Faculty feedback: Perceptions and practices in L2 disciplinary writing

While a great deal of the research on feedback given to second language writers focuses narrowly on what goes on in language classrooms, most of the writing that matters to undergraduates occurs in disciplinary contexts. Students are attending academic writing courses to more effectively participate in the debates of their disciplines and to demonstrate their learning to readers in those disciplines. They are ‘Writing to Learn’ rather than ‘Learning to Write’, yet we often know little about the advice faculty give to students or what they are trying to achieve through their feedback. The study seeks to move L2 writing feedback studies beyond the texts produced for teachers in the writing classroom while contributing to our understanding of students’ attempts to write themselves into their disciplines. Drawing on interviews with 20 teachers from four faculties at an English medium university in Hong Kong, I explore their perceptions of feedback to illuminate students’ experiences of disciplinary writing. Overall, the findings show that faculty teachers’ feedback is shaped by a desire to see students write in disciplinary approved ways, yet only infrequently supports students towards this goal.

[1]  Larry Ambrose,et al.  The power of feedback. , 2002, Healthcare executive.

[2]  Pat Currie,et al.  Entering a disciplinary community: Conceptual activities required to write for one introductory university course☆ , 1993 .

[3]  Dana R. Ferris,et al.  ERROR FEEDBACK IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: HOW EXPLICIT DOES IT NEED TO BE? , 2001 .

[4]  Wilfried Admiraal,et al.  Peer assessment in university teaching: evaluating seven course designs , 2006 .

[5]  Diane Belcher,et al.  English for Specific Purposes in Theory and Practice , 2009 .

[6]  Rosa M. Manchón Chapter 1. Situating the learning-to-write and writing-to-learn dimensions of L2 writing , 2011 .

[7]  Dana Ferris,et al.  Feedback in Second Language Writing: Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction , 2006 .

[8]  Julio Gimenez,et al.  Beyond the academic essay: discipline-specific writing in nursing and midwifery , 2008 .

[9]  Ken Hyland Student perceptions of hidden messages in teacher written feedback , 2013 .

[10]  M. Price,et al.  Feedback : all that effort, but what is the effect? , 2010 .

[11]  Kerri-Lee Krause,et al.  The First Year Experience in Australian Universities: Findings from a decade of National Studies , 2005 .

[12]  Ken Hyland Learning to write: issues in theory, research, and pedagogy , 2011 .

[13]  D. Carless Differing perceptions in the feedback process , 2006 .

[14]  Brian Street,et al.  Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: an academic literacies approach , 2000 .

[15]  M. Weaver,et al.  Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses , 2006 .

[16]  Fiona Hyland,et al.  The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers , 1998 .

[17]  John Truscott,et al.  Error correction, revision, and learning , 2008 .

[18]  Fiona English,et al.  Student Writing and Genre: Reconfiguring Academic Knowledge , 2011 .

[19]  K. Hyland,et al.  English for Academic Purposes , 2012, US-China Foreign Language.

[20]  Tony Becher,et al.  Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysis , 2002 .

[21]  Marina Bondi,et al.  Academic discourse across disciplines , 2006 .

[22]  John Bitchener,et al.  Evidence in Support of Written Corrective Feedback. , 2008 .

[23]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Genre and second language writing , 2003 .

[24]  John Truscott,et al.  The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately , 2007 .

[25]  Icy Lee Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms , 2008 .

[26]  Rosa M. Manchón Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language , 2011 .

[27]  Ute Knoch,et al.  The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback , 2009 .

[28]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing , 2002, J. Documentation.

[29]  Linxiu Yang Academic Writing: At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse , 2011 .

[30]  Ilona Leki,et al.  Undergraduates in a Second Language: Challenges and Complexities of Academic Literacy Development , 2007 .

[31]  Richard Marius,et al.  On Academic Discourse. , 1990 .

[32]  M. Sharples M.R. Lea and B. Stierer (eds) 2000. Student Writing in Higher Education: New Contexts , 2000 .

[33]  M. S. Sternglass Time To Know Them: A Longitudinal Study of Writing and Learning at the College Level , 1997 .

[34]  Diane Pecorari,et al.  Academic writing : At the interface of corpus and discourse , 2009 .

[35]  Ursula Wingate,et al.  Using Academic Literacies and Genre-Based Models for Academic Writing Instruction: A "Literacy" Journey. , 2012 .

[36]  John Truscott,et al.  Arguments and appearances: A response to Chandler , 2009 .

[37]  Alice Lawrence,et al.  Genres Across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education , 2013 .

[38]  R. Ivanič,et al.  What am I supposed to make of this? : the messages conveyed to students by tutors' written comments. , 2000 .

[39]  Theresa Lillis,et al.  Student Writing: Access, Regulation, Desire , 2001 .

[40]  D. Ferris Student Reactions to Teacher Response in Multiple‐Draft Composition Classrooms* , 1995 .

[41]  María C. M. de Guerrero,et al.  Feedback in Second Language Writing: Sociocultural theory: A framework for understanding the social-cognitive dimensions of peer feedback , 2006 .

[42]  D. Polkinghorne Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis , 1995 .