Plaque formation on surface modified dental implants. An in vitro study.

Bacterial adhesion on titanium implant surfaces has a strong influence on healing and long-term outcome of dental implants. Parameters like surface roughness and chemical composition of the implant surface were found to have a significant impact on plaque formation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of two physical hard coatings on bacterial adhesion in comparison with control surfaces of equivalent roughness. Two members of the oral microflora, Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguis were used. Commercially pure titanium discs were modified using four different surface treatments: physical vapour deposition (PVD) with either titanium nitride (TiN) or zirconium nitride (ZrN), thermal oxidation and structuring with laser radiation. Polished titanium surfaces were used as controls. Surface topography was examined by SEM and estimation of surface roughness was done using a contact stylus profilometer. Contact angle measurements were carried out to calculate surface energy. Titanium discs were incubated in the respective bacterial cell suspension for one hour and single colonies formed by adhering bacteria were counted by fluorescence microscopy. Contact angle measurements showed no significant differences between the surface modifications. The surface roughness (Ra) of all surfaces examined was between 0.14 and 1.00 microm. A significant reduction of the number of adherent bacteria was observed on inherently stable titanium hard materials such as TiN and ZrN and thermically oxidated titanium surfaces compared to polished titanium. In conclusion, physical modification of titanium implant surfaces such as coating with TiN or ZrN may reduce bacterial adherence and hence improve clinical results.

[1]  J. van Houte,et al.  Bacterial Adherence and the Formation of Dental Plaques , 1980 .

[2]  M. Pierson,et al.  Intracellular glycosidases of human colon Bacteroides ovatus B4-11 , 1984, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[3]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Measurement of the surface free energy of bacterial cell surfaces and its relevance for adhesion , 1984, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[4]  H. Busscher,et al.  Kinetics of adhesion of the oral bacterium Streptococcus sanguis CH3 to polymers with different surface free energies , 1986, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[5]  R. Doyle,et al.  Kinetic Analysis of Streptococcus sanguis Adhesion to Artificial Pellicle , 1986, Journal of dental research.

[6]  H. Busscher,et al.  Surface-free energy and bacterial adhesion. An in vivo study in beagle dogs. , 1987, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[7]  P J Gregson,et al.  Application of PVD TiN coating to Co-Cr-Mo based surgical implants. , 1987, Biomaterials.

[8]  W Zingg,et al.  Protein adsorption to polymer particles: role of surface properties. , 1987, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[9]  A. Gristina,et al.  Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. , 1987, Science.

[10]  B. Kasemo,et al.  Biomaterial and implant surfaces: a surface science approach. , 1988, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[11]  H. Busscher,et al.  Effect of Zeta Potential and Surface Energy on Bacterial Adhesion to Uncoated and Saliva-coated Human Enamel and Dentin , 1988, Journal of dental research.

[12]  Newman Mg,et al.  A study of in vitro attachment of Streptococcus sanguis and Actinomyces viscosus to saliva-treated titanium. , 1989 .

[13]  H. Tsuchiya,et al.  In vivo plaque formation on implant materials. , 1989, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[14]  R. Kusy,et al.  The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study. , 1990, Journal of periodontology.

[15]  D van Steenberghe,et al.  The influence of surface free energy and surface roughness on early plaque formation. An in vivo study in man. , 1990, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[16]  J. C. Martin,et al.  Biocompatibility and corrosion resistance in biological media of hard ceramic coatings sputter deposited on metal implants , 1991 .

[17]  N. Lang,et al.  In vivo early human dental plaque formation on different supporting substances. A scanning electron microscopic and bacteriological study. , 1991, Clinical oral implants research.

[18]  Secretory IgA adsorption and oral streptococcal adhesion to human enamel and artificial solid substrata with various surface free energies. , 1991, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[19]  B. Collaert,et al.  Evaluation of different methods to clean titanium abutments. A scanning electron microscopic study. , 1992, Clinical oral implants research.

[20]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Soft tissue reaction to de novo plaque formation on implants and teeth. An experimental study in the dog. , 1992, Clinical oral implants research.

[21]  P. Glantz,et al.  Retention of streptococci to defined solid surfaces in the presence of saliva secretions. , 1992, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[22]  O. Knotek,et al.  Physical vapour deposition coatings for dental prostheses , 1992 .

[23]  H. Jehn,et al.  Corrosion studies with hard coating-substrate systems , 1992 .

[24]  M. Quirynen,et al.  An in vivo Study of the Influence of the Surface Roughness of Implants on the Microbiology of Supra- and Subgingival Plaque , 1993, Journal of dental research.

[25]  I. Milošev,et al.  A corrosion study of TiN (physical vapour deposition) hard coatings deposited on various substrates , 1994 .

[26]  M. Sela,et al.  Adsorption of salivary proteins onto prosthetic titanium components. , 1995, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[27]  Wu-Yuan Cd,et al.  Oral bacterial attachment to titanium surfaces: a scanning electron microscopy study. , 1995 .

[28]  M. Griepentrog,et al.  Properties of TiN hard coatings prepared by unbalanced magnetron sputtering and cathodic arc deposition using a uni- and bipolar pulsed bias voltage , 1995 .

[29]  M. Quirynen,et al.  The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[30]  F. Scannapieco,et al.  Experimental salivary pellicles formed on titanium surfaces mediate adhesion of streptococci. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[31]  M. Quirynen,et al.  The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[32]  S. Fare',et al.  The effect of surface roughness on early in vivo plaque colonization on titanium. , 1997, Journal of periodontology.

[33]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Soft tissue response to plaque formation at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[34]  G. Rasperini,et al.  In vivo early plaque formation on pure titanium and ceramic abutments: a comparative microbiological and SEM analysis. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[35]  M. Griepentrog,et al.  Mechanical properties and tribological behavior of TiN–CrAlN and CrN–CrAlN multilayer coatings , 1999 .