Identifying sustainability communicators in urban regeneration: Integrating individual and relational attributes

Abstract The paper advances a conceptualization of sustainability in urban regeneration as communicative practice taking place within networks of social actors. To demonstrate the potential of this perspective, we propose an interdisciplinary methodology integrating social network analysis from sociology and multi-criteria decision analysis (fuzzy logic) from operations research to calculate a sustainability communicator score for each actor involved in a regeneration network. The score is based on three dimensions: a sustainability vision (relying on the three pillar model of sustainability), a formal network influence dimension (based on organizational practice and decision-making position) and an informal network influence dimension (drawing on degree, betweenness, eigenvector and closeness centrality measures from social network analysis). The framework allows the identification and ranking of sustainability communicators, based on the preferences of specific users, while also allowing for variable degrees of vagueness. We illustrate the methodology by means of a case study of a social network of actors (N = 28) involved in the sustainable regeneration of a brownfield site in Porto Marghera, Venice, Italy. The methodology is expandable beyond the actor level to allow for the ranking of more complex network configurations for promoting sustainability.

[1]  B. Crona,et al.  The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? , 2009 .

[2]  L. Zadeh The role of fuzzy logic in the management of uncertainty in expert systems , 1983 .

[3]  Sara Wilkinson,et al.  A green profession? A global survey of RICS members and their engagement with the sustainability agenda , 2008 .

[4]  Barney B. Roberts,et al.  Integrated Risk Assessment: A Case Study , 1996 .

[5]  C. P. Nathanail,et al.  Sustainable Brownfield Regeneration , 2011 .

[6]  M. Redclift Sustainable Development (1987-2005) - An Oxymoron Comes of Age , 2006 .

[7]  C. Rogers,et al.  Conceptualising Sustainability in UK Urban Regeneration: a Discursive Formation , 2011 .

[8]  Connectives I. Burhan Turksen Interval Valued Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy , 1993 .

[9]  Örjan Bodin,et al.  Social Networks and Natural Resource Management , 2011 .

[10]  N Witters,et al.  Developing principles of sustainability and stakeholder engagement for "gentle" remediation approaches: the European context. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Network Analysis in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[12]  C. P. Nathanail,et al.  Sticks and Stones: The Impact of the Definitions of Brownfield in Policies on Socio-Economic Sustainability , 2012 .

[13]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[14]  B. Littig,et al.  Social sustainability: a catchword between political pragmatism and social theory , 2005 .

[15]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[16]  S. Giove,et al.  Integrated risk assessment for WFD ecological status classification applied to Llobregat river basin (Spain). Part I-Fuzzy approach to aggregate biological indicators. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  Matthias Gross,et al.  Sustainability assessment and the revitalization of contaminated sites: operationalizing sustainable development for local problems , 2010 .

[18]  Michael J. Lorr Defining Urban Sustainability in the Context of North American Cities , 2012 .

[19]  Vasja Vehovar,et al.  Web Survey Methodology , 2015 .

[20]  Abir Al-Tabbaa,et al.  Sustainability: A new imperative in contaminated land remediation , 2014 .

[21]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Toward a generalized theory of uncertainty (GTU)--an outline , 2005, Inf. Sci..

[22]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Conceptualising sustainability assessment , 2004 .

[23]  M. Sugeno,et al.  Structure identification of fuzzy model , 1988 .

[24]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Is there a need for fuzzy logic? , 2008, NAFIPS 2008 - 2008 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society.

[25]  Anita Stoilkov-Koneski,et al.  Social and cultural context as an indicator of sustainability of brownfield regeneration , 2015 .

[26]  Joe Doak,et al.  (Re)development, Complexity and Networks: A Framework for Research , 2007 .

[27]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[28]  Joe Doak,et al.  Actor Networks: The Brownfield Merry‐Go‐Round , 2008 .

[29]  J. Elkington Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development , 1994 .

[30]  G. Choquet Theory of capacities , 1954 .

[31]  Vasja Vehovar,et al.  Open-ended vs. close-ended questions in Web questionnaires , 2003 .

[32]  P. Healey The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory and its Implications for Spatial Strategy Formation , 1996 .

[33]  C. Prell Social Network Analysis: History, Theory and Methodology , 2011 .

[34]  Gernot Grabher,et al.  The Project Ecology of Advertising: Tasks, Talents and Teams , 2002 .

[35]  Michael Scott,et al.  Re-theorizing social network analysis and environmental governance , 2015 .

[36]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Theoretical Foundations for Centrality Measures , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[38]  Simon Parris,et al.  The embedded developer: using project ecologies to analyse local property development networks , 2013 .

[39]  M. Sugeno,et al.  Non-monotonic fuzzy measures and the Choquet integral , 1994 .

[40]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[41]  Michio Sugeno,et al.  Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[42]  Henrik Åhman,et al.  Social sustainability – society at the intersection of development and maintenance , 2013 .

[43]  C. P. Nathanail,et al.  Integrating the Social Dimension in Remediation Decision-Making: State of the Practice and Way Forward , 2015 .

[44]  S. Giove,et al.  Regional risk assessment for contaminated sites part 1: vulnerability assessment by multicriteria decision analysis. , 2011, Environment international.

[45]  Patrick Mcalpine,et al.  Is there a correct way of establishing sustainability indicators? The case of sustainability indicator development on the Island of Guernsey , 2005 .

[46]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[47]  I. Turksen Interval-valued fuzzy sets and “compensatory AND” , 1992 .

[48]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Decision Support Systems and Environment: Role of MCDA , 2009 .

[49]  T. Dixon Integrating Sustainability into Brownfield Regeneration: Rhetoric or Reality? – An Analysis of the UK Development Industry , 2006 .

[50]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[51]  Paul Bardos,et al.  Comparison of international approaches to sustainable remediation. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[52]  Magnus Boström,et al.  A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: introduction to the special issue , 2012 .

[53]  Igor Linkov,et al.  A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approach for Prioritization of Performance Metrics , 2007 .

[54]  Örjan Bodin,et al.  Some basic structural characteristics of networks , 2011 .