Author ' s personal copy The metacognitions of climate change

How do individuals think about global climate change? Although a body of research on the cognitive elements of climate change has begun to accumulate (e.g., Bord, O’Connor, & Fisher, 2000, few studies have distinguished between categories of cognitions. One key distinction is between primary, direct thoughts such as perceptions and evaluations, and secondary, indirect thoughts which reflect upon and control primary cognitions (Petty, Brinol, Tormala, & Wegner, 2007); secondary thoughts are thus considered metacognitive. This distinction is important to climate change engagement given that primary and secondary thoughts may exert independent effects on behavior. Three metacognitive elements of climate change are delineated: metacognitive knowledge, or assessments of confidence in one’s thoughts; metacognitive certainty, or assessments of the likelihood of an outcome; and metacognitive importance, or the relative emphasis placed on one’s thoughts. The relations between these dimensions and climate change-relevant behaviors are explored. Possibilities for future research are also discussed. Crown Copyright 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights

[1]  medolbec.  Testing Public (Un)Certainty of Science: Media Representations of Global Warming , 2010 .

[2]  I. Lorenzoni,et al.  Conceptual and practical barriers to adaptation: vulnerability and responses to heat waves in the UK , 2009 .

[3]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Knowledge and Confidence in Knowledge About Climate Change Among Experts, Journalists, Politicians, and Laypersons , 2009 .

[4]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Improving Communication of Uncertainty in the Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2009, Psychological science.

[5]  Robert Gifford,et al.  Psychology's essential role in alleviating the impacts of climate change. , 2008 .

[6]  Arnold Vedlitz,et al.  Personal Efficacy, the Information Environment, and Attitudes Toward Global Warming and Climate Change in the United States , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[7]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Cognitive and affective risk judgements related to climate change , 2007 .

[8]  A. Leiserowitz.  Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions, affective images, and interpretive communities. , 2007 .

[9]  Darryl B. Hill.  Theory in Applied Social Psychology , 2006 .

[10]  Suraje Dessai,et al.  Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change , 2006 .

[11]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Public Views on Climate Change: European and USA Perspectives , 2006 .

[12]  R. Gifford,et al.  Free-Market Ideology and Environmental Degradation , 2006 .

[13]  L. Antilla.  Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change , 2005 .

[14]  J. Hilton,et al.  Attitude Importance as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Implicit and Explicit Attitude Measures , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[15]  J. Krosnick,et al.  Attitude importance and the accumulation of attitude-relevant knowledge in memory. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  J. Jaccard,et al.  Metacognition, risk behavior, and risk outcomes: the role of perceived intelligence and perceived knowledge. , 2005, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[17]  Lisa Dilling,et al.  Making Climate HOT , 2004 .

[18]  Wouter Poortinga,et al.  Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  J. Simmons,et al.  Distinguishing the cognitive and behavioral consequences of attitude importance and certainty: A new approach to testing the common-factor hypothesis , 2003 .

[20]  Robert E. O'Connor,et al.  In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? , 2000 .

[21]  Charles Vlek,et al.  Essential psychology for environmental policy making , 2000 .

[22]  Jason C. Kinnell,et al.  Expert and Layperson Perceptions of Ecosystem Risk , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[23]  R. J. Bord,et al.  Risk Perceptions, General Environmental Beliefs, and Willingness to Address Climate Change , 1999 .

[24]  Gregory Schraw.  Promoting general metacognitive awareness , 1998 .

[25]  W. Bickel,et al.  Intertemporal Decision-Making for a Group , 2010, The Psychological record.

[26]  K. Montgomery,et al.  Information is not enough: the place of statistics in the doctor-patient relationship. , 2008, Cancer treatment and research.

[27]  Klaus Fiedler,et al.  Information ecology and the explanation of social cognition and behavior. , 2007 .

[28]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[29]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  Principles of mental representation , 2007 .

[30]  P. Salovey,et al.  36. The Reciprocal relation between principles and practice: social psychology and health behavior , 2007 .

[31]  F. Strack,et al.  17. The role of impulse in social behavior , 2007 .

[32]  R. Petty,et al.  The Role of MetaCognition in Social Judgment , 2006 .

[33]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Metacognition : knowing about knowing , 1994 .

[34]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .