Knowledge Reuse for Innovation

This study was conducted to better understand the knowledge reuse process when radical innovation (e.g., experiments to prepare for human exploration of Mars) is expected. The research involved detailing the knowledge reuse process in six case studies varying in degree of innovation. Across the six cases, a six-stage reuse-for-innovation process was identified consisting of three major actions: reconceptualize the problem and approach, including deciding to search for others' ideas to reuse; search-and-evaluate others' ideas to reuse; and develop the selected idea. Findings include (1) the need for an insurmountable gap in performance to stimulate the decision to reuse others' knowledge; (2) the critical importance of an adapter to bridge the idea source and recipient; (3) three layers of search-and-evaluate activities in which the first layer of scanning to find ideas to reuse and the last layer of detailed analysis of ideas are bridged by a layer of brief evaluations of ideas assessing the presence (or absence) of targeted information about each idea; and (4) the differential use of metaknowledge about each idea to facilitate proceeding through each search-and-evaluate layer. In addition, reusers in the more (versus less) innovative cases redefined problems at the outset in nontraditional ways using analogies and extensions, rather than accepting the preexisting problem definition; used a substantially broader search strategy with a greater variety of search methods; and worked more closely with adapters during the latter stages of the reuse process.

[1]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward A Theory of Knowledge Reuse : Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success , 2022 .

[2]  G. Farris,et al.  Knowledge Management in Research and Development , 2001 .

[3]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[4]  D. Leonard,et al.  The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation , 1998 .

[5]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Creativity In Context: Update To The Social Psychology Of Creativity , 1996 .

[6]  Jacky Swan,et al.  Knowledge management in action: integrating knowledge across communities , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  D. Dougherty Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[8]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Organizational Knowledge Management: A Contingency Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[10]  A. Mitchell,et al.  Radical Innovation , 2001 .

[11]  E. Rogers,et al.  Reinvention in the Innovation Process , 1980 .

[12]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[13]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  Managing the flow of technology: technology transfer and the dissemination of technological informat , 1977 .

[14]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[15]  Mary J. Culnan,et al.  Chauffeured Versus End User Access to Commercial Databases , 1983, MIS Q..

[16]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  Learning the Innovation Journey: Order out of Chaos? , 1996 .

[17]  K. D. Joshi,et al.  An investigation of factors that influence the management of knowledge in organizations , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  Knowledge management technology and the reproduction of knowledge work practices , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Amrit Tiwana The Knowledge Management Toolkit , 2000 .

[20]  Rachel Heery Review of metadata formats , 1996 .

[21]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[22]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[23]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[24]  F. Blackler Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation , 1995 .

[25]  Gabriel Szulanski The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness , 2000 .

[26]  J. March,et al.  Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking , 1987 .

[27]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[28]  B. Frey,et al.  Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms , 2000 .

[29]  Stefan H. Thomke,et al.  Managing Experimentation in the Design of New Products , 1998 .

[30]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[31]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[32]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[33]  Melissa M. Appleyard,et al.  HOW DOES KNOWLEDGE FLOW? INTERFIRM PATTERNS IN THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY , 1996 .

[34]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[35]  David J. Teece,et al.  The Market for Know-How and the Efficient International Transfer of Technology , 1981 .

[36]  T. Davenport,et al.  Improving Knowledge Work Processes , 1996 .

[37]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[38]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[39]  Peter H. Gray,et al.  The effects of knowledge management systems on emergent teams: towards a research model , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[40]  L. Argote Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[41]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[42]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[43]  J. Whitney Case Study Research , 1999 .