Southern Hemisphere Cloud–Dynamics Biases in CMIP5 Models and Their Implications for Climate Projections

AbstractThis study quantifies cloud–radiative anomalies associated with interannual variability in the latitude of the Southern Hemisphere (SH) midlatitude eddy-driven jet, in 20 global climate models from phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). Two distinct model types are found. In the first class of models (type I models), total cloud fraction is reduced at SH midlatitudes as the jet moves poleward, contributing to enhanced shortwave radiative warming. In the second class of models (type II models), this dynamically induced cloud radiative warming effect is largely absent. Type I and type II models have distinct deficiencies in their representation of observed Southern Ocean clouds, but comparison with two independent satellite datasets indicates that the cloud–dynamics behavior of type II models is more realistic.Because the SH midlatitude jet shifts poleward in response to CO2 forcing, the cloud–dynamics biases uncovered from interannual variability are directly relevant for cli...

[1]  M. Zelinka,et al.  The response of the Southern Hemispheric eddy‐driven jet to future changes in shortwave radiation in CMIP5 , 2014 .

[2]  J. Kay,et al.  Processes controlling Southern Ocean shortwave climate feedbacks in CESM , 2014 .

[3]  Francis W. Zwiers,et al.  Overestimated global warming over the past 20 years , 2013 .

[4]  G. Tselioudis,et al.  The ozone hole indirect effect: Cloud‐radiative anomalies accompanying the poleward shift of the eddy‐driven jet in the Southern Hemisphere , 2013 .

[5]  Reto Knutti,et al.  Energy budget constraints on climate response , 2013 .

[6]  Elizabeth A. Barnes,et al.  Response of the Midlatitude Jets, and of Their Variability, to Increased Greenhouse Gases in the CMIP5 Models , 2013 .

[7]  Yen-Ting Hwang,et al.  Link between the double-Intertropical Convergence Zone problem and cloud biases over the Southern Ocean , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Ed Hawkins,et al.  The upper end of climate model temperature projections is inconsistent with past warming , 2013 .

[9]  T. Andrews,et al.  Evaluating adjusted forcing and model spread for historical and future scenarios in the CMIP5 generation of climate models , 2013 .

[10]  M. Webb,et al.  Origins of differences in climate sensitivity, forcing and feedback in climate models , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[11]  K. Taylor,et al.  Contributions of Different Cloud Types to Feedbacks and Rapid Adjustments in CMIP5 , 2012 .

[12]  D. Hartmann,et al.  Southern Hemisphere jet latitude biases in CMIP5 models linked to shortwave cloud forcing , 2012 .

[13]  Yuqing Wang,et al.  Cloud base and top heights in the Hawaiian region determined with satellite and ground‐based measurements , 2012 .

[14]  Robert Pincus,et al.  Exposing Global Cloud Biases in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) Using Satellite Observations and Their Corresponding Instrument Simulators , 2012 .

[15]  Regional assessment of the parameter‐dependent performance of CAM4 in simulating tropical clouds , 2012 .

[16]  S. Klein,et al.  Are climate model simulations of clouds improving? An evaluation using the ISCCP simulator , 2012 .

[17]  K. Taylor,et al.  Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere‐ocean climate models , 2012 .

[18]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[19]  Nicole Van Lipzig,et al.  Tropospheric clouds in Antarctica , 2012 .

[20]  David R. Doelling,et al.  Advances in Understanding Top-of-Atmosphere Radiation Variability from Satellite Observations , 2012, Surveys in Geophysics.

[21]  T. Reichler,et al.  Breaking down the tropospheric circulation response by forcing , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[22]  Cloud Adjustment and its Role in CO2 Radiative Forcing and Climate Sensitivity: A Review , 2012, Surveys in Geophysics.

[23]  Robert Pincus,et al.  Reconciling Simulated and Observed Views of Clouds: MODIS, ISCCP, and the Limits of Instrument Simulators in Climate Models , 2011 .

[24]  Stephen A. Klein,et al.  Computing and Partitioning Cloud Feedbacks Using Cloud Property Histograms. Part I: Cloud Radiative Kernels , 2012 .

[25]  G. Tselioudis,et al.  Changes in extratropical storm track cloudiness 1983–2008: observational support for a poleward shift , 2011, Climate Dynamics.

[26]  B. McAvaney,et al.  On tropospheric adjustment to forcing and climate feedbacks , 2011 .

[27]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[28]  L. Polvani,et al.  Stratospheric Ozone Depletion: The Main Driver of Twentieth-Century Atmospheric Circulation Changes in the Southern Hemisphere , 2011 .

[29]  K. Trenberth,et al.  Simulation of Present-Day and Twenty-First-Century Energy Budgets of the Southern Oceans , 2010 .

[30]  M. Webb,et al.  A quantitative performance assessment of cloud regimes in climate models , 2009 .

[31]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Aquaplanets, Climate Sensitivity, and Low Clouds , 2008 .

[32]  Sandrine Bony,et al.  An Assessment of the Primary Sources of Spread of Global Warming Estimates from Coupled Atmosphere–Ocean Models , 2008 .

[33]  T. Shepherd,et al.  The Impact of Stratospheric Ozone Recovery on the Southern Hemisphere Westerly Jet , 2008, Science.

[34]  Piers M. Forster,et al.  CO2 forcing induces semi‐direct effects with consequences for climate feedback interpretations , 2008 .

[35]  B. Soden,et al.  An Assessment of Climate Feedbacks in Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Models , 2006 .

[36]  Yoko Tsushima,et al.  Importance of the mixed-phase cloud distribution in the control climate for assessing the response of clouds to carbon dioxide increase: a multi-model study , 2006 .

[37]  I. Musat,et al.  On the contribution of local feedback mechanisms to the range of climate sensitivity in two GCM ensembles , 2006 .

[38]  S. Bony,et al.  Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models , 2005 .

[39]  Jeffrey H. Yin,et al.  A consistent poleward shift of the storm tracks in simulations of 21st century climate , 2005 .

[40]  A. Lacis,et al.  Calculation of radiative fluxes from the surface to top of atmosphere based on ISCCP and other global data sets: Refinements of the radiative transfer model and the input data , 2004 .

[41]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity , 2004 .

[42]  Nathan P. Gillett,et al.  Simulation of Recent Southern Hemisphere Climate Change , 2003, Science.

[43]  Paul J. Kushner,et al.  Southern Hemisphere Atmospheric Circulation Response to Global Warming , 2001 .

[44]  W. Rossow,et al.  Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP , 1999 .

[45]  B. Barkstrom,et al.  Cloud-Radiative Forcing and Climate: Results from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment , 1989, Science.