Crystal structure of a POU/HMG/DNA ternary complex suggests differential assembly of Oct4 and Sox2 on two enhancers.

Members of the POU and SOX transcription factor families exemplify the partnerships established between various transcriptional regulators during early embryonic development. Although functional cooperativity between key regulator proteins is pivotal for milestone decisions in mammalian development, little is known about the underlying molecular mechanisms. In this study, we focus on two transcription factors, Oct4 and Sox2, as their combination on DNA is considered to direct the establishment of the first three lineages in the mammalian embryo. Using experimental high-resolution structure determination, followed by model building and experimental validation, we found that Oct4 and Sox2 were able to dimerize onto DNA in distinct conformational arrangements. We demonstrate that the DNA enhancer region of their target genes is responsible for the correct spatial alignment of glue-like interaction domains on their surface. Interestingly, these surfaces frequently have redundant functions and are instrumental in recruiting various interacting protein partners.

[1]  S. Russell,et al.  The Drosophila SOX-domain protein Dichaete is required for the development of the central nervous system midline. , 1998, Development.

[2]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Molecular basis of human 46X,Y sex reversal revealed from the three-dimensional solution structure of the human SRY-DNA complex , 1995, Cell.

[3]  H. Kondoh,et al.  Pax6 and SOX2 form a co-DNA-binding partner complex that regulates initiation of lens development. , 2001, Genes & development.

[4]  R. Lovell-Badge,et al.  Sox genes find their feet. , 1997, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[5]  H. Kondoh,et al.  Mechanism of Regulatory Target Selection by the SOX High-Mobility-Group Domain Proteins as Revealed by Comparison of SOX1/2/3 and SOX9 , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[6]  R. Lovell-Badge,et al.  Multipotent cell lineages in early mouse development depend on SOX2 function. , 2003, Genes & development.

[7]  C. Basilico,et al.  Interaction between a novel F9-specific factor and octamer-binding proteins is required for cell-type-restricted activity of the fibroblast growth factor 4 enhancer , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[8]  H. Schöler,et al.  Germline regulatory element of Oct-4 specific for the totipotent cycle of embryonal cells. , 1996, Development.

[9]  Juli D. Klemm,et al.  Crystal structure of the Oct-1 POU domain bound to an octamer site: DNA recognition with tethered DNA-binding modules , 1994, Cell.

[10]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[11]  H. Kondoh,et al.  Pairing SOX off: with partners in the regulation of embryonic development. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[12]  N. Corbi,et al.  Developmental-specific activity of the FGF-4 enhancer requires the synergistic action of Sox2 and Oct-3. , 1995, Genes & development.

[13]  G. Sheldrick SHELX Applications to Macromolecules , 1998 .

[14]  M. Wegner,et al.  Cooperative Function of POU Proteins and SOX Proteins in Glial Cells* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  D. Ambrosetti,et al.  Synergistic activation of the fibroblast growth factor 4 enhancer by Sox2 and Oct-3 depends on protein-protein interactions facilitated by a specific spatial arrangement of factor binding sites , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[16]  Gerd Scherer,et al.  Direct Interaction of SRY-Related Protein SOX9 and Steroidogenic Factor 1 Regulates Transcription of the Human Anti-Müllerian Hormone Gene , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[17]  David A. Case,et al.  Structural basis for DNA bending by the architectural transcription factor LEF-1 , 1995, Nature.

[18]  M Wilmanns,et al.  Differential dimer activities of the transcription factor Oct-1 by DNA-induced interface swapping. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[19]  F. Murphy,et al.  Nonsequence-specific DNA recognition: a structural perspective. , 2000, Structure.

[20]  Wiebe Kruijer,et al.  Octamer-dependent regulation of the kFGF gene in embryonal carcinoma and embryonic stem cells , 1991, Mechanisms of Development.

[21]  G Vriend,et al.  New POU dimer configuration mediates antagonistic control of an osteopontin preimplantation enhancer by Oct-4 and Sox-2. , 1998, Genes & development.

[22]  C. Basilico,et al.  Coevolution of HMG domains and homeodomains and the generation of transcriptional regulation by Sox/POU complexes , 2001, Journal of cellular physiology.

[23]  J. Navaza,et al.  AMoRe: an automated package for molecular replacement , 1994 .

[24]  V. Harley,et al.  The DNA-binding specificity of SOX9 and other SOX proteins. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  M. Wegner,et al.  From head to toes: the multiple facets of Sox proteins. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[26]  J. Zou,et al.  Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. , 1991, Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography.

[27]  R Lavery,et al.  The definition of generalized helicoidal parameters and of axis curvature for irregular nucleic acids. , 1988, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[28]  Matthias Wilmanns,et al.  Synergism with the Coactivator OBF-1 (OCA-B, BOB-1) Is Mediated by a Specific POU Dimer Configuration , 2000, Cell.

[29]  J. Miyazaki,et al.  Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[30]  P. Sharp,et al.  Crystal structure of an OCA-B peptide bound to an Oct-1 POU domain/octamer DNA complex: specific recognition of a protein-DNA interface. , 1999, Genes & development.

[31]  M. Rosenfeld,et al.  Allosteric effects of Pit-1 DNA sites on long-term repression in cell type specification. , 2000, Science.

[32]  P Gruss,et al.  Pax genes and their roles in cell differentiation and development. , 1996, Current opinion in cell biology.

[33]  H. Schöler,et al.  Formation of Pluripotent Stem Cells in the Mammalian Embryo Depends on the POU Transcription Factor Oct4 , 1998, Cell.

[34]  Suzanne Fortier,et al.  Direct methods for solving macromolecular structures , 1998 .

[35]  Crystallization of redox-insensitive Oct1 POU domain with different DNA-response elements. , 2001, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[36]  H. Schöler,et al.  Differential activity by DNA-induced quarternary structures of POU transcription factors. , 2002, Biochemical pharmacology.

[37]  W. Herr,et al.  The POU domain: versatility in transcriptional regulation by a flexible two-in-one DNA-binding domain. , 1995, Genes & development.

[38]  Gérard Bricogne,et al.  SHARP: maximum-likelihood refinement of heavy-atom parameters in the MIR and MAD methods , 1996 .

[39]  K. Boon,et al.  UTF1, a novel transcriptional coactivator expressed in pluripotent embryonic stem cells and extra‐embryonic cells , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[40]  Akihiko Okuda,et al.  The Gene for the Embryonic Stem Cell Coactivator UTF1 Carries a Regulatory Element Which Selectively Interacts with a Complex Composed of Oct-3/4 and Sox-2 , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[41]  G Vriend,et al.  WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program. , 1990, Journal of molecular graphics.

[42]  R J Read,et al.  Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. , 1998, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[43]  H. Schöler,et al.  Modulation of the Activity of Multiple Transcriptional Activation Domains by the DNA Binding Domains Mediates the Synergistic Action of Sox2 and Oct-3 on the Fibroblast Growth Factor-4Enhancer* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[44]  R M Sweet,et al.  The structure of a chromosomal high mobility group protein–DNA complex reveals sequence‐neutral mechanisms important for non‐sequence‐specific DNA recognition , 1999, The EMBO journal.