An EEG–MEG Dissociation between Online Syntactic Comprehension and Post Hoc Reanalysis

Successful comprehension of syntactically complex sentences depends on online language comprehension mechanisms as well as reanalysis in working memory. To differentiate the neural substrates of these processes, we recorded electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography (MEG) during sentence-picture-matching in healthy subjects, assessing the effects of two difficulty factors: syntactic complexity (object-embedded vs. subject-embedded relative clauses) and semantic reversibility on neuronal oscillations during sentence presentation, and during a subsequent memory delay prior to picture onset. Synthetic Aperture magnetometry analysis of MEG showed that semantic reversibility induced left lateralized perisylvian power decreases in a broad frequency range, approximately 8–30 Hz. This effect followed the relative clause presentation and persisted throughout the remainder of the sentence and the subsequent memory delay period, shifting to a more frontal distribution during the delay. In contrast, syntactic complexity induced enhanced power decreases only during the delay period, in bilateral frontal and anterior temporal regions. These results indicate that detailed syntactic parsing of auditory language input may be augmented in the absence of alternative cues for thematic role assignment, as reflected by selective perisylvian engagement for reversible sentences, compared with irreversible sentences in which world knowledge constrains possible thematic roles. Furthermore, comprehension of complex syntax appears to depend on post hoc reanalysis in working memory implemented by frontal regions in both hemispheres.

[1]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[2]  A. Sanford,et al.  Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Event-related dynamics of cortical rhythms: frequency-specific features and functional correlates. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[4]  G. Waters,et al.  A study of syntactic processing in aphasia II: Neurological aspects , 2004, Brain and Language.

[5]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Event-related brain potentials and human language , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  Shigeru Sato,et al.  Is Broca's area involved in the processing of passive sentences? An event-related fMRI study , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[8]  Jed A. Meltzer,et al.  Effects of Working Memory Load on Oscillatory Power in Human Intracranial EEG , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  M. Kutas,et al.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Vrba,et al.  Signal processing in magnetoencephalography. , 2001, Methods.

[11]  J. Trueswell,et al.  Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[12]  Krish D. Singh,et al.  A new approach to neuroimaging with magnetoencephalography , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[13]  F. Dick,et al.  Language deficits, localization, and grammar: evidence for a distributive model of language breakdown in aphasic patients and neurologically intact individuals. , 2001, Psychological review.

[14]  Rita Sloan Berndt,et al.  Comprehension of reversible sentences in “agrammatism”: a meta-analysis , 1996, Cognition.

[15]  M. Just,et al.  Language comprehension: sentence and discourse processing. , 1995, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  Michael W. L. Chee,et al.  Frequency of Concrete Words Modulates Prefrontal Activation during Semantic Judgments , 2002, NeuroImage.

[17]  A D Friederici,et al.  Syntactic parsing as revealed by brain responses: First-pass and second-pass parsing processes , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[18]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  N400-like Magnetoencephalography Responses Modulated by Semantic Context, Word Frequency, and Lexical Class in Sentences , 2002, NeuroImage.

[19]  A. Friederici,et al.  Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[21]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia , 1976, Brain and Language.

[22]  John D E Gabrieli,et al.  The role of the prefrontal cortex in the maintenance of verbal working memory: an event-related FMRI analysis. , 2005, Neuropsychology.

[23]  T. Hendler,et al.  The Neural Reality of Syntactic Transformations , 2003, Psychological science.

[24]  H. H. Clark The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[25]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  GLM-beamformer method demonstrates stationary field, alpha ERD and gamma ERS co-localisation with fMRI BOLD response in visual cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[26]  D. Caplan Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Syntactic Processing , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[27]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  Y. Grodzinsky,et al.  A new empirical angle on the variability debate: Quantitative neurosyntactic analyses of a large data set from Broca’s Aphasia , 2006, Brain and Language.

[29]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  Eric Maris,et al.  Randomization tests for ERP topographies and whole spatiotemporal data matrices. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[31]  Adrian L. Williams,et al.  Task-Related Changes in Cortical Synchronization Are Spatially Coincident with the Hemodynamic Response , 2002, NeuroImage.

[32]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  M Doppelmayr,et al.  A method for the calculation of induced band power: implications for the significance of brain oscillations. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[34]  Allen R. Braun,et al.  Neural Aspects of Sentence Comprehension: Syntactic Complexity, Reversibility, and Reanalysis , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  A disorder of executive function and its role in language processing. , 2008, Seminars in speech and language.

[36]  Donald B. Percival,et al.  Spectral Analysis for Physical Applications , 1993 .

[37]  G. Waters,et al.  PET Studies of Syntactic Processing with Auditory Sentence Presentation , 1999, NeuroImage.

[38]  David Poeppel,et al.  Reconstructing spatio-temporal activities of neural sources using an MEG vector beamformer technique , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  David Poeppel,et al.  Reconstructing spatio-temporal activities of neural sources using MEG vector beamformer , 2000, NeuroImage.

[40]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[41]  David Caplan,et al.  Localization of Syntactic Comprehension by Positron Emission Tomography , 1998, NeuroImage.

[42]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The P600 as an indicator of syntactic ambiguity , 2002, Cognition.

[43]  N. Crone,et al.  High-frequency gamma oscillations and human brain mapping with electrocorticography. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[44]  J. Desmond,et al.  Load-Dependent Roles of Frontal Brain Regions in the Maintenance of Working Memory , 1999, NeuroImage.

[45]  G. Waters,et al.  A study of syntactic processing in aphasia I: Behavioral (psycholinguistic) aspects , 2004, Brain and Language.

[46]  G. Waters,et al.  Vascular responses to syntactic processing: Event‐related fMRI study of relative clauses , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[47]  Karl G. D. Bailey,et al.  Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension , 2002 .

[48]  Robert T. Schultz,et al.  Integrated Intensity and Point-Feature Nonrigid Registration , 2004, MICCAI.

[49]  June Sic Kim,et al.  Language lateralization using MEG beta frequency desynchronization during auditory oddball stimulation with one-syllable words , 2008, NeuroImage.

[50]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[51]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[52]  Robert T. Schultz,et al.  Integrated Intensity and Point-Feature Nonrigid Registration. , 2001 .

[53]  Y. Grodzinsky The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[54]  G. Waters,et al.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.