes, sequence-ready maps were constructed in all species for a series of targeted regions totaling approximately 16 Mb in the human genome. The described approach can be used to facilitate the multispecies comparative sequencing of targeted genomic regions and can be adapted for constructing BAC contig maps in other vertebrates.

[1]  Webb Miller,et al.  So many genomes, so little time , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  E. Green,et al.  Sequence-tagged site (STS) content mapping of human chromosomes: theoretical considerations and early experiences. , 1991, PCR methods and applications.

[3]  Timothy B. Stockwell,et al.  The Sequence of the Human Genome , 2001, Science.

[4]  R A Gibbs,et al.  Comparing vertebrate whole-genome shotgun reads to the human genome. , 2001, Genome research.

[5]  P. D. de Jong,et al.  A porcine BAC library with tenfold genome coverage: a resource for physical and genetic map integration , 2001, Mammalian Genome.

[6]  Paul Richardson,et al.  Human Chromosome 19 and Related Regions in Mouse: Conservative and Lineage-Specific Evolution , 2001, Science.

[7]  S. O’Brien,et al.  The promise of comparative genomics in mammals. , 1999, Science.

[8]  A. Bradley,et al.  The mouse genome sequence: status and prospects. , 2001, Genomics.

[9]  A. Monaco,et al.  Construction and characterization of a 10-fold genome equivalent rat P1-derived artificial chromosome library. , 1998, Genomics.

[10]  E. Green,et al.  Comparative genome mapping in the sequence-based era: early experience with human chromosome 7. , 2000, Genome research.

[11]  Elaine R. Mardis,et al.  In Genome analysis: A laboratory manual , 1997 .

[12]  D. Mccormick Sequence the Human Genome , 1986, Bio/Technology.

[13]  Eric D. Green,et al.  Comparative physical mapping of targeted regions of the rat genome , 2001, Mammalian Genome.

[14]  D. Curtis Jamison,et al.  ComboScreen facilitates the multiplex hybridization-based screening of high-density clone arrays , 2000, Bioinform..

[15]  C. Lawrence,et al.  Human-mouse genome comparisons to locate regulatory sites , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[16]  Paramvir S. Dehal,et al.  Homology-driven assembly of a sequence-ready mouse BAC contig map spanning regions related to the 46-Mb gene-rich euchromatic segments of human chromosome 19. , 2001, Genomics.

[17]  S. P. Fodor,et al.  Evolutionarily conserved sequences on human chromosome 21. , 2001, Genome research.

[18]  L. Hinton,et al.  Construction and characterization of an eightfold redundant dog genomic bacterial artificial chromosome library. , 1999, Genomics.

[19]  Carol Soderlund,et al.  FPC: a system for building contigs from restriction fingerprinted clones , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[20]  E. Green Strategies for the systematic sequencing of complex genomes , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[21]  R. Hardison Conserved noncoding sequences are reliable guides to regulatory elements. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[22]  J. V. Moran,et al.  Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. , 2001, Nature.

[23]  Timothy P. L. Smith,et al.  Construction and characterization of a new bovine bacterial artificial chromosome library with 10 genome-equivalent coverage , 2000, Mammalian Genome.

[24]  The International HapMap Consortium,et al.  A physical map of the human genome , 2001 .

[25]  R. Gibbs,et al.  PipMaker--a web server for aligning two genomic DNA sequences. , 2000, Genome research.

[26]  A. Dehejia,et al.  Human and mouse alpha-synuclein genes: comparative genomic sequence analysis and identification of a novel gene regulatory element. , 2001, Genome research.

[27]  T. F. Laughlin,et al.  Comparative anchor tagged sequences (CATS) for integrative mapping of mammalian genomes , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[28]  R. Wilson,et al.  High throughput fingerprint analysis of large-insert clones. , 1997, Genome research.

[29]  L. Pennacchio,et al.  Genomic strategies to identify mammalian regulatory sequences , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[30]  Webb Miller,et al.  Generation and Comparative Analysis of ∼3.3 Mb of Mouse Genomic Sequence Orthologous to the Region of Human Chromosome 7q11.23 Implicated in Williams Syndrome , 2002 .

[31]  C. Soderlund,et al.  Contigs built with fingerprints, markers, and FPC V4.7. , 2000, Genome research.